Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Structural components of the cell surface have an impact on some of the beneficial attributes of probiotic bacteria. analysis of the NCFM genome sequence revealed the presence of a putative cell surface protein that was predicted to be a myosin cross-reactive antigen (MCRA). As MCRAs are conserved among many probiotic bacteria, we used the -based counterselective gene replacement system, designed recently for use in , to determine the functional role of this gene (LBA649) in NCFM. Phenotypic assays were undertaken with the parent strain (NCK1909) and deletion mutant (NCK2015) to assign a function for this gene. The growth of NCK2015 (ΔLBA649) was reduced in the presence of lactate, acetate, porcine bile and salt. Adhesion of NCK2015 to Caco-2 cells was substantially reduced for both stationary-phase (∼45 % reduction) and exponential-phase cells (∼50 % reduction). Analysis of NCK2015 by scanning electron microscopy revealed a longer cell morphology after growth in MRS broth compared to NCK1909. These results indicate a role for LBA649 in stress tolerance, cell wall division and adherence to Caco-2 cells.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.043158-0
2010-11-01
2025-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/156/11/3360.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.043158-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Altermann E., Russell W. M., Azcarate-Peril M. A., Barrangou R., Buck B. L., McAuliffe O., Souther N., Dobson A., Duong T. other authors 2005; Complete genome sequence of the probiotic lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:3906–3912
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Altschul S. F., Lipman D. J. 1990; Protein database searches for multiple alignments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:5509–5513
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Azcarate-Peril M. A., Altermann E., Hoover-Fitzula R. L., Cano R. J., Klaenhammer T. R. 2004; Identification and inactivation of genetic loci involved with Lactobacillus acidophilus acid tolerance. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:5315–5322
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Azcarate-Peril M. A., McAuliffe O., Altermann E., Lick S., Russell W. M., Klaenhammer T. R. 2005; Microarray analysis of a two-component regulatory system involved in acid resistance and proteolytic activity in Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5794–5804
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Azcarate-Peril M. A., Bruno-Barcena J. M., Hassan H. M., Klaenhammer T. R. 2006; Transcriptional and functional analysis of oxalyl-coenzyme A (CoA) decarboxylase and formyl-CoA transferase genes from Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1891–1899
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Barrangou R., Altermann E., Hutkins R., Cano R., Klaenhammer T. R. 2003; Functional and comparative genomic analyses of an operon involved in fructooligosaccharide utilization by Lactobacillus acidophilus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:8957–8962
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Barrangou R., Azcarate-Peril M. A., Duong T., Conners S. B., Kelly R. M., Klaenhammer T. R. 2006; Global analysis of carbohydrate utilization by Lactobacillus acidophilus using cDNA microarrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:3816–3821
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Båth K., Roos S., Wall T., Jonsson H. 2005; The cell surface of Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730 highlighted by identification of 126 extracellular proteins from the genome sequence. FEMS Microbiol Lett 253:75–82
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Begley M., Gahan C. G., Hill C. 2005; The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:625–651
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bendtsen J. D., Nielsen H., von Heijne G., Brunak S. 2004; Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol 340:783–795
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bevers L. E., Pinkse M. W., Verhaert P. D., Hagen W. R. 2009; Oleate hydratase catalyzes the hydration of a nonactivated carbon–carbon bond. J Bacteriol 191:5010–5012
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Boneca I. G., Dussurget O., Cabanes D., Nahori M. A., Sousa S., Lecuit M., Psylinakis E., Bouriotis V., Hugot J. P. & other authors 2007; A critical role for peptidoglycan N-deacetylation in Listeria evasion from the host innate immune system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:997–1002
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Buck B. L., Altermann E., Svingerud T., Klaenhammer T. R. 2005; Functional analysis of putative adhesion factors in Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8344–8351
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Buck B. L., Azcarate-Peril M. A., Klaenhammer T. R. 2009; Role of autoinducer-2 on the adhesion ability of Lactobacillus acidophilus. J Appl Microbiol 107:269–279
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Claros M. G., von Heijne G. 1994; TopPred II: an improved software for membrane protein structure predictions. Comput Appl Biosci 10:685–686
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Coakley M., Ross R. P., Nordgren M., Fitzgerald G., Devery R., Stanton C. 2003; Conjugated linoleic acid biosynthesis by human-derived Bifidobacterium species. J Appl Microbiol 94:138–145
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cserzö M., Eisenhaber F., Eisenhaber B., Simon I. 2002; On filtering false positive transmembrane protein predictions. Protein Eng 15:745–752
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dobson A. E., Sanozky-Dawes R. B., Klaenhammer T. R. 2007; Identification of an operon and inducing peptide involved in the production of lactacin B by Lactobacillus acidophilus. J Appl Microbiol 103:1766–1778
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fischer H., Yamamoto M., Akira S., Beutler B., Svanborg C. 2006; Mechanism of pathogen-specific TLR4 activation in the mucosa: fimbriae, recognition receptors and adaptor protein selection. Eur J Immunol 36:267–277
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Goh Y. J., Azcarate-Peril M. A., O'Flaherty S., Durmaz E., Valence F., Jardin J., Lortal S., Klaenhammer T. R. 2009; Development and application of a upp-based counterselective gene replacement system for the study of the S-layer protein SlpX of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:3093–3105
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gopal P. K., Prasad J., Smart J., Gill H. S. 2001; In vitro adherence properties of Lactobacillus rhamnosus DR20 and Bifidobacterium lactis DR10 strains and their antagonistic activity against an enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Int J Food Microbiol 67:207–216
