1887

Access Microbiology open research platform logo

Volume 5, Issue 4

Microbial communities in freshwater used for hydraulic fracturing are unable to withstand the high temperatures and pressures characteristic of fractured shales Open Access

Abstract

Natural gas is recovered from shale formations by hydraulic fracturing, a process known to create microbial ecosystems in the deep subsurface. Microbial communities that emerge in fractured shales include organisms known to degrade fracturing fluid additives and contribute to corrosion of well infrastructure. In order to limit these negative microbial processes, it is essential to constrain the source of the responsible micro-organisms. Previous studies have identified a number of potential sources, including fracturing fluids and drilling muds, yet these sources remain largely untested. Here, we apply high-pressure experimental approaches to assess whether the microbial community in synthetic fracturing fluid made from freshwater reservoir water can withstand the temperature and pressure conditions of hydraulic fracturing and the fractured shale environment. Using cell enumerations, DNA extraction and culturing, we show that the community can withstand high pressure or high temperature alone, but the combination of both is fatal. These results suggest that initial freshwater-based fracturing fluids are an unlikely source of micro-organisms in fractured shales. These findings indicate that potentially problematic lineages, such as sulfidogenic strains of that have been found to dominate fractured shale microbial communities, likely derive from other input sources into the downwell environment, such as drilling muds.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): fractured shale microbial communities , fracturing fluid additives , high pressure and hydraulic fracturing
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Natural Environment Research Council (Award NE/R013462/1)
    • Principle Award Recipient: SophieL Nixon
© 2023 The Authors
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000515.v3
2023-04-21
2024-05-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/acmi/5/4/acmi000515.v3.html?itemId=/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000515.v3&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Elsner M, Hoelzer K. Quantitative survey and structural classification of hydraulic fracturing chemicals reported in unconventional gas production. Environ Sci Technol 2016; 50:3290–3314 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Daly RA, Borton MA, Wilkins MJ, Hoyt DW, Kountz DJ et al. Microbial metabolisms in a 2.5-km-deep ecosystem created by hydraulic fracturing in shales. Nat Microbiol 2016; 1:16146 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Mouser PJ, Borton M, Darrah TH, Hartsock A, Wrighton KC. Hydraulic fracturing offers view of microbial life in the deep terrestrial subsurface. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2016; 92:1–18 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Booker AE, Borton MA, Daly RA, Welch SA, Nicora CD et al. Sulfide generation by dominant Halanaerobium microorganisms in hydraulically fractured shales. mSphere 2017; 2:e00257-17 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Evans MV, Getzinger G, Luek JL, Hanson AJ, McLaughlin MC et al. In situ transformation of ethoxylate and glycol surfactants by shale-colonizing microorganisms during hydraulic fracturing. ISME J 2019; 13:2690–2700 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Nixon SL, Walker L, Streets MDT, Eden B, Boothman C et al. Guar gum stimulates biogenic sulfide production at elevated pressures: implications for Shale gas extraction. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:679 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Lipus D, Vikram A, Ross D, Bain D, Gulliver D et al. Predominance and metabolic potential of Halanaerobium spp. in produced water from hydraulically fractured Marcellus shale wells. Appl Environ Microbiol 2017; 83:e02659-16 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Vikram A, Lipus D, Bibby K. Metatranscriptome analysis of active microbial communities in produced water samples from the Marcellus Shale. Microb Ecol 2016; 72:571–581 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Liang R, Davidova IA, Marks CR, Stamps BW, Harriman BH et al. Metabolic capability of a predominant Halanaerobium sp. in hydraulically fractured gas wells and its implication in pipeline corrosion. Front Microbiol 2016; 7:988 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cluff MA, Hartsock A, MacRae JD, Carter K, Mouser PJ. Temporal changes in microbial ecology and geochemistry in produced water from hydraulically fractured Marcellus shale gas wells. Environ Sci Technol 2014; 48:6508–6517 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Johnson K, French K, Fichter JK, Oden R. Use Of Microbiocides In Barnett Shale Gas Well Fracturing Fluids To Control Bacteria Related Problems. Corros New Orleans, Louisiana: NACE International; 2008
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Moore SL, Cripps CM. Bacterial survival in fractured shale-gas wells of the horn river basin. J Can Pet Technol 2012; 51:283–289 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Murali Mohan A, Hartsock A, Hammack RW, Vidic RD, Gregory KB. Microbial communities in flowback water impoundments from hydraulic fracturing for recovery of shale gas. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2013; 86:567–580 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Struchtemeyer CG, Elshahed MS. Bacterial communities associated with hydraulic fracturing fluids in thermogenic natural gas wells in North Central Texas, USA. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2012; 81:13–25 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Davis JP, Struchtemeyer CG, Elshahed MS. Bacterial communities associated with production facilities of two newly drilled thermogenic natural gas wells in the Barnett Shale (Texas, USA). Microb Ecol 2012; 64:942–954 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Lipus D, Roy D, Khan E, Ross D, Vikram A et al. Microbial communities in Bakken region produced water. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2018; 365: [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Murali Mohan A, Hartsock A, Bibby KJ, Hammack RW, Vidic RD et al. Microbial community changes in hydraulic fracturing fluids and produced water from shale gas extraction. Environ Sci Technol 2013; 47:13141–13150 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Strong LC, Gould T, Kasinkas L, Sadowsky MJ, Aksan A et al. Biodegradation in waters from hydraulic fracturing: chemistry, microbiology, and engineering. J Environ Eng 2014; 140: [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Wuchter C, Banning E, Mincer TJ, Drenzek NJ, Coolen MJL. Microbial diversity and methanogenic activity of Antrim Shale formation waters from recently fractured wells. Front Microbiol 2013; 4:367 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Struchtemeyer CG, Davis JP, Elshahed MS. Influence of the drilling mud formulation process on the bacterial communities in thermogenic natural gas wells of the Barnett Shale. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011; 77:4744–4753 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Murali Mohan A, Bibby KJ, Lipus D, Hammack RW, Gregory KB. The functional potential of microbial communities in hydraulic fracturing source water and produced water from natural gas extraction characterized by metagenomic sequencing. PLoS One 2014; 9:e107682 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kekacs D, Drollette BD, Brooker M, Plata DL, Mouser PJ. Aerobic biodegradation of organic compounds in hydraulic fracturing fluids. Biodegradation 2015; 26:271–287 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Mouser PJ, Liu S, Cluff MA, McHugh M, Lenhart JJ et al. Redox Conditions Alter Biodegradation Rates and Microbial Community Dynamics of Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid Organic Additives in Soil–Groundwater Microcosms. Environ Eng Sci 2016; 33:827–838 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Yayanos ABT-M in M Deep-sea piezophilic bacteria. In Marine Microbiology Academic Press; 2001 pp 615–637
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Nixon SL, van Dongen BE, Boothman C, Small JS, Lloyd JR. Additives in plasticised polyvinyl chloride fuel microbial nitrate reduction at high pH: implications for nuclear waste disposal. Front Environ Sci 2018; 6:97 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA Sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. eds Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1991 pp 115–175
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J 2012; 6:1621–1624 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108 Suppl 1:4516–4522 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013; 79:5112–5120 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 2019; 37:852–857 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ et al. DADA2: High resolution sample inference from amplicon data. Bioinformatics024034 2015 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Bokulich NA, Kaehler BD, Rideout JR, Dillon M, Bolyen E et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 2018; 6:90 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Pedregosa F, Grisel O, Weiss R, Passos A, Brucher M et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res 2011; 12:2825–2830
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41:D590–6 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Fichter J, Wunch K, Moore R, Summer E, Braman S et al. How Hot is Too Hot For Bacteria? A Technical Study Assessing Bacterial Establishment In Downhole Drilling, Fracturing And Stimulation Operations. Corros Utah: NACE International, Salt Lake City; 2012
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Yamamoto K. Food processing by high hydrostatic pressure. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2017; 81:672–679 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Kalchayanand N, Sikes A, Dunne CP, Ray B. Interaction of hydrostatic pressure, time and temperature of pressurization and pediocin AcH on inactivation of foodborne bacteria. J Food Prot 1998; 61:425–431 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Rodríguez López J, Grande MJ, Pérez-Pulido R, Galvez A, Lucas R. Impact of high-hydrostatic pressure treatments applied singly or in combination with moderate heat on the microbial load, antimicrobial resistance, and bacterial diversity of guacamole. Microorganisms 2020; 8:909 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Marietou A, Chastain R, Beulig F, Scoma A, Hazen TC et al. The effect of hydrostatic pressure on enrichments of hydrocarbon degrading microbes from the Gulf of Mexico following the deepwater horizon oil spill. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:808 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Damas MSF, Ferreira RL, Campanini EB, Soares GG, Campos LC et al. Whole genome sequencing of the multidrug-resistant Chryseobacterium indologenes isolated from a patient in Brazil. Front Med 2022; 9:931379 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Pornpukdeewattana S, Jindaprasert A, Massa S. Alicyclobacillus spoilage and control – a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2019; 60:108 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. López G, Díaz-Cárdenas C, David Alzate J, Gonzalez LN, Shapiro N et al. Description of Alicyclobacillus montanus sp. nov., a mixotrophic bacterium isolated from acidic hot springs. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1608–1615 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000515.v3
Loading
Microbial communities in freshwater used for hydraulic fracturing are unable to withstand the high temperatures and pressures characteristic of fractured shales
Access Microbiology 5, 000515.v3 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000515.v3
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000515.v3
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000515.v3
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

EXCEL

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error