1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Polypeptides of ‘trypsin-resistant’ (TR) variants of foot-and-mouth disease virus type O (BFS 1860) were analysed by electrofocusing and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. In contrast to parent O virus, trypsin treatment of these variants did not reduce their infectivity and their ability to attach to susceptible cells, although VP was cleaved as in the parent virus. In OTR, one of the cloned isolates, an additional polypeptide (VP) with a mol. wt. approx. 31 × 10 (31K), was found which resembled VP (28K) in being positively charged and cleaved by trypsinization of the virus into a neutral 18K polypeptide (P18) and a strongly basic fragment (pI > 10) with a mol. wt. of approx. 6K (P6). These findings substantiate the hypothesis that VP is an elongated VP. While P18 fragments of both trypsin-treated parent virus and OTR progeny viruses focused at identical (neutral) pH. P6 fragments of trypsinized OTR variants (including OTR) were even more positively charged than P6 of parent virus. This difference in charge of the P6 polypeptide may be responsible for the retained cell attachment ability of trypsinized OTR viruses. The data are discussed with respect to the known amino acid sequence of VP of the closely related O Kaufbeuren.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-62-2-357
1982-10-01
2022-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/62/2/JV0620020357.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-62-2-357&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Barteling S. J., Meloen R. H., Wagenaar F., Gielkens A. L. J. 1979; Isolation and characterization of trypsin-resistant O, variants of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Journal of General Virology 43:383–393
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown F., Cartwright B., Stewart D. L. 1963; The effect of various inactivating agents on the viral and ribonucleic acid infectivities of foot-and-mouth disease virus and on its attachment of susceptible cells. Journal of General Microbiology 31:179–186
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Crowther J. R. 1977; Examination of differences between foot-and-mouth disease strains using a radio immuno assay technique. International Symposium on Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus, Lyon 1976. Developments in Biological Standardization 35:185–193
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamann A., Wiegers K. J., Drzeniek R. 1977; Isoelectric focussing and 2D-analysis of poliovirus proteins. Virology 78:359–362
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kerckaert J. P. 1978; Highly simplified analytical or preparative slab gel electrophoresis. Analytical Biochemistry 84:354–360
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kitamura N., Semler B. L., Rothberg P. G., Larsen G. R., Adler C. J., Dorner A. J., Emini E. A., Hanecak R., Lee J.J., Van Der Werf S., Anderson C. W., Wimmer E. 1981; Primary structure, gene organization and polypeptide expression of poliovirus RNA. Nature, London 291:547–553
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kleid D. G., Yansura D., Small B., Dowbenko B., Moore D. M., Grubman M. J., McKercher P. D., Morgan O. O., Robertson B. H., Bachrach H. L. 1981; The cloned foot-and-mouth disease viral protein VP3 expressed in E. coli elicits protective immunogenic responses in cattle and swine. Sciences 214:1125–1129
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kurz C., Forss S., Küpper H., Strohmaier K., Schaller H. 1981; Nucleotide sequence and corresponding amino acid sequence of the gene for the major antigen of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Nucleic Acids Research 9:1919–1931
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Laemmli U. K. 1970; Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, London 227:680–685
    [Google Scholar]
  10. O’farrell P. Z., Goodman H. M., O’farrell P. H. 1977; High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of basic as well as acidic proteins. Cell 12:1133–1142
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Robson K. J. H., Crowther J. R., King A. M. Q., Brown F. 1979; Comparative biochemical and serological analysis of five isolates of a single serotype of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Journal of General Virology 37:271–276
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Rowlands D. J., Sangar D. V., Brown F. 1971; Relationship of the antigenic structure of foot-and-mouth disease virus to the process of infection. Journal of Virology 13:85–93
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Sangar D. V., Black D. N., Rowlands D. J., Brown F. 1977; Biochemical mapping of the foot-and-mouth disease virus genome. Journal of General Virology 35:281–297
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Strohmaier K., Franze R., Adam K.-H. 1982; Location and characterization of the antigenic portion of the FMDV immunizing protein. Journal of General Virology 59:295–306
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Wilson J. A., Skehel J. J., Wiley D. C. 1980; Structure of the haemagglutinin membrane glycoprotein of influenza virus at 3 á resolution. Nature, London 289:366–373
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-62-2-357
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-62-2-357
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error