1887

Abstract

For positive-sense RNA viruses, initiation of viral RNA replication represents a major target of antiviral responses to infection. Despite this, the interplay between viral replication and the innate antiviral response at early steps in the Zika virus (ZIKV) life cycle is not well understood. We have previously identified ZIKV isolates with differing levels of dsRNA accumulation, ZIKV (high dsRNA per infected cell) and ZIKV (low dsRNA per infected cell), and we hypothesized that we could use reverse genetics to investigate how host and viral factors contribute to the establishment of viral RNA replication. We found that both the ZIKV NS3 and NS5 proteins as well as host factors were necessary to determine the dsRNA accumulation phenotype. Additionally, we show that dsRNA correlates with viral negative-strand RNA measured by strand-specific RT-qPCR, suggesting that dsRNA is an accurate readout of viral RNA replication. Interestingly, although we did not observe NS3- and NS5-dependent differences in cells with defects in interferon (IFN) production, differences in RNA accumulation precede induction of the IFN response, suggesting that RNA sensing pathways or intrinsic restriction factors may differentially restrict ZIKV in an NS3- and NS5-dependent manner. This work expands our understanding of the interplay of early steps of viral RNA replication and the induction of the innate antiviral response to ZIKV infection.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Award RGPIN-2020-04713)
    • Principle Award Recipient: SelenaM Sagan
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Award PJT-162212)
    • Principle Award Recipient: SelenaM Sagan
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.001855
2023-06-07
2024-05-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/104/6/jgv001855.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.001855&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Honda K, Takaoka A, Taniguchi T. Type I interferon [corrected] gene induction by the interferon regulatory factor family of transcription factors. Immunity 2006; 25:349–360 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Wu J, Chen ZJ. Innate immune sensing and signaling of cytosolic nucleic acids. Annu Rev Immunol 2014; 32:461–488 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Schneider WM, Chevillotte MD, Rice CM. Interferon-stimulated genes: a complex web of host defenses. Annu Rev Immunol 2014; 32:513–545 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang W, Xu L, Su J, Peppelenbosch MP, Pan Q. Transcriptional regulation of antiviral interferon-stimulated genes. Trends Microbiol 2017; 25:573–584 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Miorin L, Maestre AM, Fernandez-Sesma A, García-Sastre A. Antagonism of type I interferon by Flaviviruses. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2017; 492:587–596 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Grandvaux N, Servant MJ, tenOever B, Sen GC, Balachandran S et al. Transcriptional profiling of interferon regulatory factor 3 target genes: direct involvement in the regulation of interferon-stimulated genes. J Virol 2002; 76:5532–5539 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Doğanay S, Lee MY, Baum A, Peh J, Hwang S-Y et al. Single-cell analysis of early antiviral gene expression reveals a determinant of stochastic IFNB1 expression. Integr Biol 2017; 9:857–867 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chang C, Ortiz K, Ansari A, Gershwin ME. The Zika outbreak of the 21st century. J Autoimmun 2016; 68:1–13 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Barnard TR, Abram QH, Lin QF, Wang AB, Sagan SM. Molecular determinants of Flavivirus virion assembly. Trends Biochem Sci 2021; 46:378–390 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Weber F, Wagner V, Rasmussen SB, Hartmann R, Paludan SR. Double-stranded RNA is produced by positive-strand RNA viruses and DNA viruses but not in detectable amounts by negative-strand RNA viruses. J Virol 2006; 80:5059–5064 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhao B, Yi G, Du F, Chuang Y-C, Vaughan RC et al. Structure and function of the Zika virus full-length NS5 protein. Nat Commun 2017; 8:14762 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Wengler G, Wengler G, Gross HJ. Studies on virus-specific nucleic acids synthesized in vertebrate and mosquito cells infected with Flaviviruses. Virology 1978; 89:423–437 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Du Pont KE, McCullagh M, Geiss BJ. Conserved motifs in the Flavivirus NS3 RNA helicase enzyme. