1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Single administrations of poly C or poly I are anti-viral against infections of encephalomyocarditis (EMC) and Semliki Forest virus (SFV) in mice but poly U and poly A are not. The degree of protection is dose-dependent and mice which die do so at a later time than untreated controls even in a strain of mouse in which the time of death is not dependent on the dose of virus given. No circulating interferon is found after treating mice with poly C or poly I even at polynucleotide doses which give the same degree of protection as the interferon inducer, poly I:C. Several additional features distinguish the protection by poly C and poly I from interferon induction: the effect is low 24 h before infection and maximal 6 h before infection, the effect is short-lived and mice do not show hypo-reactivation to repeated treatment. Limited treatment of mice with poly I:C, interferon or poly C before infection itself results in additional protection when poly C is also administered after infection, indicating that poly C has an effect after onset of virus replication. After infection poly C and poly I are both more effective by the intravenous route but before infection they are most effective when administered by the same route as the virus. Quantitative comparisons of the protective effects of poly C, poly I and the interferon inducer, poly I:C, are possible from dose response curves of the polynucleotides at different times relative to infection and by different routes of administration. The results are considered in relation to the presence of homopolyribonucleotide tracts in the viral genomes and effects on the reticulo-endothelial system of the mice.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-30-1-21
1976-01-01
2021-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/30/1/JV0300010021.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-30-1-21&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baron S., Bogomolova N. N., Billiau A., Levy H. B., Buckler C. E., Stern R., Naylor R. 1969; Induction of interferon by preparations of synthetic single-stranded RNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 64:67–74
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Billiau A., Muyembe J. J., de Somer P. i971; Mechanism of anti-viral activity in vivo of polycarboxylates which induce interferon production. Nature New Biology 232:183–186
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Colby C. 1971; The induction of interferon by natural and synthetic polynucleotides. Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology 11:1–32
    [Google Scholar]
  4. De Clercq E., Merigan T. C. 1969; Requirement of a stable secondary structure for the anti-viral activity of polynucleotides. Nature, London 222:1148–1152
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Goodchild L., Fellner P., Porter A. G. 1975; The determination of secondary structure in the poly(C) tract of encephalomyocarditis virus RNA with sodium bisulphite. Nucleic Acids Research 2:887–895
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hirsch M. S., Zisman B., Allison A. C. 1970; Macrophages and age-dependent resistance to herpes simplex virus in mice. Journal of Immunology 104:1160–1165
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ho M. 1973; Factors influencing interferon production. In Interferons and Interferon Inducers pp. 73–105 Edited by Finter N. B. Amsterdam and London: North-Holland Publishing Company;
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Peto R., Pike M. C. 1973; Conservation of the approximation Σ(O–E)2/E in the logrank test for survival data or tumor incidence data. Biometrics 29:579–584
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Pitha P. M. 1973; Analogues of viral genomes. In Selective Inhibitors of Viral Functions pp. 394–360 Edited by Carter W. A. Ohio: CRC Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Porter A., Carey N., Fellner P. 1974; Presence of a large poly (rC) tract within the RNA of encephalomyocarditis virus. Nature, London 248:675–678
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rager-Zisman B., allison A. C. 1973; The role of antibody and host cells in the resistance of mice against infection by Coxsackie B-3 Virus. Journal of General Virology 19:329–338
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Salvin S. B., Youngner J. S., Lederer W. H. 1973; Migration inhibitory factor and interferon in the circulation of mice with delayed hypersensitivity. Infection and Immunity 7:68–75
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Teitelbaum H., Englander S. W. 1975; Open states in native polynucleotides. II. Hydrogen exchange study of cytosine-containing double helices. Journal of Molecular Biology 92:79–92
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Zisman B., Wheelock E. F., Allison A. C. 1971; Role of macrophages and antibody in resistance of mice against yellow fever virus. Journal of Immunology 107:236–243
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-30-1-21
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-30-1-21
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error