1887

Journal of Medical Microbiology logo

Volume 72, Issue 5

Enhanced monitoring of healthcare shower water in augmented and non-augmented care wards showing persistence of despite remediation work Open Access

Abstract

in healthcare shower waters presents a high risk of infection to immune-suppressed patients; identifying the colonization-status of water outlets is essential in preventing acquisition.

Testing frequencies may be insufficient to capture presence/absence of contamination in healthcare waters between sampling and remediation activities. Standardization of outlets may facilitate the management and control of .

This study aims to monitor shower waters and drains for in augmented and non-augmented healthcare settings every 2 weeks for a period of 7 months during remedial actions.

All shower facilities were standardized to include antimicrobial silver-impregnated showerhead/hose units, hose-length fixed to 0.8 m and replaced every 3 months. Standard hospital manual decontamination/disinfection occurred daily. Thermostatic-mixer-valves (TMVs) were replaced and disinfected if standard remediation unsuccessful.

Of 560 shower and drain samples collected over 14 time-points covering 7 months, colonized 40 %(4/10; non-augmented) and 80 %(8/10; augmented-care) showers in the first week. For each week elapsed, new outlets became contaminated with by 18–19 % (<0.001) in shower waters (OR=1.19; CI=1.09–1.31) and drains (OR=1.18; CI=1.09–1.30). occurrence in shower water was associated with subsequent colonization of the corresponding drain and vice versa (chi-square; <0.001) with simultaneous contamination present in 31 %(87/280) of areas. TMV replacement was ineffective in eradicating colonisation in ~83 % of a subset (6/20; three per ward) of contaminated showers.

