Skip to content
1887

Abstract

To develop a low-cost, environmentally friendly taurine fermentation method for sustainable marine fish culture using feed derived from photosynthetically produced agricultural products, it is crucial to study cysteine sulfinic acid decarboxylase (CSAD), a key enzyme in the taurine biosynthetic pathway in applicable microorganisms. In this study, a method was devised to screen for CSAD genes using growth as an indicator, based on sulfur assimilation following the decarboxylation of -cysteic acid, a taurine precursor compound. The used has a double deletion mutation of (sulfate/thiosulfate ABC transporter) and (FMNH-dependent alkanesulfonate monooxygenase) genes. If needed, an additional defect in enzyme genes, such as (adenylyl-sulfate kinase), which participates in the pathway reducing sulfate to sulfite, is also introduced. Using this method, it was demonstrated that the glutamic acid decarboxylase gene from possesses CSAD activity. The identified decarboxylase was further confirmed to act on -cysteine sulfinic acid. Additionally, two observations made during method refinement to reduce background growth in screening are discussed: that SsuD is involved in sulfur assimilation from an unknown sulfur compound and that certain (mechanosensitive channel) missense mutations enable external sulfate above a specific concentration to enter the cell.

  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001620
2025-11-04
2025-11-16

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/171/11/mic001620.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001620&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Duszka K. Versatile triad alliance: bile acid, taurine and microbiota. Cells 2022; 11:2337 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Jong CJ, Sandal P, Schaffer SW. The role of taurine in mitochondria health: more than just an antioxidant. Molecules 2021; 26:4913 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lambert IH, Kristensen DM, Holm JB, Mortensen OH. Physiological role of taurine – from organism to organelle. Acta Physiologica 2015; 213:191–212 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Inoue K, Tsukuda K, Koito T, Miyazaki Y, Hosoi M et al. Possible role of a taurine transporter in the deep-sea mussel Bathymodiolus septemdierum in adaptation to hydrothermal vents. FEBS Lett 2008; 582:1542–1546 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Park GS, Takeuchi T, Yokoyama M, Seikai T. Optimal dietary taurine level for growth of juvenile Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. Fish Sci 2002; 68:824–829 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Goto T, Takagi S, Ichiki T, Sakai T, Endo M et al. Studies on the green liver in cultured red sea bream fed low level and non-fish meal diets: relationship between hepatic taurine and biliverdin levels. Fisheries Sci 2001; 67:58–63 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Pinto W, Rønnestad I, Dinis MT, Aragão C. Taurine and fish development: insights for the aquaculture industry. Adv Exp Med Biol 2013; 776:329–334 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Watson AM, Barrows FT, Place AR. Taurine supplementation of plant derived protein and n-3 fatty acids are critical for optimal growth and development of cobia, Rachycentron canadum. Lipids 2013; 48:899–913 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. López LM, Flores-Ibarra M, Bañuelos-Vargas I, Galaviz MA, True CD. Effect of fishmeal replacement by soy protein concentrate with taurine supplementation on growth performance, hematological and biochemical status, and liver histology of totoaba juveniles (Totoaba macdonaldi). Fish Physiol Biochem 2015; 41:921–936 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Zarei I, Brown DG, Nealon NJ, Ryan EP. Rice bran metabolome contains amino acids, vitamins & cofactors, and phytochemicals with medicinal and nutritional properties. Rice (N Y) 2017; 10:24 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hébert A, Forquin-Gomez MP, Roux A, Aubert J, Junot C et al. New insights into sulfur metabolism in yeasts as revealed by studies of Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013; 79:1200–1211 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gao YX, Xu B, Fan HR, Zhang MR, Zhang LJ et al. 1H NMR-based chemometric metabolomics characterization of soymilk fermented by Bacillus subtilis BSNK-5. Food Res Int 2020; 138:109686 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jacobsen JG, Smith LH. Biochemistry and physiology of taurine and taurine derivatives. Physiol Rev 1968; 48:424–511 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Tevatia R, Allen J, Rudrappa D, White D, Clemente TE et al. The taurine biosynthetic pathway of microalgae. Algal Res 2015; 9:21–26 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Agnello G, Chang LL, Lamb CM, Georgiou G, Stone EM. Discovery of a substrate selectivity motif in amino acid decarboxylases unveils a taurine biosynthesis pathway in prokaryotes. ACS Chem Biol 2013; 8:2264–2271 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Uria-Nickelsen MR, Leadbetter ER, Godchaux W III. Sulphonate utilization by enteric bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1993; 139:203–208 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Eichhorn E, Leisinger T. Escherichia coli utilizes methanesulfonate and L-cysteate as sole sulfur sources for growth. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2001; 205:271–275 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Nishikawa M, Shen L, Ogawa K. Taurine dioxygenase (tauD)-independent taurine assimilation in Escherichia coli. Microbiology 2018; 164:1446–1456 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. van der Ploeg JR, Weiss MA, Saller E, Nashimoto H, Saito N et al. Identification of sulfate starvation-regulated genes in Escherichia coli: a gene cluster involved in the utilization of taurine as a sulfur source. J Bacteriol 1996; 178:5438–5446 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nishikawa M, Noda S, Henmi K, Ogawa K. Sulphate repression of ssuD-dependent alkanesulphonate-sulphur assimilation in Escherichia coli. Microbiology 2022; 168: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rodríguez-Robles E, Müller D, Künzl T, Nemat SJ, Edelmann MP et al. Rational design of a bacterial import system for new-to-nature molecules. Metab Eng 2024; 85:26–34 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pardee AB, Prestidge LS, Whipple MB, Dreyfuss J. A binding site for sulfate and its relation to sulfate transport into Salmonella typhimurium. J Biol Chem 1966; 241:3962–3969 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ota N, Galsworthy PR, Pardee AB. Genetics of sulfate transport by Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol 1971; 105:1053–1062 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Schaaper RM, Dunn RL. Spontaneous mutation in the Escherichia coli lacI gene. Genetics 1991; 129:317–326 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Miller JH. Experiments in Molecular Genetics Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1972
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kataoka H, Yamamoto S, Makita M. Quantitative gas—liquid chromatography of taurine. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 1984; 306:61–68 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Tanaka Y, Yoshikaie K, Takeuchi A, Ichikawa M, Mori T et al. Crystal structure of a YeeE/YedE family protein engaged in thiosulfate uptake. Sci Adv 2020; 6:eaba7637 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Schirmer A, Kolter R. Computational analysis of bacterial sulfatases and their modifying enzymes. Chem Biol 1998; 5:R181–6 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Denger K, Weiss M, Felux AK, Schneider A, Mayer C et al. Sulphoglycolysis in Escherichia coli K-12 closes a gap in the biogeochemical sulphur cycle. Nature 2014; 507:114–117 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Edwards MD, Bartlett W, Booth IR. Pore mutations of the Escherichia coli MscS channel affect desensitization but not ionic preference. Biophys J 2008; 94:3003–3013 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Moller E, Britt M, Schams A, Cetuk H, Anishkin A et al. Mechanosensitive channel MscS is critical for termination of the bacterial hypoosmotic permeability response. J Gen Physiol 2023; 155:e202213168 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Luttermann T, Rückert C, Wibberg D, Busche T, Schwarzhans JP et al. Establishment of a near-contiguous genome sequence of the citric acid producing yeast Yarrowia lipolytica DSM 3286 with resolution of rDNA clusters and telomeres. NAR Genom Bioinform 2021; 3:lqab085 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Wu LT, Huang YH, Hsieh LS. Production of γ-aminobutyric acid by immobilization of two Yarrowia lipolytica glutamic acid decarboxylase on electrospun nanofibrous membrane. Int J Biol Macromol 2024; 278:135046 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Dujon B, Sherman D, Fischer G, Durrens P, Casaregola S et al. Genome evolution in yeasts. Nature 2004; 430:35–44 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Strausberg RL, Feingold EA, Grouse LH, Derge JG, Klausner RD et al. Generation and initial analysis of more than 15,000 full-length human and mouse cDNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99:16899–16903 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Magnan C, Yu J, Chang I, Jahn E, Kanomata Y et al. Sequence assembly of Yarrowia lipolytica strain W29/CLIB89 shows transposable element diversity. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0162363 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu J, Wei Y, Ma K, An J, Liu X et al. Mechanistically diverse pathways for sulfoquinovose degradation in bacteria. ACS Catal 2021; 11:14740–14750 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Sharma M, Lingford JP, Petricevic M, Snow AJD, Zhang Y et al. Oxidative desulfurization pathway for complete catabolism of sulfoquinovose by bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2116022119 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Li C, Edwards MD, Jeong H, Roth J, Booth IR. Identification of mutations that alter the gating of the Escherichia coli mechanosensitive channel protein, MscK. Mol Microbiol 2007; 64:560–574 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kroner GM, Wolfe MB, Freddolino L. Escherichia coli Lrp regulates one-third of the genome via direct, cooperative, and indirect routes. J Bacteriol 2019; 201:00411–00418 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Graham JE, Wilkinson BJ. Staphylococcus aureus osmoregulation: roles for choline, glycine betaine, proline, and taurine. J Bacteriol 1992; 174:2711–2716 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Aruoma OI, Halliwell B, Hoey BM, Butler J. The antioxidant action of taurine, hypotaurine and their metabolic precursors. Biochem J 1988; 256:251–255 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Grove RQ, Karpowicz SJ. Reaction of hypotaurine or taurine with superoxide produces the organic peroxysulfonic acid peroxytaurine. Free Radic Biol Med 2017; 108:575–584 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Gupta A, Imlay JA. How a natural antibiotic uses oxidative stress to kill oxidant-resistant bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023; 120:e2312110120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001620
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001620
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error