2FNC1†Present address: Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Apartado 14, P-781-901 Oeiras, Portugal.
2FNC‡Present address: Centro de Estudos de Vectores e Doenças Infecciosas Dr Francisco Cambournac, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr Ricardo Jorge I.P., Av. Liberdade no. 5, 965-575 Águas de Moura, Portugal.
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of chromosomal single and double restriction profiles of 17 strains belonging to three genera of ‘Leuconostocaceae’ was done, resulting in physical and genetic maps for three Fructobacillus, six Leuconostoc and four Weissella strains. AscI, I-CeuI, NotI and SfiI restriction enzymes were used together with Southern hybridization of selected probes to provide an assessment of genomic organization in different species. Estimated genome sizes varied from 1408 kb to 1547 kb in Fructobacillus, from 1644 kb to 2133 kb in Leuconostoc and from 1371 kb to 2197 kb in Weissella. Other genomic characteristics of interest were analysed, such as oriC and terC localization and rrn operon organization. The latter seems markedly different in Weissella, in both number and disposition in the chromosome. Comparisons of intra- and intergeneric features are discussed in the light of chromosome rearrangements and genomic evolution.
AcinasS. G.,
MarcelinoL. A.,
Klepac-CerajV.,
PolzM. F.2004; Divergence and redundancy of 16S rRNA sequences in genomes with multiple rrn operons. J Bacteriol 186:2629–2635
CheloI. M.,
Zé-ZéL.,
ChambelL.,
TenreiroR.2004; Physical and genetic map of the Weissella paramesenteroides DSMZ 20288T chromosome and characterization of different rrn operons by ITS analysis. Microbiology 150:4075–4084
CheloI. M.,
Zé-ZéL.,
TenreiroR.2007; Congruence of evolutionary relationships inside the Leuconostoc-Oenococcus-Weissella clade assessed by phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene, dnaA, gyrB, rpoC and dnaK . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:276–286
CollinsM. D.,
SamelisJ.,
MetaxopoulosJ.,
WallbanksS.1993; Taxonomic studies on some Leuconostoc-like organisms from fermented sausages: description of a new genus Weissella for the Leuconostoc paramesenteroides group of species. J Appl Bacteriol 75:595–603
De BruyneK.,
SchillingerU.,
CarolineL.,
BoehringerB.,
CleenwerckI.,
VancanneytM.,
De VuystL.,
FranzM. A. P.,
VandammeP.2007; Leuconostoc holzapfelii sp. nov., isolated from Ethiopian coffee fermentation and assessment of sequence analysis of housekeeping genes for delineation of Leuconostoc species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:2952–2959
de VriesM. C.,
SiezenR. J.,
WijmanJ. G. E.,
ZhaoY.,
KleerebezemM.,
de VosW. M.,
VaughanE. E.2005; Comparative and functional analysis of the rRNA-operons and their tRNA gene complement in different lactic acid bacteria. Syst Appl Microbiol 29:358–367
EisenJ. A.,
HeidelbergJ. F.,
WhiteO.,
SalzbergS. L.2000; Evidence for symmetric chromosomal inversions around the replication origin in bacteria. Genome Biol 1: RESEARCH0011
EndoA.,
OkadaS.2006; Oenococcus kitaharae sp. nov., a non-acidophilic and non-malolactic-fermenting oenococcus isolated from a composting distilled shochu residue. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:2345–2348
EndoA.,
OkadaS.2008; Reclassification of the genus Leuconostoc and proposals of Fructobacillus fructosus gen.nov., comb. nov., Fructobacillus durionis comb. nov.,Fructobacillus ficulneus comb. nov. and Fructobacillus pseudoficulneus comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:2195–2205
HolzapfelW. H.,
SchilingerU.1991; The Genus Leuconostoc . In The Prokaryotes vol. 3 pp 1508–1533 Edited by
BalowsA.,
TrüperH. G.,
DworkinM.,
HarderW.,
ScheiferK.
Berlin: Springer;
KandlerO.,
WeissN.1986; Regular, nonsporing gram-positive rods. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology vol. 2 pp 1208–1234 Edited by
HoltJ. G.,
SneathP. H. A.,
MairN. S.,
SharpeM. E.
Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins;
KlaenhammerT. R.,
BarrangouR.,
BuckB. L.,
Azcarate-PerilM. A.,
AltermanE.2005; Genomic features of lactic acid bacteria effecting bioprocessing and health. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:393–409
LamoureuxM.,
PrévostH.,
CavinJ. F.,
DivièsC.1993; Recognition of Leuconostoc oenos strains by the use of DNA restriction profiles. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 39:547–552
Le BourgeoisP.,
Daveran-MingotM.,
RitzenthalerP.2000; Genome plasticity among related Lactococcus strains: identification of genetic events associated with macrorestriction polymorphisms. J Bacteriol 182:2481–2491
MakarovaK.,
SlesarevA.,
WolfY.,
SorokinA.,
MirkinB.,
KooninE.,
PavlovA.,
PavlovaN.,
KaramychevV.other authors2006; Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:15611–15616
MarcobalA. M.,
SelaD. A.,
WolfY. I.,
MakarovaK. S.,
MillsD. A.2007; The role of hypermutability in the evolution of the genus Oenococcus . J Bacteriol 190:564–570
Martinez-MurciaA. J.,
CollinsM. D.1990; A phylogenetic analysis of the genus Leuconostoc based on reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett 58:73–84
TenreiroR.,
SantosM. A.,
PaveiaH.,
VieiraG.1994; Inter-strain relationships among wine leuconostocs and their divergence from other Leuconostoc species, as revealed by low frequency restriction fragment analysis of genomic DNA. J Appl Bacteriol 77:271–280
YangD.,
WoeseC. R.1989; Phylogenetic structure of the “Leuconostocs”: an interesting case of a rapidly evolving organism. Syst Appl Microbiol 12:145–149
Zé-ZéL.,
TenreiroR.,
BritoL.,
SantosM.,
PaveiaH.1998; Physical map of the genome of Oenococcus oeni PSU-1 and localization of genetic markers. Microbiology 144:1145–1156
Zé-ZéL.,
TenreiroR.,
PaveiaH.2000; The Oenococcus oeni genome: physical and genetic mapping of strain GM and comparison with the genome of a ‘divergent’ strain, PSU-1. Microbiology 146:3195–3204
Zé-ZéL.,
CheloI. M.,
TenreiroR.2008; Genome organization in Oenococus strains studied by comparison of physical and genetic maps. Int Microbiol 11:237–244