1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Particles of 17 isolates of viruses from were purified and the virus relationships assessed by different serological techniques. From the reaction end-points of antisera in agar gel double diffusion tests the serological differentiation indices of reciprocal tests were calculated. These indices were used to construct a scheme of serological interrelationship. Spur formation tests were used to distinguish between closely related, non-identical viruses. The isolates were shown to belong to four groups, one of which (the cocksfoot mild mosaicpanicum mosaic virus group) contains most of the isolates and can be subdivided into two main clusters (typified by cocksfoot mild mosaic and panicum mosaic viruses, respectively). Additional information was obtained by immunoelectrophoresis of the viruses with their homologous antisera and by the determination of the mol. wt. of the coat protein subunits using SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The data obtained by both methods agree with the above mentioned results, although some minor differences were found between the immunoelectrophoretic patterns of panicum mosaic virus and its relatives and also the three isolates of Cynosurus mottle virus. Reversed rocket electrophoresis did not provide any information of use in virus grouping. Brome mosaic virus did not react with the antisera to the 17 viruses, but tobacco mosaic virus reacted weakly with all the antisera and also with one of the antisera to brome mosaic virus. These and other recently published results are discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-47-1-67
1980-03-01
2022-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/47/1/JV0470010067.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-47-1-67&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Axelsen N. H., Krøll J., Weeke B. (editors) 1973; A manual of quantitative immunoelectrophoresis. Universitetsforlaget Oslo: Bergen Tromso;
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bercks R., Querfurth G. 1971; Serologische Beziehungen zwischen einem gestreckten (tobacco mosaic) und einem isometrischen (cocksfoot mild mosaic) Virus. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 72:354–367
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Catherall P. L., Chamberlain J. A. 1977; Relationships, host-ranges and symptoms of some isolates of phleum mottle virus. Annals of applied Biology 87:147–157
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Koenig R. 1972; Anomalous behavior of the coat proteins of potato virus X and cactus virus X during electrophoresis in dodecyl sulfate-containing polyacrylamide gels. Virology 50:263–266
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Koenig R. 1976; A loop-structure in the serological classification system of Tymoviruses. Virology 72:1–5
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Koenig R., Stegemann H., Francksen H., Paul H. L. 1970; Protein subunits in the potato virus X group. Determination of the molecular weights by polyacrylamide electrophoresis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 207:184–189
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Niblett C. L., Paulsen A. Q., Toler R. W. 1977; Panicum mosaic virus. CMI/AAB Descriptions of Plant Viruses No. 177
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Paul H. L., Huth W. 1978; Grouping of some viruses of gramineae by means of serology and base composition of their RNAs. 3rd International Congress of Plant Pathology, Munchen August 1978, Abstracts p 13
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Paul H. L., Querfurth G. 1979; Differences in precipitin patterns produced in immunoelectrophoresis by plant viruses stored in different ways. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 94:234–240
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Scheidegger G. G. 1955; Une micro-methode de l’immuno-electrophorese. International Archives of Allergy 7:103–110
    [Google Scholar]
  11. van Regenmortel M. H. V., Von Wechmar M. B. 1970; A re-examination of the serological relationship between tobacco mosaic virus and cucumber virus 4. Virology 41:330–338
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-47-1-67
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-47-1-67
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error