Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Cationic peptides, particularly those rich in arginine and/or lysine residues, are usually promising antimicrobial agents effective at low concentrations in laboratory settings. However, their applicability in pharmaceutics and biotechnology is currently limited due to their susceptibility to biological enzymatic processes and (in some cases) toxicity to host cells. To address this, we screened eight linear arginine-rich peptides for their haemolytic properties and antimicrobial activity using a set of computational and experimental assays. Inspired by our previous results on R4F4, we then designed three modified peptides based on an R4F4 backbone, R4F4-C16, -R4F4 and cyclic R4F4, and one based on R4 (R4-C16). Amongst the tested linear peptides containing only natural amino acids, R4F4 exhibited the strongest antibacterial activity; however, this effect was reduced in the presence of human serum and trypsin. Conversely, our study demonstrated that cyclization and substitution to its -amino acid enantiomer significantly enhanced stability and activity of R4F4, whilst in the presence of proteases. As revealed by fluorescence imaging, microscopy RNA sequencing analysis, the mode of action involves complex and dynamic events. This multifaceted antimicrobial mechanism integrates alterations in membrane permeability, modulation of intracellular reactive oxygen species levels and changes in transcriptomic signature profiles. At the molecular level, notable changes were observed in the bacterial expression of genes associated with metabolic pathways and biological processes. Furthermore, R4F4-derived peptides showed substantial antibiofilm activity in preventing the formation and disruption of mature biofilms, together with good cytocompatibility, highlighting the potential for clinical applicability. In conclusion, this study emphasizes the importance of optimizing the stability of peptide-based antimicrobials, particularly those rich in arginine, and highlights the advantages of incorporating -amino acids and cyclization for enhanced performance. This information will prove useful in the future design of antimicrobial peptides. In addition, the molecular perspective on peptide-induced gene expression changes, as identified by RNA-seq, broadens our understanding of antimicrobial peptides’ activities and provides a clearer picture of their versatile mechanisms.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • UK Research and Innovation (Award EP/V053396/1)
    • Principal Award Recipient: IanW. Hamley
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001657
2026-02-04
2026-02-07

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/172/2/mic001657.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001657&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ahmed SK, Hussein S, Qurbani K, Ibrahim RH, Fareeq A et al. Antimicrobial resistance: Impacts, challenges, and future prospects. J Med Surg Public Health 2024; 2:100081 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Santos-Júnior CD, Torres MDT, Duan Y, Rodríguez Del Río Á, Schmidt TSB et al. Discovery of antimicrobial peptides in the global microbiome with machine learning. Cell 2024; 187:3761–3778 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Purohit K, Reddy N, Sunna A. Exploring the potential of bioactive peptides: from natural sources to therapeutics. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:25 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Tucker AT, Leonard SP, DuBois CD, Knauf GA, Cunningham AL et al. Discovery of next-generation antimicrobials through bacterial self-screening of surface-displayed peptide libraries. Cell 2018; 172:618–628 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mendes B, Edwards-Gayle C, Barrett G. Peptide lipidation and shortening optimises antibacterial, antibiofilm and membranolytic actions of an amphiphilic polylysine-polyphenyalanine octapeptide. Curr Res Biotech 2024; 8:100240 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mendes B, Almeida JR, Vale N, Gomes P, Gadelha FR et al. Potential use of 13-mer peptides based on phospholipase and oligoarginine as leishmanicidal agents. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 2019; 226:108612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Duca S, Nikoi ND, Berrow M, Barber L, Slope LN et al. Oligoarginine peptide structure and its effect on cell penetration in ocular drug delivery. Heliyon 2024; 10:e35109 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gopal R, Kim YJ, Seo CH, Hahm KS, Park Y. Reversed sequence enhances antimicrobial activity of a synthetic peptide. J Pept Sci 2011; 17:329–334 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Adak A, Castelletto V, de Mello L, Mendes B, Barrett G et al. Effect of chirality and amphiphilicity on the antimicrobial activity of tripodal lysine-based peptides. ACS Appl Bio Mater 2025; 8:803–813 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Edwards-Gayle CJC, Barrett G, Roy S, Castelletto V, Seitsonen J et al. Selective antibacterial activity and lipid