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 2022; 13:e1688 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Klema VJ, Padmanabhan R, Choi KH. Flaviviral replication complex: coordination between RNA synthesis and 5’-RNA capping. Viruses 2015; 7:4640–4656 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chaudhary V, Yuen K-S, Chan JF-W, Chan C-P, Wang P-H et al. Selective activation of type II interferon signaling by Zika virus NS5 protein. J Virol 2017; 91:14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Grant A, Ponia SS, Tripathi S, Balasubramaniam V, Miorin L et al. Zika virus targets human STAT2 to inhibit type I interferon signaling. Cell Host Microbe 2016; 19:882–890 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kumar A, Hou S, Airo AM, Limonta D, Mancinelli V et al. Zika virus inhibits type-I interferon production and downstream signaling. EMBO Rep 2016; 17:1766–1775 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Li A, Wang W, Wang Y, Chen K, Xiao F et al. NS5 conservative site is required for Zika virus to restrict the RIG-I signaling. Front Immunol 2020; 11:51 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lin S, Yang S, He J, Guest JD, Ma Z et al. Zika virus NS5 protein antagonizes type I interferon production via blocking TBK1 activation. Virology 2019; 527:180–187 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Wu Y, Liu Q, Zhou J, Xie W, Chen C et al. Zika virus evades interferon-mediated antiviral response through the co-operation of multiple nonstructural proteins in vitro. Cell Discov 2017; 3:17006 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Riedl W, Acharya D, Lee J-H, Liu G, Serman T et al. Zika virus NS3 mimics a cellular 14-3-3-binding motif to antagonize RIG-I- and MDA5-mediated innate immunity. Cell Host Microbe 2019; 26:493–503 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Van Eyndhoven LC, Singh A, Tel J. Decoding the dynamics of multilayered stochastic antiviral IFN-I responses. Trends Immunol 2021; 42:824–839 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Talemi SR, Höfer T. Antiviral interferon response at single-cell resolution. Immunol Rev 2018; 285:72–80 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Bruurs LJM, Müller M, Schipper JG, Rabouw HH, Boersma S et al. Heterogeneity in viral replication dynamics shapes the antiviral response. Immunology [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Overby AK, Popov VL, Niedrig M, Weber F. Tick-borne encephalitis virus delays interferon induction and hides its double-stranded RNA in intracellular membrane vesicles. J Virol 2010; 84:8470–8483 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Barnard TR, Rajah MM, Sagan SM. Contemporary Zika virus isolates induce more dsRNA and produce more negative-strand intermediate in human astrocytoma cells. Viruses 2018; 10:728 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Chahal J, Gebert LFR, Camargo C, MacRae IJ, Sagan SM. miR-122-based therapies select for three distinct resistance mechanisms based on alterations in RNA structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2021; 118:33 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu R, Olano LR, Mirzakhanyan Y, Gershon PD, Moss B. Vaccinia virus ankyrin-repeat/F-box protein targets interferon-induced IFITs for proteasomal degradation. Cell Rep 2019; 29:816–828 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Yun S-I, Song B-H, Frank JC, Julander JG, Olsen AL et al. Functional genomics and immunologic tools: the impact of viral and host genetic variations on the outcome of Zika virus infection. Viruses 2018; 10:422 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Shan C, Xie X, Muruato AE, Rossi SL, Roundy CM et al. An infectious cDNA clone of Zika virus to study viral virulence, mosquito transmission, and antiviral Inhibitors. Cell Host Microbe 2016; 19:891–900 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Barnard TR, Wang AB, Sagan SM. A highly sensitive strand-specific multiplex RT-qPCR assay for quantitation of Zika virus replication. J Virol Methods 2022; 307:114556 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Jaworska J, Gravel A, Fink K, Grandvaux N, Flamand L. Inhibition of transcription of the beta interferon gene by the human herpesvirus 6 immediate-early 1 protein. J Virol 2007; 81:5737–5748 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Bender S, Reuter