We demonstrate the difficulties in eradicating from hospital plumbing, particularly when contamination is no longer sporadic. Non-augmented care settings are reservoirs of and should not be overlooked in outbreak investigations. Antimicrobial-impregnated materials may be ineffective once colonization with is established beyond the hose and head. Reducing hose-length insufficient to prevent cross-contamination from shower drains. colonization can be transient in both drain and shower hose/head. Frequent microbiological monitoring suggests testing frequencies following HTM04-01 guidelines are insufficient to capture the colonization-status of healthcare waters between samples. Disinfection/decontamination is recommended to minimize bioburden and the effect of remediation should be verified with microbiological monitoring. Where standard remediation did not remove contamination, intensive monitoring supported justifying replacement of showers and contiguous plumbing.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): antimicrobial resistance , hospital environment , hospital shower water and drains and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre
    • Principle Award Recipient: WilsonPeter
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanliği
    • Principle Award Recipient: YetişÖzge
© 2023 The Authors
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001698
2023-05-31
2024-05-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/72/5/jmm001698.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001698&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Loveday HP, Wilson JA, Kerr K, Pitchers R, Walker JT et al. Association between healthcare water systems and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a rapid systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2014; 86:7–15 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bédard E, Prévost M, Déziel E. Pseudomonas aeruginosa in premise plumbing of large buildings. Microbiologyopen 2016; 5:937–956 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Recio R, Mancheño M, Viedma E, Villa J, Orellana MÁ et al. Predictors of mortality in bloodstream infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and impact of antimicrobial resistance and bacterial virulence. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020; 64:e01759-19 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Fingertips AMR local indicators. P. aeruginosa bacteraemia all counts and rates by acute trust - Public Health England; 2022 https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/amr-local-indicators/data#page/3/gid/1938132910/pat/158/par/TE_trust/ati/118/are/RGT/iid/93399/age/1/sex/4/cid/4/tbm/1 accessed 10 January 2022
  5. Ortolano GA, McAlister MB, Angelbeck JA, Schaffer J, Russell RL et al. Hospital water point-of-use filtration: a complementary strategy to reduce the risk of nosocomial infection. Am J Infect Control 2005; 33:S1–19 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Wu W, Jin Y, Bai F, Jin S. Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Mol Med 2015; 2:753–767 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Exner M, Kramer A, Lajoie L, Gebel J, Engelhart S et al. Prevention and control of health care-associated waterborne infections in health care facilities. Am J Infect Control 2005; 33:S26–40 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Department of Health. Health Technical Memorandum 04-01: Safe water in healthcare premises. Part C: Pseudomonas aeruginosa – advice for augmented care units; 2016
  9. American National Standards Institute ASTM D5612-94 - Standard Guide for Quality Planning and Field Implementation of a Water Quality Measurement Program; 2008 https://webstore.ansi.org/Standards/ASTM/ASTMD5612942008 accessed 17 January 2022
  10. American National Standards Institute How Standards Support National Water Quality Month; 2015 https://www.ansi.org/news/standards-news/all-news/2015/08/how-standards-support-national-water-quality-month-11 accessed 17 January 2022
  11. Department of Health. Health Technical Memorandum 04-01: Safe water in healthcare premises Part A: Design, installation and commissioning; 2016
  12. Hutchins CF, Moore G, Webb J, Walker JT. Investigating alternative materials to EPDM for automatic taps in the context of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and biofilm control. J Hosp Infect 2020; 106:429–435 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Blanc DS, Nahimana I, Petignat C, Wenger A, Bille J et al. Faucets as a reservoir of endemic Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization/infections in intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:1964–1968 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Moore G, Walker J. Presence and control of Legionella pneumophila and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in hospital water systems. Biofilms Infect. Prev. Control A Healthc Handb., Elsevier Inc; 2014311–37 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397043-5.00017-7
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Department of Health. Health Technical Memorandum 04-01: Safe water in healthcare premises Part B: Operational management; 2016
  16. PHE UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations-standards-for-microbiology-investigations-smi-quality-and-consistency-in-clinical-laboratories PHE Publications gateway number: 2015013 UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations are produced in association with; 2015
  17. Hudzicki J. Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test protocol author information. ASM 20121–13
     [Google Scholar]
  18. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters Version 11.0; 2022 http://www.eucast.org
  19. Thames Water Thames Water Utilities Limited Water Quality Report; 2021 pp 1–12 https://www.thameswater.co.uk/help/water-quality/check-your-water-quality#/search
  20. Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Møller K, Kristiansen S, Phipps R, Nielsen AK et al. Silver against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. APMIS 2007; 115:921–928 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Berrouane YF, McNutt LA, Buschelman BJ, Rhomberg PR, Sanford MD et al. Outbreak of severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections caused by a contaminated drain in a whirlpool bathtub. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 31:1331–1337 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Stoodley P, Cargo R, Rupp CJ, Wilson S, Klapper I. Biofilm material properties as related to shear-induced deformation and detachment phenomena. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2002; 29:361–367 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Stoodley P, Jacobsen A, Dunsmore BC, Purevdorj B, Wilson S et al. The influence of fluid shear and AlCl3 on the material properties of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Desulfovibrio sp. EX265 biofilms. Water Sci Technol 2001; 43:113–120 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Buckingham-Meyer K, Goeres DM, Hamilton MA. Comparative evaluation of biofilm disinfectant efficacy tests. J Microbiol Methods 2007; 70:236–244 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Yui S, Karia K, Ali S, Muzslay M, Wilson P. Thermal disinfection at suboptimal temperature of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on copper pipe and shower hose materials. J Hosp Infect 2021; 117:103–110 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Cholley P, Thouverez M, Floret N, Bertrand X, Talon D. The role of water fittings in intensive care rooms as reservoirs for the colonization of patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34:1428–1433 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Aumeran C, Paillard C, Robin F, Kanold J, Baud O et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas putida outbreak associated with contaminated water outlets in an oncohaematology paediatric unit. J Hosp Infect 2007; 65:47–53 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Halstead FD, Quick J, Niebel M, Garvey M, Cumley N et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in augmented care: the molecular ecology and transmission dynamics in four large UK hospitals. J Hosp Infect 2021; 111:162–168 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Coppry M, Leroyer C, Saly M, Venier A-G, Slekovec C et al. Exogenous acquisition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care units: a prospective multi-centre study (DYNAPYO study). J Hosp Infect 2020; 104:40–45 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Quick J, Cumley N, Wearn CM, Niebel M, Constantinidou C et al. Seeking the source of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in a recently opened hospital: an observational study using whole-genome sequencing. BMJ Open 2014; 4:e006278 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Jorth P, McLean K, Ratjen A, Secor PR, Bautista GE et al. Evolved aztreonam resistance is multifactorial and can produce hypervirulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mBio 2017; 8:e00517-17 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001698
Loading
Enhanced monitoring of healthcare shower water in augmented and non-augmented care wards showing persistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa despite remediation work
J. Med. Microbiol. 72, 001698 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001698
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001698
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001698
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error