- Volume 168, Issue 5, 2022
Volume 168, Issue 5, 2022
- Reviews
-
-
-
The Legionella pneumophila Dot/Icm type IV secretion system and its effectors
More LessTo prevail in the interaction with eukaryotic hosts, many bacterial pathogens use protein secretion systems to release virulence factors at the host–pathogen interface and/or deliver them directly into host cells. An outstanding example of the complexity and sophistication of secretion systems and the diversity of their protein substrates, effectors, is the Defective in organelle trafficking/Intracellular multiplication (Dot/Icm) Type IVB secretion system (T4BSS) of Legionella pneumophila and related species. Legionella species are facultative intracellular pathogens of environmental protozoa and opportunistic human respiratory pathogens. The Dot/Icm T4BSS translocates an exceptionally large number of effectors, more than 300 per L. pneumophila strain, and is essential for evasion of phagolysosomal degradation and exploitation of protozoa and human macrophages as replicative niches. Recent technological advancements in the imaging of large protein complexes have provided new insight into the architecture of the T4BSS and allowed us to propose models for the transport mechanism. At the same time, significant progress has been made in assigning functions to about a third of L. pneumophila effectors, discovering unprecedented new enzymatic activities and concepts of host subversion. In this review, we describe the current knowledge of the workings of the Dot/Icm T4BSS machinery and provide an overview of the activities and functions of the to-date characterized effectors in the interaction of L. pneumophila with host cells.
-
-
-
-
Approaching the domesticated plant holobiont from a community evolution perspective
More LessPlants establish a pivotal relationship with their microbiome and are often conceptualized as holobionts. Nonetheless, holobiont theories have attracted much criticism, especially concerning the fact that the holobiont is rarely a unit of selection. In previous work, we discussed how the plant microbiome can be considered to be an ‘ecosystem on a leash’, which is subject to the influence of natural selection acting on plant traits. We proposed that in domesticated plants the assembly of the plant microbiome can usefully be conceptualized as being subject to a ‘double leash’, which encompasses both the effect of artificial selection imposed by the domesticator on plant traits and the leash from the plant to the microbiome. Here we approach the domesticated plant holobiont, simply defined as a community of organisms, from a community evolution point of view, and show how community heritability (a measure of community selection) complements the ‘double-leash’ framework in providing a community-level view of plant domestication and its impact on plant–microbe interactions. We also propose simple experiments that could be performed to investigate whether plant domestication has altered the potential for community selection at the holobiont level.
-
-
-
Bacterial protein secretion systems: Game of types
More LessProtein trafficking across the bacterial envelope is a process that contributes to the organisation and integrity of the cell. It is the foundation for establishing contact and exchange between the environment and the cytosol. It helps cells to communicate with one another, whether they establish symbiotic or competitive behaviours. It is instrumental for pathogenesis and for bacteria to subvert the host immune response. Understanding the formation of envelope conduits and the manifold strategies employed for moving macromolecules across these channels is a fascinating playground. The diversity of the nanomachines involved in this process logically resulted in an attempt to classify them, which is where the protein secretion system types emerged. As our knowledge grew, so did the number of types, and their rightful nomenclature started to be questioned. While this may seem a semantic or philosophical issue, it also reflects scientific rigour when it comes to assimilating findings into textbooks and science history. Here I give an overview on bacterial protein secretion systems, their history, their nomenclature and why it can be misleading for newcomers in the field. Note that I do not try to suggest a new nomenclature. Instead, I explore the reasons why naming could have escaped our control and I try to reiterate basic concepts that underlie protein trafficking cross membranes.
-
- Microbial Cell Surfaces
-
-
-
The lipoprotein DolP affects cell separation in Escherichia coli, but not as an upstream regulator of NlpD
Bacterial amidases are essential to split the shared envelope of adjunct daughter cells to allow cell separation. Their activity needs to be precisely controlled to prevent cell lysis. In Escherichia coli, amidase activity is controlled by three regulatory proteins NlpD, EnvC and ActS. However, recent studies linked the outer membrane lipoprotein DolP (formerly YraP) as a potential upstream regulator of NlpD. In this study we explored this link in further detail. To our surprise DolP did not modulate amidase activity in vitro and was unable to interact with NlpD in pull-down and MST (MicroScale Thermophoresis) assays. Next, we excluded the hypothesis that ΔdolP phenocopied ΔnlpD in a range of envelope stresses. However, morphological analysis of double deletion mutants of amidases (AmiA, AmiB AmiC) and amidase regulators with dolP revealed that ΔamiAΔdolP and ΔenvCΔdolP mutants display longer chain length compared to their parental strains indicating a role for DolP in cell division. Overall, we present evidence that DolP does not affect NlpD function in vitro, implying that DolP is not an upstream regulator of NlpD. However, DolP may impact daughter cell separation by interacting directly with AmiA or AmiC, or by a yet undiscovered mechanism.