membrane interactions of arginine-rich amphiphilic peptides. ACS Appl Bio Mater 2020; 3:1165–1175 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang R, Yan H, Wang X, Cong H, Yu B et al. Screening of a short chain antimicrobial peptide-FWKFK and its application in wound healing. Biomater Sci 2023; 11:1867–1875 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Edwards-Gayle CJC, Castelletto V, Hamley IW, Barrett G, Greco F et al. Self-assembly, antimicrobial activity, and membrane interactions of arginine-capped peptide bola-amphiphiles. ACS Appl Bio Mater 2019; 2:2208–2218 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Castelletto V, Barnes RH, Karatzas K-A, Edwards-Gayle CJC, Greco F et al. Arginine-containing surfactant-like peptides: interaction with lipid membranes and antimicrobial activity. Biomacromolecules 2018; 19:2782–2794 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Luo X, Ye X, Ding L, Zhu W, Yi P et al. Fine-tuning of alkaline residues on the hydrophilic face provides a non-toxic cationic α-helical antimicrobial peptide against antibiotic-resistant ESKAPE pathogens. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:684591 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bacalum M, Radu M. Cationic antimicrobial peptides cytotoxicity on mammalian cells: an analysis using therapeutic index integrative concept. Int J Pept Res Ther 2015; 21:47–55 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Cole KP, Ryan SJ, Groh JM, Miller RD. Reagent-free continuous thermal tert-butyl ester deprotection. Bioorg Med Chem 2017; 25:6209–6217 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Almeida JR, Palacios ALV, Patiño RSP, Mendes B, Teixeira CAS et al. Harnessing snake venom phospholipases A2 to novel approaches for overcoming antibiotic resistance. Drug Dev Res 2019; 80:68–85 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Rounds T, Straus SK. Lipidation of antimicrobial peptides as a design strategy for future alternatives to antibiotics. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:9692 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Li Y, Clark KA, Tan Z. Methods for engineering therapeutic peptides. Chinese Chem Lett 2018; 29:1074–1078 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Meena KR, Kanwar SS. Lipopeptides as the antifungal and antibacterial agents: applications in food safety and therapeutics. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015:473050 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Steenbergen JN, Alder J, Thorne GM, Tally FP. Daptomycin: a lipopeptide antibiotic for the treatment of serious Gram-positive infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 55:283–288 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Schneider T, Müller A, Miess H, Gross H. Cyclic lipopeptides as antibacterial agents - potent antibiotic activity mediated by intriguing mode of actions. Int J Med Microbiol 2014; 304:37–43 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang J, Sintim HO. Antibiotics That Disrupt Cell Wall and Bacterial Membrane Formation and Integrity. In In Reference Module in Biomedical Sciences Elsevier; 2014 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Decker AP, Mechesso AF, Wang G. Expanding the landscape of amino acid-rich antimicrobial peptides: definition, deployment in nature, implications for peptide design and therapeutic potential. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:12874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Fan L, Sun J, Zhou M, Zhou J, Lao X et al. DRAMP: a comprehensive data repository of antimicrobial peptides. Sci Rep 2016; 6:24482 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. O’Toole GA. Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. J Vis Exp 20112437 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Peña-Carrillo MS, Pinos-Tamayo EA, Mendes B, Domínguez-Borbor C, Proaño-Bolaños C et al. Dissection of phospholipases A2 reveals multifaceted peptides targeting cancer cells, Leishmania and bacteria. Bioorg Chem 2021; 114:105041 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Almeida JR. The century-long journey of peptide-based drugs. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:196 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Cresti L, Cappello G, Pini A. Antimicrobial peptides towards clinical application-a long history to be concluded. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:25 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mookherjee N, Anderson MA, Haagsman HP, Davidson DJ. Antimicrobial host defence peptides: functions and clinical potential. