1887

Abstract

Enterococci, especially , are one of today’s leading causes of multidrug-resistant infections in hospital settings. The marine environment may harbour enterococci, but its role as an evolutionary niche and as a vector for the spread of enterococci is sparsely investigated. Hence, by applying enterococci in bivalves as a sentinel tool, this study aimed to describe the prevalence of enterocooci along the Norwegian coast and in addition the phylogeny of in particular. Enterococci in batch samples of marine bivalves, harvested from 86 different locations, were quantitatively examined by a culture-dependent most probable number (MPN) method. Isolates were identified by MALDI-TOF-MS prior to antimicrobial susceptibility testing by broth microdilution. In-detail analyses of a representative selection of isolates (=148) were done by Illumina whole-genome sequencing, and assembled genomes were compared to closed genomes in the public databases and to genomes from commensal and clinical isolates from Norway. Diversity among within the same batch sample of bivalves was also explored. Enterococci were detected in 287 of the 471 examined bivalve samples, but in low concentrations with a median value of <18 MPN /100 g. From positive samples, 479 isolates of enterococci were identified belonging to ten different species, where (=247), (=114) and (=66) were most frequently found. Resistance towards one or more antimicrobial agents was observed in 197 isolates (41 %), none of the isolates showed acquired resistance to vancomycin or linezolid. Phylogenetic analyses revealed high diversity among the isolates and showed that the marine niche is dominated by strains from the non-clinical setting belonging to clade A2 (=85) and B () (=60). Only three isolates belonged to the hospital-associated clade A1 (ST80 and ST117). Two of these clustered with one isolate from a hospitalized patient and one from a non-hospitalized person. This study demonstrated a high prevalence, but low concentrations of enterococci in bivalves, and low levels of antimicrobial resistance. genomes showed high population diversity and that very few isolates in bivalves may have arisen from the human healthcare system. A systematic surveillance of target micro-organisms applying methods examining multiple isolates from the same bivalve sample provides important data to assess the enterococcal phylogeny, antimicrobial resistance and the level of faecal pollution in the marine environment.