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Grangette C., Nutten S., Palumbo E., Morath S., Hermann C., Dewulf J., Pot B., Hartung T., Hols P., Mercenier A. 2005; Enhanced antiinflammatory capacity of a Lactobacillus plantarum mutant synthesizing modified teichoic acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:10321–10326
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hanahan D. 1985; Techniques for transformation of E. coli. In DNA Cloning: a Practical Approach pp 109–135 Edited by Glover D. M. Oxford, UK: IRL Press Ltd;
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Jenkins J. K., Courtney P. D. 2003; Lactobacillus growth and membrane composition in the presence of linoleic or conjugated linoleic acid. Can J Microbiol 49:51–57
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kil K. S., Cunningham M. W., Barnett L. A. 1994; Cloning and sequence analysis of a gene encoding a 67-kilodalton myosin-cross-reactive antigen of Streptococcus pyogenes reveals its similarity with class II major histocompatibility antigens. Infect Immun 62:2440–2449
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kingsford C. L., Ayanbule K., Salzberg S. L. 2007; Rapid, accurate, computational discovery of Rho-independent transcription terminators illuminates their relationship to DNA uptake. Genome Biol 8:R22
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Konstantinov S. R., Smidt H., de Vos W. M., Bruijns S. C., Singh S. K., Valence F., Molle D., Lortal S., Altermann E. other authors 2008; S layer protein A of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM regulates immature dendritic cell and T cell functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:19474–19479
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Krogh A., Larsson B., von Heijne G., Sonnhammer E. L. 2001; Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305:567–580
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Law J., Buist G., Haandrikman A., Kok J., Venema G., Leenhouts K. 1995; A system to generate chromosomal mutations in Lactococcus lactis which allows fast analysis of targeted genes. J Bacteriol 177:7011–7018
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lebeer S., Vanderleyden J., De Keersmaecker S. C. 2010; Host interactions of probiotic bacterial surface molecules: comparison with commensals and pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:171–184
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Leyer G. J., Li S., Mubasher M. E., Reifer C., Ouwehand A. C. 2009; Probiotic effects on cold and influenza-like symptom incidence and duration in children. Pediatrics 124:e172–e179
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Liévin-Le Moal V., Sarrazin-Davila L. E., Servin A. L. 2007; An experimental study and a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the antisecretory activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB against nonrotavirus diarrhea. Pediatrics 120:e795–e803
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lin C. K., Tsai H. C., Lin P. P., Tsen H. Y., Tsai C. C. 2008; Lactobacillus acidophilus LAP5 able to inhibit the Salmonella choleraesuis invasion to the human Caco-2 epithelial cell. Anaerobe 14:251–255
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mohamadzadeh M., Klaenhammer T. R. 2008; Specific Lactobacillus species differentially activate Toll-like receptors and downstream signals in dendritic cells. Expert Rev Vaccines 7:1155–1164
    [Google Scholar]
  35. O'Flaherty S., Klaenhammer T. R. 2010; The role and potential of probiotic bacteria in the gut, and the communication between gut microflora and gut/host. Int Dairy J 20:262–268
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Pfeiler E. A., Klaenhammer T. R. 2009; Role of transporter proteins in bile tolerance of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:6013–6016
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Pfeiler E. A., Azcarate-Peril M. A., Klaenhammer T. R. 2007; Characterization of a novel bile-inducible operon encoding a two-component regulatory system in Lactobacillus acidophilus. J Bacteriol 189:4624–4634
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Quevillon E., Silventoinen V., Pillai S., Harte N., Mulder N., Apweiler R., Lopez R. 2005; InterProScan: protein domains identifier. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W116–W120
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Roos S., Engstrand L., Jonsson H. 2005; Lactobacillus gastricus sp. nov., Lactobacillus antri sp.nov., Lactobacillus kalixensis sp. nov. and Lactobacillus ultunensis sp. nov., isolated from human stomach mucosa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:77–82
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Rousseaux C., Thuru X., Gelot A., Barnich N., Neut C., Dubuquoy L., Dubuquoy C., Merour E., Geboes K. other authors 2007; Lactobacillus acidophilus modulates intestinal pain and induces opioid and cannabinoid receptors. Nat Med 13:35–37
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Russell W. M., Klaenhammer T. R. 2001; Efficient system for directed integration into the Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus gasseri chromosomes via homologous recombination. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4361–4364
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sambrook J., Russel D. W. 2001 Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory;
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Tusnády G. E., Simon I. 2001; The hmmtop transmembrane topology prediction server. Bioinformatics 17:849–850
    [Google Scholar]
  44. van Pijkeren J. P., Canchaya C., Ryan K. A., Li Y., Claesson M. J., Sheil B., Steidler L., O'Mahony L., Fitzgerald G. F. & other authors 2006; Comparative and functional analysis of sortase-dependent proteins in the predicted secretome of Lactobacillus salivarius UCC118. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:4143–4153
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Volkov A., Liavonchanka A., Kamneva O., Fiedler T., Goebel C., Kreikemeyer B., Feussner I. 2010; Myosin cross-reactive antigen of Streptococcus pyogenes M49 encodes a fatty acid double bond hydratase that plays a role in oleic acid detoxification and bacterial virulence. J Biol Chem 285:10353–10361
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Walker D. C., Aoyama K., Klaenhammer T. R. 1996; Electrotransformation of Lactobacillus acidophilus group A1. FEMS Microbiol Lett 138:233–237
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.043158-0
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.043158-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error