1887

Abstract

The gene encodes a thermonuclease which is present in but not in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and is the target of the rapid phenotypic thermonuclease test. The effect of gene variation in methicillin-resistant (MRSA) on the performance of PCR testing has been noted, although there are no reports about the effect of MRSA on the activity of the thermonuclease enzyme.

Our goals were to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the thermonuclease test used to distinguish from CoNS cultured from blood. In addition, we aimed to assess differences in the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the thermonuclease test between methicillin-sensitive (MSSA) and MRSA isolates.

We performed a retrospective analysis of 1404 isolates. Each isolate from a positive blood culture was identified as a Gram-positive coccus by microscopy then analysed with the thermonuclease test (Southern Group Laboratory) prior to confirmatory identification using VITEK microbial identification platforms (bioMérieux) and cefoxitin disc diffusion testing.

Of 1331 samples included in the final analysis, 189 were thermonuclease-positive, of which 176 were identified as . Of the 1142 thermonuclease-negative samples, 13 were finally identified as , giving a sensitivity of 93.1 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 88.5–96.3) and specificity of 98.9 % (95 % CI 98.1–99.4). Of the nine proven MRSA samples, eight were thermonuclease-positive, giving a sensitivity of 88.9 % (95 % CI 51.8–99.7). Thermonuclease test accuracy for MSSA and MRSA isolates was 98.1 % (95 % CI 97.2–98.8) versus 98.8 % (95 % CI 98.0–99.3), respectively.

In the era of increasing use of molecular-based microbiology assays, the thermonuclease test remains a simple, inexpensive and robust test for the presumptive identification of cultured from blood, irrespective of methicillin sensitivity.

  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001166
2020-02-26
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/69/4/548.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001166&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Lodise TP, McKinnon PS, Swiderski L, Rybak MJ. Outcomes analysis of delayed antibiotic treatment for hospital-acquired Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36:1418–1423 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Public Health England Thermonuclease test. UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations, TP 34 Issue 4. London: Public Health England; 2019
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lagacé-Wiens PRS, Alfa MJ, Manickam K, Karlowsky JA. Thermostable DNase is superior to tube coagulase for direct detection of Staphylococcus aureus in positive blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45:3478–3479 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Eigner U, Veldenzer A, Holfelder M. Validation of the FluoroType® MRSA assay for the rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from patient material. J Microbiol Methods 2014; 107:71–73 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Maes N, Magdalena J, Rottiers S, De Gheldre Y, Struelens MJ. Evaluation of a triplex PCR assay to discriminate Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci and determine methicillin resistance from blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40:1514–1517 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. van Leeuwen W, Roorda L, Hendriks W, Francois P, Schrenzel J. A nuc-deficient methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2008; 54:157 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hoegh SV, Skov MN, Boye K, Worning P, Jensen TG et al. Variations in the Staphylococcus aureus-specific nuc gene can potentially lead to misidentification of meticillin-susceptible and -resistant S. aureus . J Med Microbiol 2014; 63:1020–1022 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Identification of Staphylococcus species, Micrococcus species and Rothia species UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations, Bacteriology, ID 7, Issue 3. London: Public Health England; 2014
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Eusebi P. Diagnostic accuracy measures. Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 36:267–272 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Madison BM, Baselski VS. Rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus in blood cultures by thermonuclease testing. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 18:722–724 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ratner HB, Stratton CW. Thermonuclease test for same-day identification of Staphylococcus aureus in blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1985; 21:995–996 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Megson GM, Law D, Ganguli LA. Problems of thermonuclease detection for identifying Staphylococcus aureus in blood culture broths. J Clin Pathol 1991; 44:772–774 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hu Y, Meng J, Shi C, Hervin K, Fratamico PM et al. Characterization and comparative analysis of a second thermonuclease from Staphylococcus aureus . Microbiol Res 2013; 168:174–182 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001166
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001166
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error