1887

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of using the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) MinION long-read sequencer in reconstructing fully closed plasmid sequences from eight Enterobacteriaceae isolates of six different species with plasmid populations of varying complexity. Species represented were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens and Klebsiella oxytoca, with plasmid populations ranging from 1–11 plasmids with sizes of 2–330 kb. Isolates were sequenced using Illumina (short-read) and ONT’s MinION (long-read) platforms, and compared with fully resolved PacBio (long-read) sequence assemblies for the same isolates. We compared the performance of different assembly approaches including SPAdes, plasmidSPAdes, hybridSPAdes, Canu, Canu+Pilon (canuPilon) and npScarf in recovering the plasmid structures of these isolates by comparing with the gold-standard PacBio reference sequences. Overall, canuPilon provided consistently good quality assemblies both in terms of assembly statistics (N50, number of contigs) and assembly accuracy [presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)/indels with respect to the reference sequence]. For plasmid reconstruction, Canu recovered 70 % of the plasmids in complete contigs, and combining three assembly approaches (Canu or canuPilon, hybridSPAdes and plasmidSPAdes) resulted in a total 78 % recovery rate for all the plasmids. The analysis demonstrated the potential of using MinION sequencing technology to resolve important plasmid structures in Enterobacteriaceae species independent of and in conjunction with Illumina sequencing data. A consensus assembly derived from several assembly approaches could present significant benefit in accurately resolving the greatest number of plasmid structures.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000118
2017-06-09
2019-10-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/3/8/mgen000118.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000118&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Partridge SR. Resistance mechanisms in Enterobacteriaceae. Pathology 2015;47:276–284 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Conlan S, Thomas PJ, Deming C, Park M, Lau AF et al. Single-molecule sequencing to track plasmid diversity of hospital-associated carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Sci Transl Med 2014;6:254ra126 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Shintani M, Sanchez ZK, Kimbara K. Genomics of microbial plasmids: classification and identification based on replication and transfer systems and host taxonomy. Front Microbiol 2015;6: [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Sheppard AE, Stoesser N, Wilson DJ, Sebra R, Kasarskis A et al. Nested Russian doll-like genetic mobility drives rapid dissemination of the carbapenem resistance gene bla KPC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016;60:3767–3778 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mathers AJ, Stoesser N, Sheppard AE, Pankhurst L, Giess A et al. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae at a single institution: insights into endemicity from whole-genome sequencing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015;59:1656–1663 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Conlan S, Park M, Deming C, Thomas PJ, Young AC et al. Plasmid dynamics in KPC-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae during long-term patient colonization. MBio 2016;7:e00742-16 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang Y, Yang Q, Wang Z. The evolution of nanopore sequencing. Front Genet 2014;5:449 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Turton JF, Doumith M, Hopkins KL, Perry C, Meunier D et al. Clonal expansion of Escherichia coli ST38 carrying a chromosomally integrated OXA-48 carbapenemase gene. J Med Microbiol 2016;65:538–546 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Judge K, Harris SR, Reuter S, Parkhill J, Peacock SJ. Early insights into the potential of the Oxford Nanopore MinION for the detection of antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 2015;70:2775–2778 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Judge K, Hunt M, Reuter S, Tracey A, Quail MA et al. Comparison of bacterial genome assembly software for MinION data and their applicability to medical microbiology. Microb Genom 2016;2:e000085 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Loman NJ, Quick J, Simpson JT. A complete bacterial genome assembled de novo using only nanopore sequencing data. Nat Methods 2015;12:733–735 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Risse J, Thomson M, Patrick S, Blakely G, Koutsovoulos G et al. A single chromosome assembly of Bacteroides fragilis strain BE1 from Illumina and MinION nanopore sequencing data. Gigascience 2015;4:1–7 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ashton PM, Nair S, Dallman T, Rubino S, Rabsch W et al. MinION nanopore sequencing identifies the position and structure of a bacterial antibiotic resistance island. Nat Biotechnol 2015;33:296–300 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Deschamps S, Mudge J, Cameron C, Ramaraj T, Anand A et al. Characterization, correction and de novo assembly of an Oxford Nanopore genomic dataset from Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Sci Rep 2016;6:28625 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012;19:455–477 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Cao MD, Nguyen SH, Ganesamoorthy D, Elliott AG, Cooper MA et al. Scaffolding and completing genome assemblies in real-time with nanopore sequencing. Nat Commun 2017;8:14515 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 2017;27:722–736 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 2014;9:e112963 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Sović I, Križanović K, Skala K, Šikić M. Evaluation of hybrid and non-hybrid methods for de novo assembly of nanopore reads. Bioinformatics 2016;32:2582–2589 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Stoesser N, Sheppard AE, Pankhurst L, De Maio N, Moore CE et al. Evolutionary history of the global emergence of the Escherichia coli epidemic clone ST131. MBio 2016;7:e02162-15 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Cuzon G, Naas T, Nordmann P. Functional characterization of Tn4401, a Tn3-based transposon involved in bla KPC gene mobilization. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55:5370–5373 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Antipov D, Hartwick N, Shen M, Raiko M, Lapidus A et al. plasmidSPAdes: assembling plasmids from whole genome sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2016;32:3380–3387 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Loman NJ, Quinlan AR. Poretools: a toolkit for analyzing nanopore sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014;30:3399–3401 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M et al. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol 2004;5:R12 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Urban JM, Bliss J, Lawrence CE, Gerbi SA. Sequencing ultra-long DNA molecules with the Oxford Nanopore MinION. bioRxiv 2015
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Eckert SE, Chan JZ-M, Houniet D, the PATHSEEK consortium Breuer J. Enrichment by hybridisation of long DNA fragments for Nanopore sequencing. Microb Genom 2016;2:1–10 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000118
Loading
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000118
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error