-
-
- Microbial Evolution
-
-
-
The role of sigma factor competition in bacterial adaptation under prolonged starvation
More LessThe study of adaptive microbial evolution in the laboratory can illuminate the genetic mechanisms of gaining fitness under a pre-defined set of selection factors. Laboratory evolution of bacteria under long-term starvation has gained importance in recent years because of its ability to uncover adaptive strategies that overcome prolonged nutrient limitation, a condition often encountered by natural microbes. In this evolutionary paradigm, bacteria are maintained in an energy-restricted environment in a growth phase called long-term stationary phase (LTSP). This phase is characterized by a stable, viable population size and highly dynamic genetic changes. Multiple independent iterations of LTSP evolution experiments have given rise to mutants that are slow-growing compared to the ancestor. Although the antagonistic regulation between rapid growth and the stress response is well-known in bacteria (especially Escherichia coli ), the growth deficit of many LTSP-adapted mutants has not been explored in detail. In this review, I pinpoint the trade-off between growth and stress response as a dominant driver of evolutionary strategies under prolonged starvation. Focusing on mainly E. coli -based research, I discuss the various affectors and regulators of the competition between sigma factors to occupy their targets on the genome, and assess its effect on growth advantage in stationary phase (GASP). Finally, I comment on some crucial issues that hinder the progress of the field, including identification of novel metabolites in nutrient-depleted media, and the importance of using multidisciplinary research to resolve them.
-
-
- Microbial Physiology, Biochemistry and Metabolism (formerly Physiology and Metabolism)
-
-
-
The respiratory lipoquinone, menaquinone, functions as an inducer of genes regulated by the Mycobacterium smegmatis repressor MSMEG_2295
More LessA previous study reported that the Mycobacterium smegmatis (Msm) protein MSMEG_2295 is a repressor controlling the expression of several genes, including that for MSMEG_5125, a putative isoprenoid binding protein belonging to the YceI family, and DinB2, a DNA damage repair enzyme. This repressor is encoded by the first gene of the operon that also expresses the gene for DinB2. Targeted inhibition of MSMEG_5125 using CRISPRi technology resulted in a significant loss of Msm’s respiratory activity and viability. Since this protein has been predicted to be an isoprenoid binding protein, we suspected a role of menaquinones, which are isoprenoid naphthoquinones, in the observed phenomenon. Accordingly, we tested whether MSMEG_5125’s deficiency-induced lethality could be reversed by adding menaquinone. The result was positive, implying cooperation between MSMEG_5125 and menaquinone in bringing about respiration. Inhibition of MSMEG_5125 expression led to the induction of MSMEG_0089 and 2296, two hallmark genes of the MSMEG_2295 regulon. This result suggests that when MSMEG_5125 becomes limiting, a feedback-loop derepresses the MSMEG_2295 regulon genes, including its own. Interestingly, menaquinone functioned as an inducer of MSMEG_5125, indicating that it is likely to mediate the feedback mechanism. This result also strengthens our hypothesis that the functions of menaquinone and MSMEG_5125 are interrelated. Menaquinone also induced the MSMEG_2295-controlled operon MSMEG_2295–2294 (dinB2) not induced following the inactivation of MSMEG_5125. Therefore, the activation mechanism of MSMEG_2295-regulated genes may not be the same for all, although derepression is likely to be a common feature. In vitro, menaquinone abolished MSMEG_2295’s DNA binding activity by interacting with it, confirming its role as an inducer. Therefore, a menaquinone–MSMEG_5125-regulated gene expression circuit controls Msm respiration and possibly oxidative stress-induced DNA damage repair.
