1887

Journal of General Virology header logo

Volume 78, Issue 2

Mutational analysis of the RNA-fork model of the influenza A virus vRNA promoter in vivo Free

Abstract

The genome of influenza A virus consists of eight negative-stranded RNA segments which have partially complementary non-coding terminal sequences. Previous transcription studies of the virion RNA promoter have shown that the 5′ terminus forms an integral part of the promoter and an ‘RNA-fork’ model has been proposed for the initiation of transcription. According to this model part of the promoter is formed by an RNA-duplex which involves complementary residues 10 to 12 of the 3′ end and residues 11′ to 13′ of the 5′ end. With a reverse genetics system, based on the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene, we have now tested this part of the promoter . Single mutations of the conserved residues at positions 11′ and 12 of the 3′ terminus and at positions 12′ and 13′ of the 5′ terminus abolished promoter activity. The introduction of complementary mutations into both termini partially restored activity. On the other hand, mutations at positions 10 of the 3′ terminus and 11′ of the 5′ terminus inhibited activity independently of whether a base- pair was formed or not. Thus, at these positions, the nature of the residues is apparently more important than their ability to form base-pairs. These results extend our previous virion ‘RNA-fork’ model and are consistent with findings that the 5′ terminus is involved in the initiation of transcription.

  • Published Online:
© Society for General Microbiology Ltd 1997
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-78-2-353
1997-02-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/78/2/9018057.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-78-2-353&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Desselberger U., Racaniello V. R., Zazra J. J., Palese P. 1980; The 3Ȳ and 5′ terminal sequences of influenza A, B and C virus RNA segments are highly conserved and show partial inverted complementarity. Gene 8:315–328
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Enami M., Luytjes W., Krystal M., Palese P. 1990; Introduction of site-specific mutations into the genome of influenza virus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA: 873802–3805
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Enami M., Palese P. 1991; High-efficiency formation of influenza virus transfectants. Journal of Virology 65: 2711–2713
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Fodor E., Seong B. L., Brownlee G. G. 1993; Photochemical crosslinking of influenza A polymerase to its virion RNA promoter defines a polymerase binding site at residues 9 to 12 of the promoter. Journal of General Virology 74:1327–1333
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Fodor E., Pritlove D. C., Brownlee G. G. 1994; The influenza virus panhandle is involved in the initiation of transcription. Journal of Virology 68:4092–4096
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Fodor E., Pritlove D. C., Brownlee G. G. 1995; Characterization of the RNA-fork model of virion RNA in the initiation of transcription in influenza A virus. Journal of Virology 69: 4012–4019
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Hagen M., Chung T. D. Y., Butcher J. A., Krystal M. 1994; Recombinant influenza virus polymerase: requirement of both 5′ and 3′ viral ends for endonuclease activity. Journal of Virology 68:1509–1515
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Honda A., Ueda K., Nagata K., Ishihama A. 1987; Identification of the RNA polymerase-binding site on genome RNA of influenza virus. Journal of Biochemistry 102:1241–1249
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Hsu M., Parvin J. D., Gupta S., Krystal M., Palese P. 1987; Genomic RNAs of influenza viruses are held in a circular conformation in virions and in infected cells by a terminal panhandle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA: 84 8140–8144
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Li X., Palese P. 1992; Characterization of the polyadenylation signal of influenza virus RNA. Journal of Virology 68:1245–1249
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Luo G., Luytjes W., Enami M., Palese P. 1991; The poly-adenylation signal of influenza virus RNA involves a stretch of uridine followed by the RNA duplex of the panhandle structure. Journal of Virology 65:2861–2867
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Luo G., Bergmann M., García-Sastre A., Palese P. 1992; Mechanism of attenuation of a chimeric influenza A/B transfectant virus. Journal of Virology 66:4679–4685
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Luytjes W., Krystal M., Enami M., Parvin J. D., Palese P. 1989; Amplification, expression, and packaging of a foreign gene by influenza virus. Cell 59:1107–1113
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Muster T., Subbarao E. K., Enami M., Murphy B. P., Palese P. 1991; An influenza A virus containing influenza B virus 5′ and 3′ noncoding regions of the neuraminidase gene is attenuated in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA: 885177–5181
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Neumann G., Hobom G. 1995; Mutational analysis of influenza virus promoter elements in vivo. Journal of General Virology 76:1709–1717
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Parvin J. D., Palese P., Ishihama A., Krystal M. 1989; Promoter analysis of the influenza virus RNA polymerase. Journal of Virology 63:5142–5152
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Piccone M. E., Fernandez-Sesma A., Palese P. 1993; Mutational analysis of the influenza virus vRNA promoters. Virus Research 28:99–112
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Pritlove D. C., Fodor E., Seong B. L., Brownlee G. G. 1995; In vitro transcription and polymerase binding studies of the termini of influenza A virus cRNA: evidence for a cRNA panhandle. Journal of General Virology 76:2205–2213
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Robertson J. S. 1979; 5′ and 3′ terminal nucleotide sequences of the RNA genome segments of influenza virus. Nucleic Acids Research 6:3745–3757
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Seong B. L., Brownlee G. G. 1992a; A new method for reconstituting influenza polymerase and RNA in vitro: a study of the promoter elements for cRNA and vRNA synthesis in vitro and viral rescue in vivo. Virology 186:247–260
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Seong B. L., Brownlee G. G. 1992b; Nucleotides 9 to 11 of the influenza A virion RNA promoter are crucial for activity in vitro. Journal of General Virology 73:3115–3124
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Seong B. L., Kobayashi M., Nagata K., Brownlee G. G., Ishihama A. 1992; Comparison of two reconstitution systems for in vitro transcription and replication of influenza virus. Journal of Biochemistry 111:496–499
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Tiley L. S., Hagen M., Matthews J. T., Krystal M. 1994; Sequence-specific binding of the influenza virus RNA polymerase to sequence located at the 5′ ends of the viral RNAs. Journal of Virology 68:5108–5116
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Yamanaka K., Ogasawara N., Yoshikawa H., Ishihama A., Nagata K. 1991; In vivo analysis of the promoter structure of the influenza virus RNA genome using a transfection system with an engineered RNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA: 885369–5373
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-78-2-353
Loading
Mutational analysis of the RNA-fork model of the influenza A virus vRNA promoter in vivo
J. Gen. Virol. 78, 353 (1997); https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-78-2-353
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-78-2-353
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-78-2-353
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error