  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001154
2023-12-12
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/9/12/mgen001154.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001154&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Agudelo Higuita NI, Huycke MM. Enterococcal Disease, Epidemiology, and Implications for Treatment. In Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N. eds Enterococci: From Commensals to Leading Causes of Drug Resistant Infection Boston: 2014
    [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization Worldwide Country Situation Analysis: Response to Antimicrobial Resistance 2015 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Clewell DB, Clewell KE, Dunny GM, Coque TM, Francia MV et al. Extrachromosomal and mobile elements in Enterococci - transmission, maintenance, and epidemiology. NLM 2014
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Vignaroli C, Pasquaroli S, Citterio B, Di Cesare A, Mangiaterra G et al. Antibiotic and heavy metal resistance in enterococci from coastal marine sediment. Environ Pollut 2018; 237:406–413 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lebreton F, Van schaik W, Mcguire AM, Godfrey P, Griggs A et al. Emergence of epidemic multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium from animal and commensal strains. mBio 2013; 4: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Rothenheber D, Jones S. Enterococcal concentrations in a coastal ecosystem are a function of fecal source input, environmental conditions, and environmental sources. Appl Environ Microbiol 2018; 84:e01038-18 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fujioka RS, Hashimoto HH, Siwak EB, Young RH. Effect of sunlight on survival of indicator bacteria in seawater. Appl Environ 1981; 41:690–696 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Rozen Y, Belkin S. Survival of enteric bacteria in seawater. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2001; 25:513–529 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Byappanahalli MN, Nevers MB, Korajkic A, Staley ZR, Harwood VJ. Enterococci in the environment. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2012; 76:685–706 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lunestad BT, Frantzen S, Svanevik CS, Roiha IS, Duinker A. Time Trends in the Prevalence of Escherichia coli and Enterococci in Bivalves Harvested in Norway During 2007–2012 2015 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cranford PJ. Bivalve filter feeding: variability and limits of the aquaculture biofilter. Shellfish Aquaculture and the Environment 201181–124 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. European Commission Regulation (EC) No. 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Specific Rules for the Organisation of Official Controls on Products of Animal Origin Intended for Human Consumption 854/2004 Brussels, Belgium: The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union; 2004 pp 83–127
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Horner C, Mushtaq S, Allen M, Hope R, Gerver S et al. Replacement of Enterococcus faecalis by Enterococcus faecium as the predominant Enterococcus in UK Bacteraemias. JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance 2021; 3:dlab185
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Arredondo-Alonso S, Top J, Mcnally A, Puranen S, Pesonen M et al. Plasmids shaped the recent emergence of the major nosocomial pathogen Enterococcus faecium. mBio 2020; 11:mgen000488 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Belloso Daza MV, Cortimiglia C, Bassi D, Cocconcelli PS. Genome-based studies indicate that the Enterococcus faecium clade B strains belong to Enterococcus lactis species and lack of the hospital infection associated markers. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fioriti S, Coccitto SN, Cedraro N, Simoni S, Morroni G et al. Linezolid resistance genes in enterococci isolated from sediment and Zooplankton in two Italian coastal areas. Appl Environ Microbiol 2021; 87: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Morroni G, Di Cesare A, Di Sante L, Brenciani A, Vignaroli C et al. Enterococcus faecium ST17 from coastal marine sediment carrying transferable multidrug resistance plasmids. Microb Drug Resist 2016; 22:523–530 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Prichula J, Primon-Barros M, Luz RCZ, Castro IMS, Paim TGS et al. Genome mining for antimicrobial compounds in wild marine animals-associated enterococci. Mar Drugs 2021; 19: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Prichula J, Van Tyne D, Schwartzman J, Sant’anna FH, Pereira RI et al. Enterococci from wild magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) as an indicator of marine ecosystem health and human impact. Appl Environ Microbiol 2020; 86: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sacramento AG, Fernandes MR, Sellera FP, Dolabella SS, Zanella RC et al. VanA-type vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium ST1336 isolated from mussels in an anthropogenically impacted ecosystem. Mar Pollut Bull 2019; 142:533–536 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Cassini A, Högberg LD, Plachouras D, Quattrocchi A, Hoxha A et al. Attributable deaths and disability-adjusted life-years caused by infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the EU and the European Economic Area in 2015: a population-level modelling analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2019; 19:56–66 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. NORM/NORM-VET 2021 Usage of Antimicrobial Agents and Occurrence of Antimicrobial Resistance in Norway. Tromsø/Oslo 2022. ISSN: 1502-2307 (print) /1890-9965 (electronic). 2022
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hegstad K, Janice J, Sundsfjord A, Elstrøm P, Kacelnik O. Vancomycin and linezolid resistant enterococci in Norway 2020. In NORM/NORM-VET: Usage of Antimicrobial Agents and Occurrence of Antimicrobial Resistance in Norway. Tromsø/Oslo 2021. ISSN: 1502-2307 (print) / 1890-9965 (electronic).
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Duinker A, Storesund J, Lunestad BT, Sanden M. Nasjonalt Tilsynsprogram for Produksjon Av Skjell Og andre Bløtdyr – Prøver Analysert i 2019 for Kjemiske Forurensende Stoffer Og 2020
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ISO 16649-3 2005 Microbiology of the food chain - Horizontal method for the enumeration of beta-glucuronidase-positive Escherichia coli - Part 3: Detection and most probable number technique using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-glucuronide. Geneva, Switserland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO). n.d
  27. Martin CC, Svanevik CS, Lunestad BT, Sekse C, Johannessen GS. Isolation and characterisation of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli from Norwegian Bivalves. Food Microbiol 2019; 84:103268
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hartman PA, Deibel RH, Sieverding LM. Compendium of Methods for The Microbiological Examination of Foods 2001 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Zimbro MJ, Power DA. Difco & BBL Manual - Manual of Microbiological Culture Media 2003
    [Google Scholar]
  30. NMKL 2011 Enterococcus. Bestemmelse i Næringsmidler og Fôr (NMKL 68). In Nordisk Metodikkommitté För Livsmedel
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Donovan TJ, Gallacher S, Andrews NJ, Greenwood MH, Graham J et al. Modification of the Standard Method Used in the United Kingdom for Counting Escherichia coli in Live Bivalve Molluscs 1998
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kim E, Yang SM, Kim HJ, Kim HJ. Differentiating between Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis by matrix-assisted laser desorption Ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Foods 2022; 11:1046 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. EUCAST Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters v 12.0 2022
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2114–2120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Front Microbiol 2013; 29:1072–1075 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Feldgraden M, Brover V, Haft DH, Prasad AB, Slotta DJ et al. Validating the Armfinder tool and resistance gene database by using antimicrobial resistance genotype-phenotype correlations in a collection of isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 201963–127
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Seemann T. ABRicate - mass screening of contigs for antimicrobial resistance or virulence genes; 2020 https://github.com/tseemann/abricate
  39. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W293–W296 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Treangen TJ, Ondov BD, Koren S, Phillippy AM. The Harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes. Genome Biol 2014; 15:524 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Jolley KA, Maiden MCJ. BIGSdb: Scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:595 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. GMBH R. SeqSphere+; 2020 https://www.ridom.de/seqsphere/
  43. de Been M, Pinholt M, Top J, Bletz S, Mellmann A et al. Core genome multilocus sequence typing scheme for high- resolution typing of Enterococcus faecium. J Clin Microbiol 2015; 53:3788–3797 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lebreton F, Manson AL, Saavedra JT, Straub TJ, Earl AM et al. Tracing the enterococci from paleozoic origins to the hospital. Cell 2017; 169:849–861
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Belloso Daza MV, Almeida-Santos AC, Novais C, Read A, Alves V et al. Distinction between Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus lactis by a gluP PCR-based assay for accurate identification and diagnostics. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10:e03268-22
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Willems RJ, Top J, Van Schaik W, Leavis H, Bonten M et al. Restricted gene flow among hospital subpopulations of Enterococcus faecium. mBio 2012; 3:e00151-12 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Gouliouris T, Raven KE, Ludden C, Blane B, Corander J et al. Genomic surveillance of Enterococcus faecium reveals limited sharing of strains and resistance genes between livestock and humans in the United Kingdom. mBio 2018; 9: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Grevskott DH, Svanevik CS, Sunde M, Wester AL, Lunestad BT et al. Marine bivalve mollusks as possible indicators of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and other species of the Enterobacteriaceae family. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:24 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Freire S, Grilo T, Rodrigues B, Oliveira R, Esteves C et al. ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae among bivalves from portuguese shellfish production areas. Microorganisms 2023; 11:415 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Svanevik CS, Norström M, Lunestad BT, Slettemeås JS, Urdahl AM. From tide to table: a whole-year, coastal-wide surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli from marine bivalves. Int J Food Microbiol 2023; 407:110422 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001154
Loading
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001154
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

EXCEL

Supplementary material 2

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error