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2020; 19:311–332 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Botelho Sampaio de Oliveira K, Lopes Leite M, Albuquerque Cunha V, Brito da Cunha N, Luiz Franco O. Challenges and advances in antimicrobial peptide development. Drug Discovery Today 2023; 28:103629 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Xuan J, Feng W, Wang J, Wang R, Zhang B et al. Antimicrobial peptides for combating drug-resistant bacterial infections. Drug Resist Updat 2023; 68:100954 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Li J, Koh J-J, Liu S, Lakshminarayanan R, Verma CS et al. Membrane active antimicrobial peptides: translating mechanistic insights to design. Front Neurosci 2017; 11:73 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhu M, Chen J, Lin Y. Exploring chemical space and structural diversity of supramolecular peptide materials. Supramol Mater 2023; 2:100030 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Capecchi A, Reymond J-L. Peptides in chemical space. Med Drug Dis 2021; 9:100081 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Yang B, Yang H, Liang J, Chen J, Wang C et al. A review on the screening methods for the discovery of natural antimicrobial peptides. J Pharm Anal 2025; 15:101046 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Szymczak P, Szczurek E. Artificial intelligence-driven antimicrobial peptide discovery. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2023; 83:102733 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Chang L, Mondal A, Singh B, Martínez-Noa Y, Perez A. Revolutionizing peptide-based drug discovery: advances in the post-alphafold era. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci 2024; 14:e1693 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Almeida JR, Mendes B, Lancellotti M, Franchi GC Jr, Passos Ó et al. Lessons from a single amino acid substitution: anticancer and antibacterial properties of two phospholipase A2-derived peptides. CIMB 2022; 44:46–62 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Feijoo-Coronel ML, Mendes B, Ramírez D, Peña-Varas C, de Los Monteros-Silva NQE et al. Antibacterial and antiviral properties of chenopodin-derived synthetic peptides. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:78 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Bello-Madruga R, Torrent Burgas M. The limits of prediction: why intrinsically disordered regions challenge our understanding of antimicrobial peptides. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2024; 23:972–981 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Cardoso MH, Orozco RQ, Rezende SB, Rodrigues G, Oshiro KGN et al. Computer-aided design of antimicrobial peptides: are we generating effective drug candidates?. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:3097 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Joondan N, Jhaumeer-Laulloo S, Caumul P. A study of the antibacterial activity of L-phenylalanine and L-tyrosine esters in relation to their CMCs and their interactions with 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, DPPC as model membrane. Microbiol Res 2014; 169:675–685 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Valdivieso-Rivera F, Bermúdez-Puga S, Proaño-Bolaños C, Almeida JR. Deciphering the limitations and antibacterial mechanism of cruzioseptins. Int J Pept Res Ther 2022; 28:73 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Lu J, Xu H, Xia J, Ma J, Xu J et al. D- and unnatural amino acid substituted antimicrobial peptides with improved proteolytic resistance and their proteolytic degradation characteristics. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:563030 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Lin B, Hung A, Singleton W, Darmawan KK, Moses R et al. The effect of tailing lipidation on the bioactivity of antimicrobial peptides and their aggregation tendency. Aggregate 2023; 4: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Makowska M, Wardowska A, Bauer M, Wyrzykowski D, Małuch I et al. Impact of lipidation site on the activity of α-helical antimicrobial peptides. Bioorg Chem 2024; 153:107821 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Grimsey E, Collis DWP, Mikut R, Hilpert K. The effect of lipidation and glycosylation on short cationic antimicrobial peptides. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes 2020; 1862:183195 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Saghiri A, Reza Bozorgmehr M, Morsali A. Deciphering the impact of cyclization and lysine charges on antimicrobial peptides using molecular dynamics simulations and density functional theory. ChemistrySelect 2024; 9:e202401879 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Garton M, Nim S, Stone TA, Wang KE, Deber CM et al. Method to generate highly stable D-amino acid analogs of bioactive helical peptides using a mirror image of the entire PDB. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018; 115:1505–1510 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Upert G, Luther A, Obrecht D, Ermert P. Emerging peptide antibiotics with therapeutic potential. Med Drug Discov 2021; 9:100078 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Kang S-J, Nam SH, Lee B-J. Engineering approaches for the development of antimicrobial peptide-based antibiotics. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:1338 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang L, Rozek A, Hancock REW. Interaction of cationic antimicrobial peptides with model membranes. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:35714–35722 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Wimley WC. Describing the mechanism of antimicrobial peptide action with the interfacial activity model. ACS Chem Biol 2010; 5:905–917 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Oyinloye BE, Adenowo AF, Kappo AP. Reactive oxygen species, apoptosis, antimicrobial peptides and human inflammatory diseases. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2015; 8:151–175 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Rowe-Magnus DA, Kao AY, Prieto AC, Pu M, Kao C. Cathelicidin peptides restrict bacterial growth via membrane perturbation and induction of reactive oxygen species. mBio 2019; 10:e02021-19 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Schmidt N, Mishra A, Lai GH, Wong GCL. Arginine-rich cell-penetrating peptides. FEBS Lett 2010; 584:1806–1813 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Sun A, Huang Z, He L, Dong W, Tian Y et al. Metabolomic analyses reveal the antibacterial properties of a novel antimicrobial peptide MOp3 from Moringa oleifera seeds against Staphylococcus aureus and its application in the infecting pasteurized milk. Food Control 2023; 150:109779 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Bermúdez-Puga S, Dias M, Freire de Oliveira T, Mendonça CMN, Yokomizo de Almeida SR et al. Dual antibacterial mechanism of [K4K15]CZS-1 against Salmonella Typhimurium: a membrane active and intracellular-targeting antimicrobial peptide. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1320154 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Ditsawanon T, Phaonakrob N, Roytrakul S. Mechanisms of antimicrobial peptides from bagasse against human pathogenic bacteria. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:448 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Tomasinsig L, Scocchi M, Mettulio R, Zanetti M. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of the Escherichia coli response to a proline-rich antimicrobial peptide. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48:3260–3267 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Georgieva M, Heinonen T, Vitale A, Hargraves S, Causevic S et al. Bacterial surface properties influence the activity of the TAT-RasGAP317-326 antimicrobial peptide. iScience 2021; 24:102923 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Hong RW, Shchepetov M, Weiser JN, Axelsen PH. Transcriptional profile of the Escherichia coli response to the antimicrobial insect peptide cecropin A. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47:1–6 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Tang Y, Yang C, Zhao J, Heng H, Peng M et al. LTX-315 is a novel broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptide against clinical multidrug-resistant bacteria. J Adv Res 2025; 76:715–729 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Cardoso MH, de Almeida KC, Cândido ES, Fernandes G da R, Dias SC et al. Comparative transcriptome analyses of magainin I-susceptible and -resistant Escherichia coli strains. Microbiology (Reading) 2018; 164:1383–1393 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhao K, Liu M, Burgess RR. Adaptation in bacterial flagellar and motility systems: from regulon members to ‘foraging’-like behavior in E. coli. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:4441–4452 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Ikeda T, Shinagawa T, Ito T, Ohno Y, Kubo A et al. Hypoosmotic stress induces flagellar biosynthesis and swimming motility in Escherichia albertii. Commun Biol 2020; 3:87 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Avci FG, Sariyar Akbulut B, Ozkirimli E. Membrane active peptides and their biophysical characterization. Biomolecules 2018; 8:77 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Andrews SC, Robinson AK, Rodríguez-Quiñones F. Bacterial iron homeostasis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2003; 27:215–237 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Tawfik MM, Bertelsen M, Abdel-Rahman MA, Strong PN, Miller K. Scorpion venom antimicrobial peptides induce siderophore biosynthesis and oxidative stress responses in Escherichia coli. mSphere 2021; 6:10 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Pletzer D, Mansour SC, Hancock REW. Synergy between conventional antibiotics and anti-biofilm peptides in a murine, sub-cutaneous abscess model caused by recalcitrant ESKAPE pathogens. PLOS Pathog 2018; 14:e1007084 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Duan H, Zhang X, Li Z, Yuan J, Shen F et al. Synergistic effect and antibiofilm activity of an antimicrobial peptide with traditional antibiotics against multi-drug resistant bacteria. Microb Pathog 2021; 158:105056 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  73. de la Fuente-Núñez C, Cardoso MH, de Souza Cândido E, Franco OL, Hancock REW. Synthetic antibiofilm peptides. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes 2016; 1858:1061–1069 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001657
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001657
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error