1887

Abstract

spp. are widely used as biopesticides and biofertilizers to control diseases and to promote positive physiological responses in plants. and assays with CECT 2413 (T34), Gv29-8 (T87) and IMI 224801 (T7) revealed that these strains affected the growth and development of lateral roots in tomato plants in different ways. The early expression profiles of these strains were studied after 20 h of incubation in the presence of tomato plants, using a high-density oligonucleotide (HDO) microarray, and compared to the profiles in the absence of plants. Out of the total 34 138 probe sets deposited on the microarray, 1077 (3.15 %) showed a significant change of at least 2-fold in expression in the presence of tomato plants. The numbers of probe sets identified in the individual strains were 593 in T34, 336 in T87 and 94 in T7. Carbohydrate metabolism – the chitin degradation enzymes -acetylglucosamine-6-phosphate deacetylase, glucosamine-6-phosphate deaminase and chitinase – was the most significantly overrepresented process commonly observed in the three strains in early interactions with tomato plants. Strains T7 and T34, which had similar positive effects on plant development in biological assays, showed a significantly overrepresented hexokinase activity in interaction with tomato. In addition, genes encoding a 40S ribosomal protein and a P23 tumour protein were altered in both these strains.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.052118-0
2012-01-01
2020-07-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/158/1/119.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.052118-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alfano G., Ivey M. L. L., Cakir C., Bos J. I. B., Miller S. A., Madden L. V., Kamoun S., Hoitink H. A. J.. ( 2007;). Systemic modulation of gene expression in tomato by Trichoderma hamatum 382. Phytopathology97:429–437 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashburner M., Ball C. A., Blake J. A., Botstein D., Butler H., Cherry J. M., Davis A. P., Dolinski K., Dwight S. S.. & other authors ( 2000;). Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet25:25–29 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Askolin S., Penttilä M., Wösten H. A., Nakari-Setälä T.. ( 2005;). The Trichoderma reesei hydrophobin genes hfb1 and hfb2 have diverse functions in fungal development. FEMS Microbiol Lett253:281–288 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bailey B. A., Bae H., Strem M. D., Roberts D. P., Thomas S. E., Crozier J., Samuels G. J., Choi I. Y., Holmes K. A.. ( 2006;). Fungal and plant gene expression during the colonization of cacao seedlings by endophytic isolates of four Trichoderma species. Planta224:1449–1464 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Benítez T., Rincón A. M., Limón M. C., Codón A. C.. ( 2004;). Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma strains. Int Microbiol7:249–260[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brotman Y., Briff E., Viterbo A., Chet I.. ( 2008;). Role of swollenin, an expansin-like protein from Trichoderma, in plant root colonization. Plant Physiol147:779–789 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brunner K., Peterbauer C. K., Mach R. L., Lorito M., Zeilinger S., Kubicek C. P.. ( 2003;). The Nag1 N-acetylglucosaminidase of Trichoderma atroviride is essential for chitinase induction by chitin and of major relevance to biocontrol. Curr Genet43:289–295[PubMed][CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Carpenter M. A., Stewart A., Ridgway H. J.. ( 2005;). Identification of novel Trichoderma hamatum genes expressed during mycoparasitism using subtractive hybridisation. FEMS Microbiol Lett251:105–112 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chacón M. R., Rodríguez-Galán O., Benítez T., Sousa S., Rey M., Llobell A., Delgado-Jarana J.. ( 2007;). Microscopic and transcriptome analyses of early colonization of tomato roots by Trichoderma harzianum . Int Microbiol10:19–27[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Contreras-Cornejo H. A., Macías-Rodríguez L., Cortés-Penagos C., López-Bucio J.. ( 2009;). Trichoderma virens, a plant beneficial fungus, enhances biomass production and promotes lateral root growth through an auxin-dependent mechanism in Arabidopsis . Plant Physiol149:1579–1592 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Djonovic S., Vargas W. A., Kolomiets M. V., Horndeski M., Wiest A., Kenerley C. M.. ( 2007;). A proteinaceous elicitor Sm1 from the beneficial fungus Trichoderma virens is required for induced systemic resistance in maize. Plant Physiol145:875–889 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Elad Y.. ( 2000;). Biological control of foliar pathogens by means of Trichoderma harzianum and potential modes of action. Crop Prot19:709–714 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Felts S. J., Toft D. O.. ( 2003;). p23, a simple protein with complex activities. Cell Stress Chaperones8:108–113 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gruber S., Vaaje-Kolstad G., Matarese F., López-Mondéjar R., Kubicek C. P., Seidl-Seiboth V.. ( 2011;). Analysis of subgroup C of fungal chitinases containing chitin-binding and LysM modules in the mycoparasite Trichoderma atroviride . Glycobiology21:122–133 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hermosa R., Viterbo A., Chet I., Monte E.. ( 2012;). Plant-beneficial effects of Trichoderma and of its genes. Microbiology158:17–25[PubMed][CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hölker U., Dohse J., Höfer M.. ( 2002;). Extracellular laccases in ascomycetes Trichoderma atroviride and Trichoderma harzianum . Folia Microbiol (Praha)47:423–427 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Howell C. R.. ( 2003;). Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma species in the biological control of plant diseases: the history and evolution of current concepts. Plant Dis87:4–10 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Howell C. R.. ( 2006;). Understanding the mechanisms employed by Trichoderma virens to effect biological control of cotton diseases. Phytopathology96:178–180 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Irizarry R. A., Hobbs B., Collin F., Beazer-Barclay Y. D., Antonellis K. J., Scherf U., Speed T. P.. ( 2003;). Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics4:249–264 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kiiskinen L. L., Kruus K., Bailey M., Ylösmäki E., Siika-Aho M., Saloheimo M.. ( 2004;). Expression of Melanocarpus albomyces laccase in Trichoderma reesei and characterization of the purified enzyme. Microbiology150:3065–3074 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kubicek C. P., Herrera-Estrella A., Seidl-Seiboth V., Martinez D. A., Druzhinina I. S., Thon M., Zeilinger S., Casas-Flores S., Horwitz B. A.. & other authors ( 2011;). Comparative genome sequence analysis underscores mycoparasitism as the ancestral life style of Trichoderma . Genome Biol12:R40 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee W. L., Bezanilla M., Pollard T. D.. ( 2000;). Fission yeast myosin-I, Myo1p, stimulates actin assembly by Arp2/3 complex and shares functions with WASp. J Cell Biol151:789–800 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu P. G., Yang Q.. ( 2005;). Identification of genes with a biocontrol function in Trichoderma harzianum mycelium using the expressed sequence tag approach. Res Microbiol156:416–423 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Livak K. J., Schmittgen T. D.. ( 2001;). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔ C t method. Methods25:402–408 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lorito M., Woo S. L., Harman G. E., Monte E.. ( 2010;). Translational research on Trichoderma: from ’omics to the field. Annu Rev Phytopathol48:395–417 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Marra R., Ambrosino P., Carbone V., Vinale F., Woo S. L., Ruocco M., Ciliento R., Lanzuise S., Ferraioli S.. & other authors ( 2006;). Study of the three-way interaction between Trichoderma atroviride, plant and fungal pathogens by using a proteomic approach. Curr Genet50:307–321 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Martinez D., Berka R. M., Henrissat B., Saloheimo M., Arvas M., Baker S. E., Chapman J., Chertkov O., Coutinho P. M.. & other authors ( 2008;). Genome sequencing and analysis of the biomass-degrading fungus Trichoderma reesei (syn. Hypocrea jecorina). Nat Biotechnol26:553–560 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mastouri F., Björkman T., Harman G. E.. ( 2010;). Seed treatment with Trichoderma harzianum alleviates biotic, abiotic, and physiological stresses in germinating seeds and seedlings. Phytopathology100:1213–1221 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mendoza-Mendoza A., Rosales-Saavedra T., Cortés C., Castellanos-Juárez V., Martínez P., Herrera-Estrella A.. ( 2007;). The MAP kinase TVK1 regulates conidiation, hydrophobicity and the expression of genes encoding cell wall proteins in the fungus Trichoderma virens . Microbiology153:2137–2147 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mikus M., Hatvani L., Neuhof T., Komoń-Zelazowska M., Dieckmann R., Schwecke T., Druzhinina I. S., von Döhren H., Kubicek C. P.. ( 2009;). Differential regulation and posttranslational processing of the class II hydrophobin genes from the biocontrol fungus Hypocrea atroviridis . Appl Environ Microbiol75:3222–3229 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Muñoz G., Nakari-Setälä T., Agosin E., Penttilä M.. ( 1997;). Hydrophobin gene srh1, expressed during sporulation of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum . Curr Genet32:225–230 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Nakari-Setälä T., Aro N., Ilmén M., Muñoz G., Kalkkinen N., Penttilä M.. ( 1997;). Differential expression of the vegetative and spore-bound hydrophobins of Trichoderma reesei – cloning and characterization of the hfb2 gene. Eur J Biochem248:415–423 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Park D. H., Mirabella R., Bronstein P. A., Preston G. M., Haring M. A., Lim C. K., Collmer A., Schuurink R. C.. ( 2010;). Mutations in γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transaminase genes in plants or Pseudomonas syringae reduce bacterial virulence. Plant J64:318–330 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Penttilä M., Nevalainen H., Rättö M., Salminen E., Knowles J.. ( 1987;). A versatile transformation system for the cellulolytic filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei . Gene61:155–164 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Prell J., Boesten B., Poole P., Priefer U. B.. ( 2002;). The Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae VF39 γ-aminobutyrate (GABA) aminotransferase gene (gabT) is induced by GABA and highly expressed in bacteroids. Microbiology148:615–623[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rotblat B., Enshell-Seijffers D., Gershoni J. M., Schuster S., Avni A.. ( 2002;). Identification of an essential component of the elicitation active site of the EIX protein elicitor. Plant J32:1049–1055 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Samolski I., de Luis A., Vizcaíno J. A., Monte E., Suárez M. B.. ( 2009;). Gene expression analysis of the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum in the presence of tomato plants, chitin, or glucose using a high-density oligonucleotide microarray. BMC Microbiol9:217 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Scherm B., Schmoll M., Balmas V., Kubicek C. P., Migheli Q.. ( 2009;). Identification of potential marker genes for Trichoderma harzianum strains with high antagonistic potential against Rhizoctonia solani by a rapid subtraction hybridization approach. Curr Genet55:81–91 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Segarra G., Casanova E., Bellido D., Odena M. A., Oliveira E., Trillas I.. ( 2007;). Proteome, salicylic acid, and jasmonic acid changes in cucumber plants inoculated with Trichoderma asperellum strain T34. Proteomics7:3943–3952 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Seidl V., Huemer B., Seiboth B., Kubicek C. P.. ( 2005;). A complete survey of Trichoderma chitinases reveals three distinct subgroups of family 18 chitinases. FEBS J272:5923–5939 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Seidl-Seiboth V., Gruber S., Sezerman U., Schwecke T., Albayrak A., Neuhof T., von Döhren H., Baker S. E., Kubicek C. P.. ( 2011;). Novel hydrophobins from Trichoderma define a new hydrophobin subclass: protein properties, evolution, regulation and processing. J Mol Evol72:339–351 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Shoresh M., Harman G. E.. ( 2008;). The molecular basis of shoot responses of maize seedlings to Trichoderma harzianum T22 inoculation of the root: a proteomic approach. Plant Physiol147:2147–2163 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Shoresh M., Harman G. E., Mastouri F.. ( 2010;). Induced systemic resistance and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents. Annu Rev Phytopathol48:21–43 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Solomon P. S., Oliver R. P.. ( 2002;). Evidence that γ-aminobutyric acid is a major nitrogen source during Cladosporium fulvum infection of tomato. Planta214:414–420 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Tucci M., Ruocco M., De Masi L., De Palma M., Lorito M.. ( 2011;). The beneficial effect of Trichoderma spp. on tomato is modulated by the plant genotype. Mol Plant Pathol12:341–354 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. van Niel E. W., Palmfeldt J., Martin R., Paese M., Hahn-Hägerdal B.. ( 2004;). Reappraisal of the regulation of lactococcal l-lactate dehydrogenase. Appl Environ Microbiol70:1843–1846 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Vargas W. A., Mandawe J. C., Kenerley C. M.. ( 2009;). Plant-derived sucrose is a key element in the symbiotic association between Trichoderma virens and maize plants. Plant Physiol151:792–808 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Vinale F., Marra R., Scala F., Ghisalberti E. L., Lorito M., Sivasithamparam K.. ( 2006;). Major secondary metabolites produced by two commercial Trichoderma strains active against different phytopathogens. Lett Appl Microbiol43:143–148 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Viterbo A., Chet I.. ( 2006;). TasHyd1, a new hydrophobin gene from the biocontrol agent Trichoderma asperellum, is involved in plant root colonization. Mol Plant Pathol7:249–258 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Viterbo A., Wiest A., Brotman Y., Chet I., Kenerley C.. ( 2007;). The 18mer peptaibols from Trichoderma virens elicit plant defence responses. Mol Plant Pathol8:737–746 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Vizcaíno J. A., González F. J., Suárez M. B., Redondo J., Heinrich J., Delgado-Jarana J., Hermosa R., Gutiérrez S., Monte E.. & other authors ( 2006;). Generation, annotation and analysis of ESTs from Trichoderma harzianum CECT 2413. BMC Genomics7:193 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Vizcaíno J. A., Redondo J., Suárez M. B., Cardoza R. E., Hermosa R., González F. J., Rey M., Monte E.. ( 2007;). Generation, annotation, and analysis of ESTs from four different Trichoderma strains grown under conditions related to biocontrol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol75:853–862 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Woo S. L., Scala F., Ruocco M., Lorito M.. ( 2006;). The molecular biology of the interactions between Trichoderma spp., phytopathogenic fungi, and plants. Phytopathology96:181–185 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.052118-0
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.052118-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error