1887

Abstract

In 1999, an outbreak involving 188 patients with Legionnaires' disease (LD) occurred at a flower show in the Netherlands. This large outbreak provided the opportunity to evaluate serum antibody tests to assay anti-, since limited data are available on the sensitivity of these tests. The sensitivities of an indirect serotype 1-6 immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT), a rapid micro-agglutination test (RMAT) IgM serotype 1 antibody assay, and an ELISA to detect IgM and IgG serotype 1-7 antibodies, were evaluated using serum samples from LD patients related to the 1999 outbreak. Sensitivity was calculated using positive culture and/or a positive urinary antigen test as the gold standard in outbreak-related patients with radiographically confirmed pneumonia who fulfilled the epidemiological criteria. The IFAT, RMAT and ELISA showed sensitivities of 61, 44 and 64 %, respectively. The sensitivity of the three tests combined was 67 %. In epidemic situations, however, high standing titres may be included in the laboratory evidence of LD cases. In the study population, high standing titres were found in 16 % of cases. If the presence of high standing antibody titres was added to the criteria of a positive test, the sensitivities of IFAT, RMAT and ELISA were 86, 48 and 75 %, respectively. The sensitivity was 91 % for all tests combined. The higher sensitivity for the combined use of tests is offset by a reduction in specificity to 97·6 %. The results of this study indicate that using a combination of serologic tests in pneumonia patients suspected to have LD does not substantially improve sensitivity. The results suggest that in the microbiological diagnosis of LD, both IFAT and ELISA are reasonably sensitive assays. In an epidemic situation, both tests are highly sensitive, the IFAT more so than the ELISA.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.46369-0
2006-05-01
2019-11-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/55/5/561.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.46369-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Anonymous ( 1998; ). Legionnaires' disease in Europe. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 73, 257–261.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bangsborg, J. M., Shand, G. H., Hansen, K. & Wright, J. B. ( 1994; ). Performance of four different indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to detect specific IgG, IgA, and IgM in Legionnaires' disease. APMIS 102, 501–508.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Birtles, R. J., Harrison, T. G., Samuel, D. & Taylor, A. G. ( 1990; ). Evaluation of urinary antigen ELISA for diagnosing Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 infection. J Clin Pathol 43, 685–690.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bohte, R., van Furth, R. & van den Broek, P. J. ( 1995; ). Aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective study among adults requiring admission to hospital. Thorax 50, 543–547.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boshuizen, H. C., Den Boer, J. W., De Melker, H., Schellekens, J. F., Peeters, M. F., van Vliet, J. A. & Conyn-van Spaendonck, M. A. ( 2003; ). Reference values for the SERION classic ELISA for detecting Legionella pneumophila antibodies. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 22, 706–708.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Den Boer, J. W., Yzerman, E. P., Schellekens, J. & 11 other authors. ( 2002; ). A large outbreak of Legionnaires' disease at a flower show, the Netherlands, 1999. Emerg Infect Dis 8, 37–43.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dominguez, J. A., Manterola, J. M., Blavia, R. & 7 other authors. ( 1996; ). Detection of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen in nonconcentrated urine and urine concentrated by selective ultrafiltration. J Clin Microbiol 34, 2334–2336.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dominguez, J. A., Gali, N., Pedroso, P., Fargas, A., Padilla. E., Manterola, J. M. & Matas, L. ( 1998; ). Comparison of the Binax Legionella urinary antigen enzyme immunoassay, (EIA) with the Biotest Legionella Urin antigen EIA for detection of Legionella antigen in both concentrated and nonconcentrated urine samples. J Clin Microbiol 36, 2718–2722.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dominguez, J., Gali, N., Matas, L., Pedroso, P., Hernandez, A., Padilla, E. & Ausina, V. ( 1999; ). Evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic assay for the detection of Legionella antigen in urine samples. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 18, 896–898.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Etienne, J., Vandenesch, F. & Lina, G. Jarraud ( 1999; ). Evaluation des SERION ELISA classic Legionella pneumophila 1–7 (IgG, IgM). Leusden, The Netherlands: Clindia Benelux bv.
  11. Farshy, C. E., Klein, G. C. & Feeley, J. C. ( 1978; ). Detection of antibodies to Legionnaires disease organism by microagglutination and micro-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests. J Clin Microbiol 7, 327–331.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fry, N. K., Bangsborg, J. M., Bernander, S. & 11 other authors. ( 2000; ). Assessment of intercentre reproducibility and epidemiological concordance of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 genotyping by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 19, 773–780.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Harrison, T. G. & Taylor, A. G. ( 1982; ). A rapid microagglutination test for the diagnosis of Legionella pneumophila (serogroup 1) infection. J Clin Pathol 35, 1028–1031.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Harrison, T. G., Dournon, E. & Taylor, A. G. ( 1987; ). Evaluation of sensitivity of two serological tests for diagnosing pneumonia caused by Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1. J Clin Pathol 40, 77–82.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Helbig, J. H., Uldum, S. A., Luck, P. C. & Harrison, T. G. ( 2001; ). Detection of Legionella pneumophila antigen in urine samples by the BinaxNOW immunochromatographic assay and comparison with both Binax Legionella Urinary Enzyme Immunoassay, (EIA) and Biotest Legionella Urin Antigen, EIA. J Med Microbiol 50, 509–516.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Helbig, J. H., Bernander, S., Castellani, P. M. & 13 other authors. ( 2002; ). Pan-European study on culture-proven Legionnaires' disease: distribution of Legionella pneumophila serogroups and monoclonal subgroups. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 21, 710–716.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoge, C. W. & Breiman, R. F. ( 1991; ). Advances in the epidemiology and control of Legionella infections. Epidemiol Rev 13, 329–340.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Marston, B. J., Plouffe, J. F., File, T. M., Jr, Hackman, B. A., Salstrom, S. J., Lipman, H. B., Kolczak, M. S. & Breiman, R. F. ( 1997; ). Incidence of community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization. Results of a population-based active surveillance study in Ohio. The Community-Based Pneumonia Incidence Study Group. Arch Intern Med 157, 1709–1718.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. McDade, J. E., Shepard, C. C., Fraser, D. W., Tsai, T. R., Redus, M. A. & Dowdle, W. R. ( 1977; ). Legionnaires' disease: isolation of a bacterium and demonstration of its role in other respiratory disease. N Engl J Med 297, 1197–1203.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Niederman, M. S., Bass, J. B., Jr, Campbell, G. D. & 7 other authors. ( 1993; ). Guidelines for the initial management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia: diagnosis, assessment of severity, and initial antimicrobial therapy, American Thoracic Society. Medical Section of the American Lung Association. Am Rev Respir Dis 148, 1418–1426.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ruf, B., Schurmann, D., Horbach, I., Fehrenbach, F. J. & Pohle, H. D. ( 1990; ). Prevalence and diagnosis of Legionella pneumonia: a, 3-year prospective study with emphasis on application of urinary antigen detection. J Infect Dis 162, 1341–1348.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Wreghitt, T. G., Nagington, J. & Gray, J. ( 1982; ). An ELISA test for the detection of antibodies to Legionella pneumophila. J Clin Pathol 35, 657–660.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Yu, V. L., Plouffe, J. F., Pastoris, M. C. & 8 other authors. ( 2002; ). Distribution of Legionella species and serogroups isolated by culture in patients with sporadic community-acquired legionellosis: an international collaborative survey. J Infect Dis 186, 127–128.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.46369-0
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.46369-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error