Bubonic plague: Doubts and diagnoses

References

1. Pye G. A discourse of the plague; wherein Dr Mead’s notions are consider’d and refuted. London: J. Darby; 17213–4
   [Google Scholar]
2. Yersin M. La peste bubonique à Hong-kong. Annales de Vlnstitut Pasteur 1894; 8:662–667
   [Google Scholar]
3. Kitasato S. The bacillus of bubonic plague. Lancet 1894; 2:428–430
   [Google Scholar]
4. Gatacre W. F. Report on the bubonic plague in Bombay. Bombay: Times of India; 189752
   [Google Scholar]
5. Dar L., Thakur R., Dar V. S. Indians it plague?. Lancet 1994; 344:13–59
   [Google Scholar]
6. John T. J. India: is it plague?. Lancet 1994; 344:1359–1360
   [Google Scholar]
7. Twigg G. The Black Death: a biological reappraisal. London: Batsford; 1984
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hatcher J. BBC “Timewatch”; 1983
9. Hatcher J., Inweightman G. “Maybe the black rat didn’t do it”. The Independent on Sunday, 9 October 1994
   [Google Scholar]
10. Twigg G. Plague in London: spatial and temporal aspects of mortality. In Champion J. A. I. (ed) Epidemic disease in London Centre for Metropolitan History, working papers series, no. 1 University of London, Institute of Historical Research; 19931–17
    [Google Scholar]
11. Shrewsbury J. F. D. A history of bubonic plague in the British Isles. Cambridge University Press; 1970; 50463
    [Google Scholar]
12. Boghurst W. Loimographia: an account of the great plague of London in the year 1665. London: Shaw and Sons; 189421–23 (Printed for the Epidemiological Society of London from the British Museum Sloane MS.349)
    [Google Scholar]