1887

Abstract

A mathematical model of biofilm dynamics was used to investigate the protection from antimicrobial killing that could be afforded to micro-organisms in biofilms based on a mechanism of ‘persister’ cell or phenotypic variant formation. The persister state is a hypothetical, highly protected state adopted by a small fraction of the cells in a biofilm. Persisters were assumed to be generated at a fixed rate, independent of the presence of substrate or antimicrobial agent. Cells were assumed to revert from the persister state when exposed to the growth substrate. Persister cells were assumed to be incapable of growth. The model predicted that persister cells increased in numbers in the biofilm, even though they were unable to grow, accumulating in regions of substrate limitation. In these regions, normal cells failed to grow, but did slowly convert to the persister state. Calculations of persister formation in planktonic cultures predicted that persisters would be present in low numbers in growing cultures, but should accumulate under conditions of slow growth, e.g. very low dilution rates in continuous culture or stationary phase in batch culture. When antibiotic treatment was simulated, bacteria near the biofilm surface were killed, but persisters in the depth of the biofilm were poorly killed. After antibiotic treatment ceased, surviving persister cells quickly reverted and allowed the biofilm to regrow. This modelling study provides motivation for further investigation of the hypothetical persister cell state as an explanation for biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.27385-0
2005-01-01
2019-09-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/151/1/mic1510075.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.27385-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Balaban, N. Q., Merrin, J., Chait, R., Kowalik, L. & Leibler, S. ( 2004; ). Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science 305, 1622–1625.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, M. R. W., Allison, D. G. & Gilbert, P. ( 1988; ). Resistance of bacterial biofilms to antibiotics: a growth-rate related effect? J Antimicrob Chemother 22, 777–783.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, X. & Stewart, P. S. ( 1996; ). Chlorine penetration into artificial biofilm is limited by a reaction-diffusion interaction. Environ Sci Technol 30, 2078–2083.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dibdin, G. H., Assinder, S. J., Nichols, W. W. & Lambert, P. A. ( 1996; ). Mathematical model of beta-lactam penetration into a biofilm of Pseudomonas aeruginosa while undergoing simultaneous inactivation by released beta-lactamases. J Antimicrob Chemother 38, 757–769.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dodds, M. G., Grobe, K. J. & Stewart, P. S. ( 2000; ). Modeling biofilm antimicrobial resistance. Biotechnol Bioeng 68, 456–465.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Drenkard, E. & Ausubel, F. M. ( 2002; ). Pseudomonas biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance are linked to phenotypic variation. Nature 416, 740–742.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kissel, J. C., McCarty, P. L. & Street, R. L. ( 1984; ). Numerical simulation of mixed-culture biofilm. J Environ Eng 110, 393–411.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Laspidou, C. S. & Rittmann, B. E. ( 2004a; ). Modeling the development of biofilm density including active bacteria, inert biomass, and extracellular polymeric substances. Water Res 38, 3349–3361.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Laspidou, C. S. & Rittmann, B. E. ( 2004b; ). Evaluating trends in biofilm density using the UMCCA model. Water Res 38, 3362–3372.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Nichols, W. W., Evans, M. J., Slack, M. P. E. & Walmsley, H. L. ( 1989; ). The penetration of antibiotics into aggregates of mucoid and non-mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Gen Microbiol 135, 1291–1303.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Picioreanu, C., Kreft, J.-U. & van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. ( 2004; ). Particle-based multidimensional multispecies biofilm model. Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 3024–3040.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Rittmann, B. E. & Manem, J. A. ( 1992; ). Development and experimental evaluation of a steady-state, multispecies biofilm model. Biotechnol Bioeng 39, 914–922.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Roberts, M. E. & Stewart, P. S. ( 2004; ). Modeling antibiotic tolerance in biofilms by accounting for nutrient limitation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48, 48–52.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sanderson, S. S. & Stewart, P. S. ( 1997; ). Evidence of bacterial adaptation to monochloramine in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms and evaluation of biocide action model. Biotechnol Bioeng 56, 201–209.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Spoering, A. L. & Lewis, K. ( 2001; ). Biofilms and planktonic cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa have similar resistance to killing by antimicrobials. J Bacteriol 183, 6746–6751.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Stewart, P. S. ( 1994; ). Biofilm accumulation model that predicts antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 38, 1052–1058.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Stewart, P. S. & Costerton, J. W. ( 2001; ). Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 358, 135–138.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Stewart, P. S., Hamilton, M. A., Goldstein, B. R. & Schneider, B. T. ( 1996; ). Modeling biocide action against biofilms. Biotechnol Bioeng 49, 445–455.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Stewart, P. S., McFeters, G. A. & Huang, C.-T. ( 2000; ). Biofilm control by antimicrobial agents. In Biofilms II: Process Analysis and Applications, pp. 373–405. Edited by J. D. Bryers. New York: Wiley-Liss.
  20. Sufya, N., Allsion, D. G. & Gilbert, P. ( 2003; ). Clonal variation in maximum specific growth rate and susceptibility towards antimicrobials. J Appl Microbiol 95, 1261–1267.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wanner, O. & Gujer, W. ( 1986; ). A multispecies biofilm model. Biotechnol Bioeng 28, 314–328.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Xu, K. D., McFeters, G. A. & Stewart, P. S. ( 2000; ). Biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Microbiology 146, 547–549.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.27385-0
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.27385-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error