A, Eberle F, Einhorn E, Binder M et al. Activation of type I and III interferon response by mitochondrial and peroxisomal MAVS and inhibition by hepatitis C Virus. PLoS Pathog 2015; 11:e1005264 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 2001; 25:402–408 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Basit A, Cho M-G, Kim E-Y, Kwon D, Kang S-J et al. The cGAS/STING/TBK1/IRF3 innate immunity pathway maintains chromosomal stability through regulation of p21 levels. Exp Mol Med 2020; 52:643–657 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu D, Wu H, Wang C, Li Y, Tian H et al. STING directly activates autophagy to tune the innate immune response. Cell Death Differ 2019; 26:1735–1749 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Machlin ES, Sarnow P, Sagan SM. Masking the 5’ terminal nucleotides of the hepatitis C virus genome by an unconventional microRNA-target RNA complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2011; 108:3193–3198 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Fonseca K, Meatherall B, Zarra D, Drebot M, MacDonald J et al. First case of Zika virus infection in a returning Canadian traveler. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2014; 91:1035–1038 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Rezelj VV, Carrau L, Merwaiss F, Levi LI, Erazo D et al. Defective viral genomes as therapeutic interfering particles against Flavivirus infection in mammalian and mosquito hosts. Nat Commun 2021; 12:2290 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Akiyama BM, Laurence HM, Massey AR, Costantino DA, Xie X et al. Zika virus produces noncoding RNAs using a multi-pseudoknot structure that confounds a cellular exonuclease. Science 2016; 354:1148–1152 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Slonchak A, Khromykh AA. Subgenomic Flaviviral RNAs: What do we know after the first decade of research. Antiviral Res 2018; 159:13–25 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Bidet K, Dadlani D, Garcia-Blanco MA. G3BP1, G3BP2 and CAPRIN1 are required for translation of interferon stimulated mRNAs and are targeted by a dengue virus non-coding RNA. PLoS Pathog 2014; 10:e1004242 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Emeny JM, Morgan MJ. Regulation of the interferon system: evidence that vero cells have a genetic defect in interferon production. J Gen Virol 1979; 43:247–252 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sumpter R, Loo Y-M, Foy E, Li K, Yoneyama M et al. Regulating intracellular antiviral defense and permissiveness to hepatitis C virus RNA replication through a cellular RNA helicase, RIG-I. J Virol 2005; 79:2689–2699 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Chew T, Noyce R, Collins SE, Hancock MH, Mossman KL. Characterization of the interferon regulatory factor 3-mediated antiviral response in a cell line deficient for IFN production. Mol Immunol 2009; 46:393–399 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Bowen JR, Quicke KM, Maddur MS, O’Neal JT, McDonald CE et al. Zika virus antagonizes type I interferon responses during infection of human dendritic cells. PLoS Pathog 2017; 13:e1006164 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Haller O, Kochs G. Human MxA protein: an interferon-induced dynamin-like GTPase with broad antiviral activity. J Interferon Cytokine Res 2011; 31:79–87 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Honda K, Taniguchi T. IRFs: master regulators of signalling by toll-like receptors and cytosolic pattern-recognition receptors. Nat Rev Immunol 2006; 6:644–658 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Diamond MS, Farzan M. The broad-spectrum antiviral functions of IFIT and IFITM proteins. Nat Rev Immunol 2013; 13:46–57 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Diamond MS. IFIT1: a dual sensor and effector molecule that detects non-2’-O methylated viral RNA and inhibits its translation. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2014; 25:543–550 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Fleith RC, Mears HV, Leong XY, Sanford TJ, Emmott E et al. IFIT3 and IFIT2/3 promote IFIT1-mediated translation inhibition by enhancing binding to non-self RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46:5269–5285 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Katibah GE, Qin Y, Sidote DJ, Yao J, Lambowitz AM et al. Broad and adaptable RNA structure recognition by the human interferon-induced tetratricopeptide repeat protein IFIT5. