- Volume 152, Issue 5, 2006

Phospholipase A (PLA) is one of the few enzymes present in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, and is likely to be involved in the membrane disruption processes that occur during host cell invasion. Both secreted and membrane-bound phospholipase A2 activities have been described in bacteria, fungi and protozoa. Recently there have been increasing reports on the involvement of PLA in bacterial invasion and pathogenesis. This review highlights the latest findings on PLA as a virulence factor in Gram-negative bacteria.

RasG-regulated signal transduction has been linked to a variety of growth-specific processes and appears to also play a role in the early development of Dictyostelium discoideum. In an attempt to uncover some of the molecular components involved in Ras-mediated signalling, several proteins have been described previously, including the cell adhesion molecule DdCAD-1, whose phosphorylation state was affected by the expression of the constitutively activated RasG, RasG(G12T). Here it has been shown that a cadA null strain lacks the phosphoproteins that were tentatively identified as DdCAD-1, confirming its previous designation. Further investigation revealed that cells expressing RasG(G12T) exhibited increased cell–cell cohesion, concomitant with reduced levels of DdCAD-1 phosphorylation. This increased cohesion was DdCAD-1-dependent and was correlated with increased localization of DdCAD-1 at the cell surface. DdCAD-1 phosphorylation was also found to decrease during Dictyostelium aggregation. These results revealed a possible role for protein phosphorylation in regulating DdCAD-1-mediated cell adhesion during early development. In addition, the levels of DdCAD-1 protein were substantially reduced in a rasG null cell line. These results indicate that RasG affects both the expression and dephosphorylation of DdCAD-1 during early development.

The mechanism by which soluble proteins, such as carboxypeptidase Y, reach the vacuole in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is very similar to the mechanism of lysosomal protein sorting in mammalian cells. Vps10p is a receptor for transport of soluble vacuolar proteins in S. cerevisiae. vps10 +, a gene encoding a homologue of S. cerevisiae PEP1/VPS10, has been identified and deleted from the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Deletion of the vps10 + gene resulted in missorting and secretion of Sch. pombe vacuolar carboxypeptidase Cpy1p, indicating that it is required for targeting Cpy1p to the vacuole. Sch. pombe Vps10p (SpVps10p) is a type I transmembrane protein and its C-terminal cytoplasmic tail domain is essential for Cpy1p transport to the vacuole. Cells expressing green fluorescent protein-tagged SpVps10p produced a punctate pattern of fluorescence, indicating that SpVps10p was largely localized in the Golgi compartment. In addition, Sch. pombe vps26 +, vps29 + and vps35 +, encoding homologues of the S. cerevisiae retromer components VPS26, VPS29 and VPS35, were identified and deleted. Fluorescence microscopy demonstrated that SpVps10p mislocalized to the vacuolar membrane in these mutants. These results indicate that the vps26 +, vps29 + and vps35 + gene products are required for retrograde transport of SpVps10p from the prevacuolar compartment back to the Golgi in Sch. pombe cells.

Type I signal peptidases (SPases) are responsible for the cleavage of signal peptides from secretory proteins. Streptomyces lividans contains four different SPases, denoted SipW, SipX, SipY and SipZ, having at least some differences in their substrate specificity. In this report in vitro preprotein binding/processing and protein secretion in single SPase mutants was determined to gain more insight into the substrate specificity of the different SPases and the underlying molecular basis. Results indicated that preproteins do not preferentially bind to a particular SPase, suggesting SPase competition for binding preproteins. This observation, together with the fact that each SPase could process each preprotein tested with a similar efficiency in an in vitro assay, suggested that there is no real specificity in substrate binding and processing, and that they are all actively involved in preprotein processing in vivo. Although this seems to be the case for some proteins tested, high-level secretion of others was clearly dependent on only one particular SPase demonstrating clear differences in substrate preference at the in vivo processing level. Hence, these results strongly suggest that there are additional factors other than the cleavage requirements of the enzymes that strongly affect the substrate preference of SPases in vivo.

Regulation of methionine biosynthesis in Escherichia coli involves a complex of the MetJ aporepressor protein and S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) repressing expression of most genes in the met regulon. To test the role of SAM in the regulation of met genes directly, SAM pools were depleted by the in vivo expression of the cloned plasmid vector-based coliphage T3 SAM hydrolase (SAMase) gene. Cultures with in vivo SAMase activity were assayed for expression of the metA, B, C, E, F, H, J, K and R genes in cells grown in methionine-rich complete media as well as in defined media with and without l-methionine. In vivo SAMase activity dramatically induced expression between 11- and nearly 1000-fold depending on the gene assayed for all but metJ and metH, and these genes were induced over twofold. metJ : : Tn5 (aporepressor defective) and metK : : Tn5 (SAM synthetase impaired; produces <5 % of wild-type SAM) strains containing in vivo SAMase activity produced even higher met gene activity than that seen in comparably prepared cells with wild-type genes for all but metJ in a MetJ-deficient background. The SAMase-mediated hyperinduction of metH in wild-type cells and of the met genes assayed in metJ : : Tn5 and metK : : Tn5 cells provokes questions about how other elements such as the MetR activator protein or factors beyond the met regulon itself might be involved in the regulation of genes responsible for methionine biosynthesis.

