A cultural divide on the use of chemostats

References

1. Ferenci T. 1999a; Regulation by nutrient limitation. Curr Opin Microbiol 2:208–213 [CrossRef]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ferenci T. 1999b; ‘Growth of bacterial cultures' 50 years on: towards an uncertainty principle instead of constants in bacterial growth kinetics. Res Microbiol 150:431–438 [CrossRef]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ferenci T. 2001; Hungry bacteria – definition and properties of a nutritional state. Environ Microbiol 3:605–611 [CrossRef]
   [Google Scholar]
4. Harder W., Dijkhuizen L. 1983; Physiological responses to nutrient limitation. Annu Rev Microbiol 37:1–24 [CrossRef]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Hoskisson P. A., Hobbs G. 2005; Continuous culture – making a comeback?. Microbiology 151:3153–3159 [CrossRef]
   [Google Scholar]
6. King T., Ishihama A., Kori A., Ferenci T. 2004; A regulatory trade-off as a source of strain variation in the species Escherichia coli . J Bacteriol 186:5614–5620 [CrossRef]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Kovarova-Kovar K., Egli T. 1998; Growth kinetics of suspended microbial cells: from single-substrate-controlled growth to mixed-substrate kinetics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:646–666
   [Google Scholar]
8. Notley-McRobb L., King T., Ferenci T. 2002; rpoS mutations and loss of general stress resistance in Escherichia coli populations as a consequence of conflict between competing stress responses. J Bacteriol 184:806–811 [CrossRef]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Novick A., Szilard L. 1950; Experiments with the chemostat on spontaneous mutations of bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 36:708–719 [CrossRef]
   [Google Scholar]