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2014; 111:12025–12030 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Pichlmair A, Lassnig C, Eberle C-A, Górna MW, Baumann CL et al. IFIT1 is an antiviral protein that recognizes 5’-triphosphate RNA. Nat Immunol 2011; 12:624–630 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Grimm D, Staeheli P, Hufbauer M, Koerner I, Martínez-Sobrido L et al. Replication fitness determines high virulence of influenza A virus in mice carrying functional Mx1 resistance gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007; 104:6806–6811 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Miorin L, Albornoz A, Baba MM, D’Agaro P, Marcello A. Formation of membrane-defined compartments by tick-borne encephalitis virus contributes to the early delay in interferon signaling. Virus Res 2012; 163:660–666 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Uchida L, Espada-Murao LA, Takamatsu Y, Okamoto K, Hayasaka D et al. The dengue virus conceals double-stranded RNA in the intracellular membrane to escape from an interferon response. Sci Rep 2014; 4:7395 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Hoenen A, Liu W, Kochs G, Khromykh AA, Mackenzie JM. West Nile virus-induced cytoplasmic membrane structures provide partial protection against the interferon-induced antiviral MxA protein. J Gen Virol 2007; 88:3013–3017 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Espada-Murao LA, Morita K. Delayed cytosolic exposure of Japanese encephalitis virus double-stranded RNA impedes interferon activation and enhances viral dissemination in porcine cells. J Virol 2011; 85:6736–6749 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Chazal M, Beauclair G, Gracias S, Najburg V, Simon-Lorière E et al. RIG-I recognizes the 5’ region of dengue and Zika virus genomes. Cell Rep 2018; 24:320–328 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Lee E, Bujalowski PJ, Teramoto T, Gottipati K, Scott SD et al. Structures of Flavivirus RNA promoters suggest two binding modes with NS5 polymerase. Nat Commun 2021; 12:2530 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Daffis S, Szretter KJ, Schriewer J, Li J, Youn S et al. 2’-O methylation of the viral mRNA cap evades host restriction by IFIT family members. Nature 2010; 468:452–456 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Chang DC, Hoang LT, Mohamed Naim AN, Dong H, Schreiber MJ et al. Evasion of early innate immune response by 2’-O-methylation of dengue genomic RNA. Virology 2016; 499:259–266 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Binder M, Quinkert D, Bochkarova O, Klein R, Kezmic N et al. Identification of determinants involved in initiation of hepatitis C virus RNA synthesis by using intergenotypic replicase chimeras. J Virol 2007; 81:5270–5283 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Teramoto T, Boonyasuppayakorn S, Handley M, Choi KH, Padmanabhan R. Substitution of NS5 N-terminal domain of dengue virus type 2 RNA with type 4 domain caused impaired replication and emergence of adaptive mutants with enhanced fitness. J Biol Chem 2014; 289:22385–22400 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Tay MYF, Saw WG, Zhao Y, Chan KWK, Singh D et al. The C-terminal 50 amino acid residues of dengue NS3 protein are important for NS3-NS5 interaction and viral replication. J Biol Chem 2015; 290:2379–2394 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Xu S, Ci Y, Wang L, Yang Y, Zhang L et al. Zika virus NS3 is a canonical RNA helicase stimulated by NS5 RNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:8693–8707 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Johansson M, Brooks AJ, Jans DA, Vasudevan SG. A small region of the dengue virus-encoded RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, NS5, confers interaction with both the nuclear transport receptor importin-beta and the viral helicase, NS3. J Gen Virol 2001; 82:735–745 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Tay MYF, Vasudevan SG. The transactions of NS3 and NS5 in Flaviviral RNA replication. Adv Exp Med Biol 2018; 1062:147–163 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Zou G, Chen Y-L, Dong H, Lim CC, Yap LJ et al. Functional analysis of two cavities in Flavivirus NS5 polymerase. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:14362–14372 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.001855
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.001855
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error