The nitrite reductase and nitric oxide reductase regulator (NNR) from Paracoccus denitrificans activates transcription in response to nitric oxide (NO). The mechanism of NO sensing has not been elucidated for NNR, or for any of its orthologues from the FNR/CRP family of transcriptional regulators. Using regulated expression of the nnr gene in Escherichia coli, evidence has now been obtained to indicate that activation of NNR by NO does not require de novo synthesis of the NNR polypeptide. In anaerobic cultures, NNR is inactivated slowly following removal of the source of NO. In contrast, exposure of anaerobically grown cultures to oxygen causes rapid inactivation of NNR, suggesting that the protein is inactivated directly by oxygen. By random and site-directed mutagenesis, two variants of NNR were isolated (with substitutions of arginine at position 80) that show high levels of activity in anaerobic cultures in the absence of NO. These proteins remain substantially inactive in aerobic cultures, suggesting that the substitutions uncouple the NO- and oxygen-signalling mechanisms, thus providing further evidence that NNR senses both molecules. Structural modelling suggested that Arg-80 is close to the C-helix that forms the monomer–monomer interface in other members of the FNR/CRP family and plays an important role in transducing the activating signal between the regulatory and DNA binding domains. Assays of NNR activity in a haem-deficient mutant of E. coli provided preliminary evidence to indicate that NNR activity is haem dependent.

Plasmids are the tools of choice for studying bacterial functions involved in DNA maintenance. Here a genetic study on the replication of a novel, low-copy-number, Bacillus subtilis plasmid, pBS72, is reported. The results show that two plasmid elements, the initiator protein RepA and an iteron-containing origin, and at least nine host-encoded replication proteins, the primosomal proteins DnaB, DnaC, DnaD, DnaG and DnaI, the DNA polymerases DnaE and PolC, and the polymerase cofactors DnaN and DnaX, are required for pBS72 replication. On the contrary, the cellular initiators DnaA and PriA, the helicase PcrA and DNA polymerase I are dispensable. From this, it is inferred that pBS72 replication is of the theta type and is initiated by an original mechanism. Indirect evidence suggests that during this process the DnaC helicase might be delivered to the plasmid origin by the weakly active DnaD pathway stimulated by a predicted interaction between DnaC and a domain of RepA homologous to the major DnaC-binding domain of the cellular initiator DnaA. The plasmid pBS72 replication fork appears to require the same functions as the bacterial chromosome and the unrelated plasmid pAMβ1. Most importantly, this replication machinery contains the two type C polymerases, PolC and DnaE. As the mechanism of initiation of the three genomes is substantially different, this suggests that both type C polymerases might be required in any Cairns replication in B. subtilis and presumably in other bacteria encoding PolC and DnaE.

The role of cytochrome c 2, encoded by cycA, and cytochrome c Y, encoded by cycY, in electron transfer to the nitrite reductase of Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.3 was investigated using both in vivo and in vitro approaches. Both cycA and cycY were isolated, sequenced and insertionally inactivated in strain 2.4.3. Deletion of either gene alone had no apparent effect on the ability of R. sphaeroides to reduce nitrite. In a cycA–cycY double mutant, nitrite reduction was largely inhibited. However, the expression of the nitrite reductase gene nirK from a heterologous promoter substantially restored nitrite reductase activity in the double mutant. Using purified protein, a turnover number of 5 s−1 was observed for the oxidation of cytochrome c 2 by nitrite reductase. In contrast, oxidation of c Y only resulted in a turnover of ∼0·1 s−1. The turnover experiments indicate that c 2 is a major electron donor to nitrite reductase but c Y is probably not. Taken together, these results suggest that there is likely an unidentified electron donor, in addition to c 2, that transfers electrons to nitrite reductase, and that the decreased nitrite reductase activity observed in the cycA–cycY double mutant probably results from a change in nirK expression.

