1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Potato aucuba mosaic virus and potato virus C were transmitted by the aphid , not only from plants also infected with a helper virus, but also from plants infected with them alone, provided the aphids fed first on plants infected with the helper virus. Several different viruses acted as helpers but all are in the potato virus Y group. Helper viruses differed in the efficiency with which they aided potato aucuba mosaic virus and potato virus C, and some potato aucuba mosaic virus isolates were transmitted more frequently than others. With potato virus Y as helper, up to 30% of the aphids transmitted potato aucuba mosaic virus. Aphids were usually fed for brief periods on plants infected with the helper virus but aphids fed for 2 days also transmitted potato aucuba mosaic virus readily. Starving the aphids for 1 to 2 hr between their acquisition feeds on plants infected with helper and aided virus decreased but did not eliminate transmission.

The helper virus need not be infective; potato aucuba mosaic virus and potato virus C were transmitted as frequently when transmission of the helper virus was prevented by exposing the source leaf to u.v. radiation as when it was not. Virus was not transmitted by aphids fed through artificial membranes on extracts of leaves infected with potato virus Y, potato aucuba mosaic virus or a mixture of the two. However, potato aucuba mosaic virus was transmitted from extracts by aphids fed through membranes when the aphids had previously fed on a potato virus Y-infected leaf. Similarly, potato virus Y was transmitted from leaf extracts by aphids fed through membranes when the aphids had previously fed on a potato virus Y-infected leaf that had been irradiated with u.v. to prevent transmission of potato virus Y from this source.

Possible mechanisms for the transmission of the helper and aided viruses are discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-13-2-221
1971-11-01
2021-10-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/13/2/JV0130020221.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-13-2-221&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Brunt A. A., Kenten R. H. 1971; Pepper veinal mottle virus. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1970: Part 1 p 124
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Govier D. A., Woods R. D. 1971; Changes induced by magnesium ions in the morphology of some plant viruses with filamentous particles. Journal of General Virology 13:127
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kassanis B. 1961; The transmission of potato aucuba mosaic virus by aphids from plants also infected by potato viruses A or Y. Virology 13:93
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kassanis B., Govier D. A. 1971; New evidence on the mechanism of aphid transmission of potato C and potato aucuba mosaic viruses. Journal of General Virology 10:99
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lovisolo L., Bartels R. 1970; On a new strain of henbane mosaic virus from Physalis alkekengi . Phyto- pathologische Zeitschrift 69:189
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Pirone T. P. 1969 In Viruses, Vectors and Vegetation p 204 Ed. by Maramorosch K. New York: Interscience Publishers;
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Pirone T. P., Megahed E. 1966; Aphid transmissibility of some purified viruses and viral RNAs. Virology 30631
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-13-2-221
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-13-2-221
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error