1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: A method of isolating species of Dictyosteliaceae from soil and other substrates is described.

Of ninety-three different strains of bacteria tested as food for and , some were readily or slowly but completely eaten, others were partly eaten and the rest were inedible. No correlation between the edibility of the bacteria and the formation of normal fruiting bodies could be found. More Gram-negative than Gram-positive strains were edible, and non-pigmented bacteria proved more suitable than pigmented bacteria for the normal development of spp.

Values of pH between 4·1 and 8·9 had no effect on the abundance or on the types of fruiting bodies produced in either or when suitable strains of bacteria were supplied as food to the myxamoebae on non-nutrient agar.

The maximum dimensions and the form of sorocarps and occasionally the colour of the sori were influenced by the type of bacteria used as food supplies. The influence of the bacterial food supply on the classification of Acrasieae is discussed and one new species () is described.

Species of are frequently present in arable soils in Great Britain. The common occurrence of spp. in soils, which have been unmanured or treated with artificial fertilizers only for 100 years or more, disproves the belief that spp. are dung organisms.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-1-1-11
1947-01-01
2022-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/1/1/mic-1-1-11.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-1-1-11&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Brefeld O. 1869; Dictyostelium mucoroides. Ein neuer Organismus aus der Verwandschaft der Myxomyceten. Abh. Senckenb. naturf. Ges 7:85
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brefeld O. 1884; Polysphondylium violaceum und Dictyostelium mucoroides nebst Bemerkungen zur Systematik der Schleimpilze. Untersuch. Gesammt. Mykol 6:1
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Krzemieniewski H., S.. 1927; Z Mikroflory gleby w Polsce (Contribution à la microflore du sol en Pologne). Acta Soc. Bot. Polon 4:141
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Olive E. W. 1901; A preliminary enumeration of the Sorophorae. Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts Sci 37:333
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Raper K. B. 1935; Dictyostelium discoideum, a new species of slime mold from decaying forest leaves. J. agric. Res 50:135
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Raper K. B. 1937; Growth and development of Dictyostelium discoideum with different bacterial associates. J. agric. Res 55:289
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Raper K. B. 1939; Influence of cultural conditions upon the growth and development of Dictyostelium discoideum. J. agric. Res 58:157
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Raper K. B. 1940a; The communal nature of the fruiting process in the Acrasieae. Amer. J. Bot 27:436
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Raper K. B. 1940b; Pseudoplasmodium formation and organization in Dictyostelium discoideum. J. Elisha Mitchell sci. Soc 56:241
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Raper K. B. 1941; Dictyostelium minutum, a second new species of slime mold from decaying forest leaves. Mycologia 33:633
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Raper K. B., Smith N. R. 1939; The growth of Dictyostelium discoideum upon pathogenic bacteria. J. Bact 38:431
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Raper K. B., Thom C. 1932; The distribution of Dictyostelium and other slime molds in soil. J. Wash. Acad. Sci 28:93
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Raper K. B., Thom C. 1941; Interspecific mixtures in the Dictyosteliaceae. Amer. J. Bot 28:69
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Singh B. N. 1941; Selectivity in bacterial food by soil amoebae in pure mixed culture and in sterilized soil. Ann. appl. Biol 28:52
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Singh B. N. 1942; Selectivity in bacterial food by soil flagellates and amoebae. Ann. appl. Biol 29:18
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Singh B. N. 1945; The selection of bacterial food by soil amoebae, and the toxic effects of bacterial pigments and other products on soil Protozoa. Brit. J. exp. Path 26:316
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Singh B. N. 1946a; A method of estimating the number of soil Protozoa, especially amoebae, based on differential feeding of bacteria by Protozoa. Ann. appl. Biol 33:112
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Singh B. N. 1946b; Silica jelly as a substrate for counting holozoic Protozoa. Nature; Lond: 157302
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Singh B. N. 1946c; Soil Acrasieae and their bacterial food supply. Nature; Lond: 157133
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Singh B. N. 1947; Myxobacteria in soils and composts; their distribution, number and lytic action on bacteria. J. gen. Microbial 1:1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-1-1-11
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-1-1-11
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error