Nisin Z, a post-translationally modified antimicrobial peptide of Lactococcus lactis, is positively autoregulated by extracellular nisin via the two-component regulatory proteins NisRK. A mutation in the nisin NisT transporter rendered L. lactis incapable of nisin secretion, and nisin accumulated inside the cells. Normally nisin is activated after secretion by the serine protease NisP in the cell wall. This study showed that when secretion of nisin was blocked, intracellular proteolytic activity could cleave the N-terminal leader peptide of nisin precursor, resulting in active nisin. The isolated cytoplasm of a non-nisin producer could also cleave the leader from the nisin precursor, showing that the cytoplasm of L. lactis cells does contain proteolytic activity capable of cleaving the leader from fully modified nisin precursor. Nisin could not be detected in the growth supernatant of the NisT mutant strain with a nisin-sensing strain (sensitivity 10 pg ml−1), which has a green fluorescent protein gene connected to the nisin-inducible nisA promoter and a functional nisin signal transduction circuit. Northern analysis of the NisT mutant cells revealed that even though the cells could not secrete nisin, the nisin-inducible promoter P nisZ was active. In a nisB or nisC background, where nisin could not be fully modified due to the mutations in the nisin modification machinery, the unmodified or partly modified nisin precursor accumulated in the cytoplasm. This immature nisin could not induce the P nisZ promoter. The results suggest that when active nisin is accumulated in the cytoplasm, it can insert into the membrane and from there extrude parts of the molecule into the pseudoperiplasmic space to interact with the signal-recognition domain of the histidine kinase NisK. Potentially, signal presentation via the membrane represents a general pathway for amphiphilic signals to interact with their sensors for signal transduction.

The molecular basis of the broad substrate recognition and the transport of substrates by Cdr1p, a major drug efflux protein of Candida albicans, is not well understood. To investigate the role of transmembrane domains and nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs) of Cdr1p in drug transport, two sets of protein chimeras were constructed: one set between homologous regions of Cdr1p and the non-drug transporter Cdr3p, and another set consisting of Cdr1p variants comprising either two N- or two C-terminal NBDs of Cdr1p. The replacement of either the N- or the C-terminal half of Cdr1p by the homologous segments of Cdr3p resulted in non-functional recombinant strains expressing chimeric proteins. The results suggest that the chimeric protein could not reach the plasma membrane, probably because of misfolding and subsequent cellular trafficking problems, or the rapid degradation of the chimeras. As an exception, the replacement of transmembrane segment 12 (TMS12) of Cdr1p by the corresponding region of Cdr3p resulted in a functional chimera which displayed unaltered affinity for all the tested substrates. The variant protein comprising either two N-terminal or two C-terminal NBDs of Cdr1p also resulted in non-functional recombinant strains. However, the N-terminal NBD variant, which also showed poor cell surface localization, could be rescued to cell surface, if cells were grown in the presence of drug substrates. The rescued chimera remained non-functional, as was evident from impaired ATPase and efflux activities. Taken together, the results suggest that the two NBDs of Cdr1p are asymmetric and non-exchangeable and that the drug efflux by Cdr1p involves complex interactions between the two halves of the protein.

Candida guilliermondii is a haploid opportunistic pathogen accounting for about 2 % of human blood yeast infections. Recent analyses using multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and karyotyping suggest that strains from human sources traditionally designated C. guilliermondii in fact include at least two species, C. guilliermondii and Candida fermentati. However, the patterns of molecular variation within and between these two species remain largely unknown. In this study, DNA fragments were sequenced from five genes for each of 37 strains collected from Canada, China, the Philippines and Tanzania. The analyses identified significant sequence differences between C. guilliermondii and C. fermentati. The five gene genealogies showed no apparent incongruence, suggesting a predominantly clonal reproductive structure for both species in nature. Indeed, two large clones of C. guilliermondii were identified, with one from Ontario, Canada, and the other from China. Interestingly, the results indicate that strains currently designated C. guilliermondii may contain additional divergent lineages. On the practical side, the results revealed several diagnostic molecular markers that can be used in clinical microbiology laboratories to distinguish C. guilliermondii and C. fermentati. The multiple gene genealogical analyses conducted here revealed significant divergence and clonal dispersal in this important pathogenic yeast complex.

The long-chain acyl-CoA synthase (ACS) FadD1 plays an important role in timing the levels of antibiotic production in Streptomyces coelicolor. fadD1 and macs1, encoding a putative medium-chain ACS, are part of a two-gene operon, whose expression is induced during the stationary phase of growth. Here it is reported that transcription of the macs1-fadD1 operon is positively regulated by AcsR, a LuxR-type transcriptional regulator. In an acsR mutant, expression of the macs1-fadD1 genes loses its normal up-regulation and the mutant becomes deficient in antibiotic production, in a clear correlation with the phenotype shown by a fadD1 null mutant. The absence of macs1-fadD1 induction in the acsR mutant was restored by complementation with a wild-type copy of the acsR gene, showing a strict link between AcsR and induction of the macs1-fadD1 operon. Gel mobility shift assays and DNase I footprinting indicated that AcsR binds to specific sequences about +162 nucleotides downstream of the macs1 transcriptional start site. In the putative operator sequence three almost identical direct tandem repeats of seven nucleotides were identified where the central sequence is essential for AcsR recognition and binding. Transcriptional fusions of the divergent pacsR and pmacs1 promoters indicated that AcsR does not regulate its own transcription, and that it binds to the operator region to control exclusively the growth-phase induction of the macs1-fadD1 operon.