-
-
- Microbial Virulence and Pathogenesis
-
-
-
Validation of a random Vibrio parahaemolyticus genomic library by selection of quinolone resistance in a heterologous host
More LessVibrio parahaemolyticus is a shellfish-borne pathogen that is a highly prevalent causative agent of inflammatory gastroenteritis in humans. Genomic libraries have proven useful for the identification of novel gene functions in many bacterial species. In this study we prepared a library containing 40 kb fragments of randomly sheared V. parahaemolyticus genomic DNA and introduced this into Escherichia coli HB101 using a commercially available low copy cosmid system. In order to estimate coverage and suitability of the library and potentially identify novel antimicrobial resistance determinants, we screened for the acquisition of resistance to the fluoroquinolone norfloxacin – a phenotype exhibited by V. parahaemolyticus but not the heterologous E. coli host. Upon selection on solid medium containing norfloxacin, 0.52% of the library population was resistant, consistent with the selection of a single resistance locus. End-sequencing identified six distinct insert fragments. All clones displayed fourfold increased norfloxacin MIC compared with E. coli HB101 carrying an empty vector. The common locus contained within resistant clones included qnr, a previously described quinolone resistance gene. These results indicate that the library was unbiased, of sufficient coverage and that heterologous expression was possible. While we hope that this library proves useful for identifying the genetic determinants of complex phenotypes such as those related to virulence, not all norfloxacin resistance genes were detected in our screen. As such, we discuss the benefits and limitations of this approach for identifying the genetic basis of uncharacterized bacterial phenotypes.
-
-
-
-
The serotype a-EmaA adhesin of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans does not require O-PS synthesis for collagen binding activity
More LessAggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans , a causative agent of periodontitis and non-oral diseases, synthesizes a trimeric extracellular matrix protein adhesin A (EmaA) that mediates collagen binding and biofilm formation. EmaA is found as two molecular forms, which correlate with the serotype of the bacterium. The canonical protein (b-EmaA), associated with serotypes b and c, has a monomeric molecular mass of 202 kDa. The collagen binding activity of b-EmaA is dependent on the presence of O-polysaccharide (O-PS), whereas biofilm activity is independent of O-PS synthesis. The EmaA associated with serotype a strains (a-EmaA) has a monomeric molecular mass of 173 kDa and differs in the amino acid sequence of the functional domain of the protein. In this study, a-emaA was confirmed to encode a protein that forms antenna-like appendages on the surface of the bacterium, which were found to be important for both collagen binding and biofilm formation. In an O-PS-deficient talose biosynthetic (tld) mutant strain, the electrophoretic mobility of the a-EmaA monomers was altered and the amount of membrane-associated EmaA was decreased when compared to the parent strain. The mass of biofilm formed remained unchanged. Interestingly, the collagen binding activity of the mutant strain was similar to the activity associated with the parent strain, which differs from that observed with the canonical b-EmaA isoform. These data suggest that the properties of the a-EmaA isoform are like those of b-EmaA, with the exception that collagen binding activity is independent of the presence or absence of the O-PS.
