1887

Abstract

Mesophyll protoplasts from both susceptible and resistant hosts were inoculated with RNA purified from barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV) strains CV52 and CV42 using the polyethylene glycol (PEG) method. Protoplasts derived from the susceptible L. cv. Black Hulless were susceptible to both BSMV strains, as indicated by fluorescein isothiocyanate staining and ELISA. More than 80% of protoplasts derived from an oat cultivar resistant to CV52, but not to CV42, were readily infected by either CV52 or CV42. Protoplasts from 10 barley lines resistant to CV42 remained resistant to CV42, although a limited number of protoplasts were infected. Functional resistance in the cultured barley protoplasts, but not in those from oat plants, suggests that resistance in these barley lines may be the result of restriction of replication, whereas resistance in oat plants is more likely due to restriction of cell-to-cell movement.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-71-8-1865
1990-08-01
2021-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/71/8/JV0710081865.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-71-8-1865&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aoki S., Takebe I. 1969; Infection of tobacco mesophyll protoplasts by tobacco mosaic virus ribonucleic acid. Virology 39:439–448
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barker H., Harrison B. D. 1984; Expression of genes for resistance to potato virus Y in potato plants and protoplasts. Annals of Applied Biology 105:539–545
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beier H., Siler D. J., Russell M. L., Bruening G. 1977; Survey of susceptibility to cowpea mosaic virus among protoplasts and intact plants from Vigna sinensislines. Phytopathology 67:917–921
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Beier H., Bruening G., Russell M. L., Tucker C. L. 1979; Replication of cowpea mosaic virus in protoplasts isolated from immune lines of cowpea. Virology 95:165–175
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark M. F., Adams A. N. 1977; Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. Journal of General Virology 34:475–483
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Coutts R. H. A., Wood K. R. 1977; Inoculation of leaf mesophyll protoplasts from a resistant and a susceptible cultivar with cucumber mosaic virus. FEMS Microbiology Letters 1:121–124
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Edwards M. C., Timian R. G. 1986; Genetic analysis of barley stripe mosaic virus. Phytopathology 76:360–365
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Foxe M. J., Prakash J. 1986; Expression of resistance to potato virus X in isolated potato protoplasts. Archives of Virology 88:167–174
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gonda T. J., Symons R. H. 1979; Cucumber mosaic virus replication in cowpea protoplasts: time course of virus, coat protein and RNA synthesis. Journal of General Virology 45:723–736
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hughes B. G., White F. G., Smith M. A. 1978; Effect of plant growth, isolation and purification conditions on barley protoplast yield. Biochemie und Physiologie der Pflanzen 172:67–77
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jackson A. O., Hunter B. G., Gustafson G. D. 1989; Hordeivirus relationships and genome organization. Annual Review of Phytopathology 27:95–121
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Loesch-Fries L. S., Hall T. C. 1982; In vivoaminoacylation of brome mosaic and barley stripe mosaic virus RNAs. Nature; London: 298771–773
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Maekawa K., Furusawa I., Okuno T. 1981; Effects of actinomycin D and ultraviolet irradiation on multiplication of brome mosaic virus in host and non-host cells. Journal of General Virology 53:353–356
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Maule A. J., Boulton M. I., Wood K. R. 1980; Resistance of cucumber protoplasts to cucumber mosaic virus: a comparative study. Journal of General Virology 51:271–279
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Meshi T., Motoyoshi F., Adachi A., Watanabe Y., Takamatsu N., Okada Y. 1988; Two concomitant base substitutions in the putative replicase genes of tobacco mosaic virus confer the ability to overcome the effects of a tomato resistance gene, Tm-1 . EMBO Journal 7:1575–1581
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Meshi T., Motoyoshi F., Maeda T., Yoshiwoka S., Watanabe H., Okada Y. 1989; Mutations in the tobacco mosaic virus 30-kD protein gene overcome Tm-2 resistance in tomato. Plant Cell 1:515–522
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Motoyoshi F., Oshima N. 1975; Infection with tobacco mosaic virus of leaf mesophyll protoplasts from susceptible and resistant lines of tomato. Journal of General Virology 29:81–91
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Motoyoshi F., Oshima N. 1977; Expression of genetically controlled resistance to tobacco mosaic virus infection in isolated tomato leaf mesophyll protoplasts. Journal of General Virology 34:499–506
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Petty I. T. D., Hunter B. G., Wei N., Jackson A. O. 1989; Infectious barley stripe mosaic virus RNA transcribed in vitrofrom full-length genomic cDNA clones. Virology 171:342–349
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Stobbs L. W., Macneill B. H. 1980; Response to tobacco mosaic virus of a tomato cultivar homozygous for gene Tm-2 . Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 1:5–11
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Timian R. G. 1975; Barley stripe mosaic virus and the world collection of barleys. Plant Disease Reporter 59:984–988
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Timian R. G., Franckowiak J. D. 1987; Location of a factor for barley stripe mosaic virus reaction on chromosome 1. Barley Genetics Newsletter 17:79–82
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Watanabe Y., Kishibayashi N., Motoyoshi F., Okada Y. 1987; Characterization of Tm-1gene action on replication of common isolates and a resistance-breaking isolate of TMV. Virology 161:527–532
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Widholm J. M. 1972; The use of fluorescein diacetate and phenosafranine for determining viability of cultured cells. Stain Technology 47:189–194
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Wood K. R. 1984; Tissue culture methods in phytopathology I-viruses. In Plant Cell Culture: A Practical Approach pp 193–214 Dixon R. A. Edited by Oxford: IRL Press;
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-71-8-1865
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-71-8-1865
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error