1887

Abstract

Members of the genus Gram-positive, non-spore-forming anaerobic bacteria, are normal inhabitants of the mucosal surfaces of the oral, gastrointestinal and genital tracts. Identification of these bacteria using conventional methods is generally difficult because of their complex transport and growth requirements and their fastidious and slow-growing nature. However, in recent years, the advancement of molecular techniques has provided much improved identification and differentiation of closely related species. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the PCR technique in the diagnosis of genital in comparison with culturing and Papanicolaou (Pap) smear microscopy. Multiple sampling was conducted from 200 women using smear microscopy, culturing and PCR. Cyto-brushes were smeared on glass slides and stained using the routine Pap technique. Culturing was performed from a sterile swab, and were determined using the BBL Crystal ANR ID kit. PCR was performed from a second swab, and the type was determined using type-specific primers designed in our laboratory. Only one vaginal fluid sample (0.5%) revealed -like organisms on Pap smear examination. were detected in nine samples (4.5%) using the BBL Crystal ANR ID kit. Using PCR, eight samples (4%) were found positive for . No specimens that gave positive results by Pap smear microscopy and culturing could be confirmed by PCR. Pap smear microscopy and culturing were both found to have zero sensitivity for . PCR appears to be a sensitive and reliable diagnostic method for the detection of , which are difficult to cultivate from genital samples. PCR can be used for diagnostic confirmation in cases diagnosed by conventional methods, to prevent false-positive results.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.053165-0
2013-05-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/62/5/727.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.053165-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Blairon L., Maza M. L., Wybo I., Piérard D., Dediste A., Vandenberg O. 2010; Vitek 2 ANC card versus BBL Crystal Anaerobe and RapID ANA II for identification of clinical anaerobic bacteria. Anaerobe 16:355–361 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Carrillo M., Valdez B., Vargas L., Alvarez L., Schorr M., Zlatev R., Stoytcheva M. 2010; In vitro Actinomyces israelii biofilm development on IUD copper surfaces. Contraception 81:261–264 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Choi M. M., Baek J. H., Lee J. N., Park S., Lee W. S. 2009; Clinical features of abdominopelvic actinomycosis: report of twenty cases and literature review. Yonsei Med J 50:555–559 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Collins M. D., Hoyles L., Kalfas S., Sundquist G., Monsen T., Nikolaitchouk N., Falsen E. 2000; Characterization of Actinomyces isolates from infected root canals of teeth: description of Actinomyces radicidentis sp. nov.. J Clin Microbiol 38:3399–3403[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Elsayed S., George A., Zhang K. 2006; Intrauterine contraceptive device-associated pelvic actinomycosis caused by Actinomyces urogenitalis. Anaerobe 12:67–70 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ertan T., Kılıç M., Keşşaf Aşlar A., Yoldaş Ö., Göçmen E., Koç M. 2005; Actinomycosis of sigmoid colon: mimicking a colon cancer. Journal of Selçuk Faculty of Medicine 22:63–66
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fiorino A. S. 1996; Intrauterine contraceptive device-associated actinomycotic abscess and Actinomyces detection on cervical smear. Obstet Gynecol 87:142–149 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fitzhugh V. A., Heller D. S. 2008; Significance of a diagnosis of microorganisms on Pap smear. J Low Genit Tract Dis 12:40–51 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fu P. K., Tsai C. A. 2010; Management of patients with huge pelvic actinomycosis complicated with hydronephrosis: a case report. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 43:442–446 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hall V., Talbot P. R., Stubbs S. L., Duerden B. I. 2001; Identification of clinical isolates of Actinomyces species by amplified 16S ribosomal DNA restriction analysis. J Clin Microbiol 39:3555–3562 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jauh-Hsun C., Vinh T., Davies J. K., Figdor D. 1999; Molecular approaches to the differentiation of Actinomyces species. Oral Microbiol Immunol 14:250–256 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnson J. L., Moore L. V., Kaneko B., Moore W. E. 1990; Actinomyces georgiae sp. nov., Actinomyces gerencseriae sp. nov., designation of two genospecies of Actinomyces naeslundii, and inclusion of A. naeslundii serotypes II and III and Actinomyces viscosus serotype II in A. naeslundii genospecies 2. Int J Syst Bacteriol 40:273–286 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Joshi C., Sharma R., Mohsin Z. 2010; Pelvic actinomycosis: a rare entity presenting as tubo-ovarian abscess. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281:305–306 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaszuba M., Tomaszewska R., Pityński K., Grzanka P., Bazan-Socha S., Musiał J. 2008; Actinomycosis mimicing advanced cancer. Pol Arch Med Wewn 118:581–584[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaya D., Demirezen Ş., Hasçelik G., Erciş S., Beksaç M. S. 2009; The detection of genital Actinomyces by cytological and microbiological methods. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med 15:157–161
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lau S. K., Woo P. C., Fung A. M., Chan K. M., Woo G. K., Yuen K. Y. 2004; Anaerobic, non-sporulating, Gram-positive bacilli bacteraemia characterized by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. J Med Microbiol 53:1247–1253 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Petrikkos G. L., Hadjisoteriou M., Daikos G. L. 2007; PCR versus culture in the detection of vaginal Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis.. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 97:202–203 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Quercia R., Bani Sadr F., Cortez A., Arlet G., Pialoux G. 2006; Genital tract actinomycosis caused by Actimyces israëlii. Med Mal Infect 36:393–395 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ruby J. D., Li Y., Luo Y., Caufield P. W. 2002; Genetic characterization of the oral Actinomyces. Arch Oral Biol 47:457–463 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sato T., Matsuyama J., Takahashi N., Sato M., Johnson J., Schachtele C., Hoshino E. 1998; Differentiation of oral Actinomyces species by 16S ribosomal DNA polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Arch Oral Biol 43:247–252 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Schwebke J. R., Lawing L. F. 2001; Prevalence of Mobiluncus spp. among women with and without bacterial vaginosis as detected by polymerase chain reaction. Sex Transm Dis 28:195–199 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Stellrecht K. A., Woron A. M., Mishrik N. G., Venezia R. A. 2004; Comparison of multiplex PCR assay with culture for detection of genital mycoplasmas. J Clin Microbiol 42:1528–1533 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Tamer A., Gündüz Y., Karabay O., İka H., Aksel F. 2006; Abdominal actinomycosis: a case report mimicking colon tumor. Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 26:330–333
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Tang G., Samaranayake L. P., Yip H. K., Chu F. C., Tsang P. C., Cheung B. P. 2003; Direct detection of Actinomyces spp. from infected root canals in a Chinese population: a study using PCR-based, oligonucleotide-DNA hybridization technique. J Dent 31:559–568 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Tang G., Samaranayake L. P., Yip H. K. 2004; Genotypic diversity of oral Actinomyces naeslundii genospecies 1 and 2 in caries-active preschool children. Oral Microbiol Immunol 19:371–378 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Van Dellen J. R. 2010; Actinomycosis: an ancient disease difficult to diagnose. World Neurosurg 74:263–264 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang Y. H., Tsai H. C., Lee S. S., Mai M. H., Wann S. R., Chen Y. S., Liu Y. C. 2007; Clinical manifestations of actinomycosis in Southern Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 40:487–492[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Westhoff C. 2007; IUDs and colonization or infection with Actinomyces. Contraception 75:Suppl.S48–S50 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Xia T., Baumgartner J. C. 2003; Occurrence of Actinomyces in infections of endodontic origin. J Endod 29:549–552 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.053165-0
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.053165-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error