-
Volumes and issues
-
Volume 170 (2024)
-
Volume 169 (2023)
-
Volume 168 (2022)
-
Volume 167 (2021)
-
Volume 166 (2020)
-
Volume 165 (2019)
-
Volume 164 (2018)
-
Volume 163 (2017)
-
Volume 162 (2016)
-
Volume 161 (2015)
-
Volume 160 (2014)
-
Volume 159 (2013)
-
Volume 158 (2012)
-
Volume 157 (2011)
-
Volume 156 (2010)
-
Volume 155 (2009)
-
Volume 154 (2008)
-
Volume 153 (2007)
-
Volume 152 (2006)
-
Volume 151 (2005)
-
Volume 150 (2004)
-
Volume 149 (2003)
-
Volume 148 (2002)
-
Volume 147 (2001)
-
Volume 146 (2000)
-
Volume 145 (1999)
-
Volume 144 (1998)
-
Volume 143 (1997)
-
Volume 142 (1996)
-
Volume 141 (1995)
-
Volume 140 (1994)
-
Volume 139 (1993)
-
Volume 138 (1992)
-
Volume 137 (1991)
-
Volume 136 (1990)
-
Volume 135 (1989)
-
Volume 134 (1988)
-
Volume 133 (1987)
-
Volume 132 (1986)
-
Volume 131 (1985)
-
Volume 130 (1984)
-
Volume 129 (1983)
-
Volume 128 (1982)
-
Volume 127 (1981)
-
Volume 126 (1981)
-
Volume 125 (1981)
-
Volume 124 (1981)
-
Volume 123 (1981)
-
Volume 122 (1981)
-
Volume 121 (1980)
-
Volume 120 (1980)
-
Volume 119 (1980)
-
Volume 118 (1980)
-
Volume 117 (1980)
-
Volume 116 (1980)
-
Volume 115 (1979)
-
Volume 114 (1979)
-
Volume 113 (1979)
-
Volume 112 (1979)
-
Volume 111 (1979)
-
Volume 110 (1979)
-
Volume 109 (1978)
-
Volume 108 (1978)
-
Volume 107 (1978)
-
Volume 106 (1978)
-
Volume 105 (1978)
-
Volume 104 (1978)
-
Volume 103 (1977)
-
Volume 102 (1977)
-
Volume 101 (1977)
-
Volume 100 (1977)
-
Volume 99 (1977)
-
Volume 98 (1977)
-
Volume 97 (1976)
-
Volume 96 (1976)
-
Volume 95 (1976)
-
Volume 94 (1976)
-
Volume 93 (1976)
-
Volume 92 (1976)
-
Volume 91 (1975)
-
Volume 90 (1975)
-
Volume 89 (1975)
-
Volume 88 (1975)
-
Volume 87 (1975)
-
Volume 86 (1975)
-
Volume 85 (1974)
-
Volume 84 (1974)
-
Volume 83 (1974)
-
Volume 82 (1974)
-
Volume 81 (1974)
-
Volume 80 (1974)
-
Volume 79 (1973)
-
Volume 78 (1973)
-
Volume 77 (1973)
-
Volume 76 (1973)
-
Volume 75 (1973)
-
Volume 74 (1973)
-
Volume 73 (1972)
-
Volume 72 (1972)
-
Volume 71 (1972)
-
Volume 70 (1972)
-
Volume 69 (1971)
-
Volume 68 (1971)
-
Volume 67 (1971)
-
Volume 66 (1971)
-
Volume 65 (1971)
-
Volume 64 (1970)
-
Volume 63 (1970)
-
Volume 62 (1970)
-
Volume 61 (1970)
-
Volume 60 (1970)
-
Volume 59 (1969)
-
Volume 58 (1969)
-
Volume 57 (1969)
-
Volume 56 (1969)
-
Volume 55 (1969)
-
Volume 54 (1968)
-
Volume 53 (1968)
-
Volume 52 (1968)
-
Volume 51 (1968)
-
Volume 50 (1968)
-
Volume 49 (1967)
-
Volume 48 (1967)
-
Volume 47 (1967)
-
Volume 46 (1967)
-
Volume 45 (1966)
-
Volume 44 (1966)
-
Volume 43 (1966)
-
Volume 42 (1966)
-
Volume 41 (1965)
-
Volume 40 (1965)
-
Volume 39 (1965)
-
Volume 38 (1965)
-
Volume 37 (1964)
-
Volume 36 (1964)
-
Volume 35 (1964)
-
Volume 34 (1964)
-
Volume 33 (1963)
-
Volume 32 (1963)
-
Volume 31 (1963)
-
Volume 30 (1963)
-
Volume 29 (1962)
-
Volume 28 (1962)
-
Volume 27 (1962)
-
Volume 26 (1961)
-
Volume 25 (1961)
-
Volume 24 (1961)
-
Volume 23 (1960)
-
Volume 22 (1960)
-
Volume 21 (1959)
-
Volume 20 (1959)
-
Volume 19 (1958)
-
Volume 18 (1958)
-
Volume 17 (1957)
-
Volume 16 (1957)
-
Volume 15 (1956)
-
Volume 14 (1956)
-
Volume 13 (1955)
-
Volume 12 (1955)
-
Volume 11 (1954)
-
Volume 10 (1954)
-
Volume 9 (1953)
-
Volume 8 (1953)
-
Volume 7 (1952)
-
Volume 6 (1952)
-
Volume 5 (1951)
-
Volume 4 (1950)
-
Volume 3 (1949)
-
Volume 2 (1948)
-
Volume 1 (1947)