1887

Abstract

Summary

The potential of a particle counting immunoassay (PACIA) for the direct detection of serogroup G specific antigen in faecal specimens was evaluated. F(ab′) fragments from a rabbit anti-serogroup G antiserum were covalently coupled to carboxylated latex beads. This reagent was mixed with acid extracts of faecal specimens and the reaction was assayed with an optical counter which discriminated unagglutinated from agglutinated latex particles. Culture for . , faecal cytotoxin detection, PACIA and serogrouping of . isolates were performed on 249 stools. Of the 71 culture-negative specimens, none gave a positive result in the cytotoxin assay or in PACIA. Faecal cytotoxin was detected in 100 of the 178 culture-positive specimens. PACIA was positive for 63 of the 71 faecal specimens that yielded serogroup G . on culture. PACIA gave negative results for all other culture-positive stools tested with one exception, from which a serogroup A7 . strain was isolated. PACIA detection of serogroup G antigen in faecal specimens showed a sensitivity of 88·7%, a specificity of 99·7%, a predictive value of a positive culture with a serogroup G strain of 98·4%, and a predictive value for specimens that were culture-negative for a serogroup G strain of 95·6%. The results indicate that PACIA with specific antiserum is a rapid and reliable method for detecting serogroup specific antigens of . in faecal specimens. Clinical applications of the method are discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-40-4-270
1994-04-01
2022-05-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/40/4/medmicro-40-4-270.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-40-4-270&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Delmée M, Homel M, Wauters G. Serogrouping of Clostridium difficile strains by slide agglutination. J Clin Microbiol 1985; 21:323–327
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Tabaqchali S, Holland D, O’Farrell S, Silman R. Typing scheme for Clostridium difficile: its application in clinical and epidemiological studies. Lancet 1984; 1:935–938
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Heard SR, O’Farrell S, Holland D, Crook S, Barnett MJ, Tabaqchali S. The epidemiology of Clostridium difficile with use of a typing scheme: nosocomial aquisition and cross-infection among immunocompromised patients. J Infect Dis 1986; 153:159–162
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Delmée M, Bulliard G, Simon G. Application of a serogrouping technique for Clostridium difficile in an outbreak of antibiotic associated diarrhoea. J Infect 1986; 13:5–10
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kuijper EJ, Oudbier JH, Stuifbergen WN, Jansz A, Zanen HC. Application of whole-cell DNA restriction endonuclease profiles to the epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-induced diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol 1987; 25:751–753
    [Google Scholar]
  6. McFarland LV, Mulligan ME, Kwok RYY, Stamm WE. Nosocomial acquisition of Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med 1989; 320:204–210
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Clabots CR, Peterson LR, Gerding DN. Characterization of a nosocomial Clostridium difficile outbreak by using plasmid profile typing and clindamycin susceptibility testing. J Infect Dis 1988; 158:731–736
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Barbut F, Depitre C, Delmée M, Corthier G, Petit J-C. Comparison of enterotoxin production, cytotoxin production, serogrouping, and antimicrobial susceptibilities of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from AIDS and human immunodeficiency virus-negative patients. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31:740–742
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Depitre C, Delmée M, Avesani V. Serogroup F strains of Clostridium difficile produce toxin B but no toxin A. J Med Microbiol 1993; 38:434–441
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Delmée M, Laroche Y, Avesani V, Cornells G. Comparison of serogrouping and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for typing Clostridium difficile . J Clin Microbiol 1986; 24:991–994
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Delmée M, Avesani V, Delferriere N, Burtonboy G. Characterization of flagella of Clostridium difficile and their role in serogrouping reactions. J Clin Microbiol 1990; 28:2210–2214
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Delmée M, Avesani V, Ernest I, Surleraux M. Detection of 19 specific antigens for ten serogroups of Clostridium difficile . Mol Cell Probes 1990; 4:1–10
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Masson PL, Cambiaso CL, Collet-Cassart D, Magnusson CGM, Richards CB, Sindic CJM. Particle counting immunoassay (PACIA). Methods Enzymol 1981; 74:106–139
    [Google Scholar]
  14. George WL, Sutter VL, Citron D, Finegold SM. Selective and differential medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile . J Clin Microbiol 1979; 9:214–219
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Galanti LM, Cambiaso CL, Cornu CJ, Lamy ME, Masson PL. Immunoassay of hepatitis B surface antigen by particle counting after pepsin digestion. J Virol Methods 1987; 18:215–224
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kamiya S, Nakamura S, Yamakawa K, Nishida S. Evaluation of a commercially available latex immunoagglutination test kit for detection of Clostridium difficile D-1 toxin. Microbiol Immunol 1986; 30:177–181
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kelly MT, Champagne SG, Sherlock CH, Noble MA, Freeman HJ, Smith JA. Commercial latex agglutination test for detection of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol 1987; 25:1244–1247
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lyerly DM, Wilkins TD. Commercial latex test for Clostridium difficile toxin A does not detect toxin A. J Clin Microbiol 1986; 23:622–623
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Borriello SP, Barclay FE, Reed PJ, Welch AR, Brown JD, Burdon DW. Analysis of latex agglutination test for Clostridium difficile toxin A (D-1) and differentiation between C difficile toxins A and B and latex reactive protein. J Clin Pathol 1987; 40:573–580
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Delmée M, Mackey T, Hamitou A. Evaluation of a new commercial Clostridium difficile toxin A enzyme immunoassay using diarrhoeal stools. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1992; 11:246–249
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Shanholtzer CJ, Willard KE, Holter JJ, Olson MM, Gerding DN, Peterson LR. Comparison of the VIDAS Clostridium difficile toxin A immunoassay with C difficile culture and cytotoxin and latex tests. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 30:1837–1840
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Barbut F, Kajzer C, Planas N, Petit J-C. Comparison of three enzyme immunoassays, a cytotoxicity assay, and toxigenic culture for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31:963–967
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Limet JN, Moussebois CH, Cambiaso CL, Vaerman JP, Masson PL. Particle counting immunoassay. IV. The use of F(ab′)2 fragments and N-chloracetyl lysine N-carboxy-anhydride for their coupling to polystyrene latex particles. J Immunol Methods 1979; 28:25–32
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Borriello SP, Honour P. Concomitance of cytotoxigenic and non-cytotoxigenic Clostridium difficile in stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 18:1006–1007
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Delmée M, Avesani V. Virulence of ten serogroups of Clostridium difficile in hamsters. J Med Microbiol 1990; 33:85–90
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Borriello SP, Barclay FE. Protection of hamsters against Clostridium difficile ileocaecitis by prior colonisation with non-pathogenic strains. J Med Microbiol 1985; 19:339–350
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Seal D, Borriello SP, Barclay F, Welch A, Piper M, Bonnycastle M. Treatment of relapsing Clostridium difficile diarrhoea by administration of a non-toxigenic strain. Eur J Clin Microbiol 1987; 6:51–53
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-40-4-270
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-40-4-270
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error