Chlamydia trachomatis L2 was used to infect BGMK cells at an m.o.i. of 1.0, and the developmental cycle was followed by transmission electron microscopy and quantitative PCR (QPCR) for both chromosomal and plasmid DNA. Samples were taken at sequential 6 h time points. Subsequent analysis by QPCR showed that there was an initial slow replication period (0–18 h), followed by a rapid phase (18–36 h) coinciding with exponential division when the DNA doubling time was 4.6 h. Chromosomal DNA was amplified 100–200-fold corresponding to 7–8 generations for the complete developmental cycle. Penicillin (10 and 100 units ml−1) was added to cultures at 20 h post-infection (p.i.). This blocked binary fission and also prevented reticulate body (RB) to elementary body transition. However, exposure to penicillin did not prevent chromosomal or plasmid DNA replication. After a short lag period, following the addition of penicillin, chlamydial chromosomal DNA replication resumed at the same rate as in control C. trachomatis-infected cells. C. trachomatis-infected host cells exposed to penicillin did not lyse, but instead harboured large, aberrant RBs in massive inclusions that completely filled the cell cytoplasm. In these RBs, the DNA continued to replicate well beyond the end of the normal developmental cycle. At 60 h p.i. each aberrant RB contained a minimum of 16 chromosomal copies.
BeattyW. L, MorrisonR. P, ByrneG. I.
1994; Persistent chlamydiae: from cell culture to a paradigm for chlamydial pathogenesis. Microbiol Rev 58:686–699
BrownW. J, RockeyD. D.
2000; Identification of an antigen localized to an apparent septum within dividing chlamydiae. Infect Immun 68:708–715[CrossRef]
CeveniniR, DonatiM, La PlacaM.
1988; Effects of penicillin on the synthesis of membrane proteins of the Chlamydia trachomatis LGV2 serotype. FEMS Microbiol Lett 56:41–46[CrossRef]
ClarkR. B, SchatzkiP. F, DaltonH. P.
1982; Ultrastructural effect of penicillin and cycloheximide on Chlamydia trachomatis strain HAR-13. Med Microbiol Immunol 171:151–159[CrossRef]
ClarkeI. N, LambdenP. R.
1988; Stable cloning of the amino terminus of the 60 kDa outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis serovar L1. FEMS Microbiol Lett 51:81–86[CrossRef]
GhuysenJ. M, GoffinC.
1999; Lack of cell wall peptidoglycan versus penicillin sensitivity: new insights into the chlamydial anomaly. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:2339–2344
HattC, WardM. E, ClarkeI. N.
1988; Analysis of the entire nucleotide sequence of the cryptic plasmid of Chlamydia trachomatis serovar L1. Evidence for involvement in DNA replication. Nucleic Acids Res 16:4053–4067[CrossRef]
JohnsonF. W. A, HobsonD.
1977; The effect of penicillin on genital strains of Chlamydia trachomatis in tissue culture. J Antimicrob Chemother 3:49–56[CrossRef]
KramerM. J, GordonF. B.
1971; Ultra structural analysis of the effects of penicillin and chlortetracycline on the development of genital tract Chlamydia . Infect Immun 3:333–341
MathewsS. A, VolpK. M, TimmsP.
1999; Development of a quantitative gene expression assay for Chlamydia trachomatis identified temporal expression of σ factors. FEBS Lett 458:354–358[CrossRef]
MatsumotoA, ManireG. P.
1970; Electron microscopic observations on the effects of penicillin on the morphology of Chlamydia psittaci . J Bacteriol 101:278–285
PhillipsD. M, SwensonC. E, SchachterJ.
1984; Ultrastructure of Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the mouse oviduct. J Ultrastruct Res 88:244–256[CrossRef]
PickettM. A, EversonJ. S, PeadP. J, ClarkeI. N.
2005; The plasmids of Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydophila pneumoniae (N16): accurate determination of copy number and the paradoxical effect of plasmid-curing agents. Microbiology 151:893–903[CrossRef]
RockeyD. D, MatsumotoA.
2000; The chlamydial developmental cycle. In Prokaryotic Development pp 403–425 Edited by
BrunY. V., ShimketsL. J.
Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology;
SardiniaL. M, SegalE, GanemD.
1988; Developmental regulation of the cysteine-rich outer-membrane proteins of murine Chlamydia trachomatis . J Gen Microbiol 134:997–1004
ShawE. I, DooleyC. A, FischerE. R, ScidmoreM. A, FieldsK. A, HackstadtT.
2000; Three temporal classes of gene expression during the Chlamydia trachomatis developmental cycle. Mol Microbiol 37:913–925[CrossRef]
StoreyC, ChopraI.
2001; Affinities of β -lactams for penicillin binding proteins of Chlamydia trachomatis and their antichlamydial activities. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:303–305[CrossRef]
WilsonD. P, MathewsS, WanC, PettittA. N, McElwainD. L. S.
2004; Use of a quantitative gene expression assay based on micro-array techniques and a mathematical model for the investigation of chlamydial generation time. Bull Math Biol 66:523–537[CrossRef]