1887

Abstract

Summary

An indirect haemagglutination (IHA) test was performed with chick red blood cells (RBC) on sera from 26 confirmed cases of echinococcosis and 45 control sera. The results were compared with those obtained in an IHA test with sheep RBC on the same batches of sera; both tests were equally sensitive. The chick cells settled quickly and the results could be determined within 30-45 min. Heterophilic antigen was not a problem. This study also showed that chick cells stabilised by the doublealdehyde method, could be sensitised with the antigen and then stored at 4°C for up to 31 days before use in the IHA test without loss of sensitivity. The use of sensitised double-aldehyde stabilised (DAS) chick cells in IHA tests provides a rapid diagnostic test in echinococcosis.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-22-3-237
1986-11-01
2022-10-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/22/3/medmicro-22-3-237.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-22-3-237&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Arabatzis G., Papaganagiotou J. 1963; Laboratory tests in hydatid disease: a comparison of the indirect haemagglutination, complement-fixation and intradermal tests. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 28:266–268
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chemtai A. K., Bowry T. R., Ahmad Z. 1981; Evaluation of five immunodiagnostic techniques in echinococcosis patients. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 59:767–772
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Farshy D. C., Kagan I. G. 1972; Use of stable sensitized cells in indirect microhemagglutination test for malaria. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 21:868–872
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Herbert W. J. 1978; Passive haemagglutination with special reference to the tanned cell technique. In Weir D. M. (ed) Handbook of experimental immunology 3rd edn, Chapter 20 Blackwell; Oxford: p 1
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Iacona A., Pini C., Vicari G. 1980; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the serodiagnosis of hydatid disease. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 29:95–102
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mannen K., Ishikawa K., Tachibana J., Mifune K. 1984; Methods of increasing the sensitivity of the haemagglutination inhibition test for rabies virus antibody. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 62:883–892
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Parija S. C., Ananthakrishnan N. 1985; Evaluation of stabilised cells in the indirect haemagglutination test for echinococcosis. Journal of Medical Microbiology 19:95–98
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Singh M. 1980; Studies on human filariasis in Malaysia. The application of an indirect haemagglutination technique for immuno diagnosis. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 29:548–552
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Skaug K., Orstavik I., Ulstrup J. C. 1975; Application of the passive haemolysis test for the determination of rubella virus antibodies. Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica 583:367–372
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-22-3-237
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-22-3-237
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error