1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

A capsulate staphylococcus designated strain M is described. Apart from the presence of a capsule, this strain has most of the biological properties of typical strains of .

Strain M differs from modal strains of in its colonial morphology, resistance to bacteriophage, greater virulence for mice and failure to clump in plasma. These differences are attributed to the presence of a thick capsule.

Non-capsulate variants, produced by prolonged culture in nutrient broth, were indistinguishable from typical strains of , but reverted to the parent capsulate form when passaged in mice.

Strain M is compared with three heavily capsulate strains previously described, and with staphylococcus strain “ Smith ”, and the “ Smith-like ” strains of .

The capsulate strain M has been deposited in the National Collection of Type Cultures (no. 10649).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-2-3-253
1969-08-01
2022-08-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/2/3/medmicro-2-3-253.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-2-3-253&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alami S. Y., Kelly F. C. 1959 J. Bact 78:539
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baird-parker A. C. 1963 J. Gen. Microbiol 30:409
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Browning C. H., Mackie T. J. 1949; Textbook of bacteriology. London p. 785
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Burnet F. M. 1930 J. Path. Bact 33:1
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cadness-graves Bessie, Williams R., Harper G. J., Miles A. A. 1943 Lancet 1:736
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Duguid J. P. 1951 J. Path. Bact 63:673
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fisher M. W. 1957 Antibiotics Chemother 7:315
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fisk A. 1940 Br. J. Exp. Path 21:311
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gilbert Isabelle. 1931 J. Bact 21:157
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hendry E. B. 1948 Edinb. Med. J 55:142
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Henriksen S. D. 1948 Acta path, microbiol. scand 25:485
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hunt G. A., Moses A. J. 1958 Science N.Y. 128:1574
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Koenig M. G., Melly M. Ann. 1965 Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci 128:231
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lominski I., Smith D. D., Scott A. C., Arbuthnott J. P., Gray S., Muir D., Turner G. H., Hedges C. K. 1962 Lancet 1:1315
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Marmur J., Doty P. 1962 J. Molec. Biol 5:109
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Miles A. A., Misra S. S., Irwin J. O. 1938 J. Hyg., Camb 38:732
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Morse S. I. 1963 Nature, Lond 200:1126
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mudd S. 1965 Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci 128:45
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Oesterle P. 1936 Zentbl. Bakt. Abt. I, Orig 136:221
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Report 1965 Int. Bull. Bact. Nomencl. Taxon 15:109
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rogers D. E. 1962 J. Amer. Med. Assoc 181:38
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rogers D. E., Melly M. Ann. 1962 Yale J. Biol. Med 34:560
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Smith J. M., Dubos R. J. 1956 J. Exp. Med 103:87
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Tompsett R. 1961 In Antimicrobial agents and chemo therapy ed. by Finland M., Savage G. M. Detroit: p. 67
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Williams R. E. O. Rippon, Joan E. 1952 J. Hyg. Camb 50:320
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-2-3-253
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-2-3-253
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error