Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is a massive threat, but developing a new antibiotic can take decades. That time could be drastically reduced if we were able to anticipate desirable properties of a chemical, such as its potential to target specific bacterial compartments. This would provide the opportunity to prioritize the development of molecules that target, for instance, the cell membrane, as this does not rely on transporters and usually results in a fast-acting bactericidal effect. We used flow cytometry and a set of fluorophores together with a group of antibiotics to discriminate between antimicrobials acting on cell membrane versus intracellularly against two Gram-negative bacteria, and . We then chose Rhodamine 123 as a fluorescent marker to screen a commercial library of chemical compounds. Using flow cytometry, several drugs present in the Prestwick library were observed to have cytotoxic effects at 1 µM final concentration towards . This was confirmed with growth inhibitory assays in both and for pantoprazole, theophylline and zoledronic acid. This represents an approach to the large-scale screening of small molecules with the potential to deliver fast-acting molecules that target cell membranes in Gram-negative bacteria.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Novo Nordisk DK (Award NNF20CC0035580)
    • Principal Award Recipient: DouglasBruce Kell
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001619
2025-11-13
2025-12-16

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/171/11/mic001619.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001619&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Salcedo-Sora JE, Bruce Kell D. Rapid accumulation of fluorophores and fast kill identify drugs with bactericidal effects against Gram-negative bacteria Microbiology Society Figshare 2025 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kell DB. The transporter-mediated cellular uptake and efflux of pharmaceutical drugs and biotechnology products: how and why phospholipid bilayer transport is negligible in real biomembranes. Molecules 2021; 26:5629 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kell DB. What would be the observable consequences if phospholipid bilayer diffusion of drugs into cells is negligible?. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2015; 36:15–21 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bush K. Antimicrobial agents targeting bacterial cell walls and cell membranes. Rev Sci Tech 2012; 31:43–56 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. WHO 2021 Antibacterial Agents in Clinical and Preclinical Development: An Overview and Analysis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021
  6. WHO/EMP/IAU/ Antibacterial Agents in Preclinical Development. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019
  7. Theuretzbacher U, Outterson K, Engel A, Karlén A. The global preclinical antibacterial pipeline. Nat Rev Microbiol 2020; 18:275–285 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Steen HB. Flow cytometry of bacteria: glimpses from the past with a view to the future. J Microbiol Methods 2000; 42:65–74 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Davey HM, Kell DB. Flow cytometry and cell sorting of heterogeneous microbial populations: the importance of single-cell analyses. Microbiol Rev 1996; 60:641–696 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. López-Gálvez J, Schiessl K, Besmer MD, Bruckmann C, Harms H et al. Development of an automated online flow cytometry method to quantify cell density and fingerprint bacterial communities. Cells 2023; 12:1559 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Mao G, Wang Y, Hammes F. Automated flow cytometry as a flexible tool for comparing disinfection characteristics of indigenous bacterial communities and pure cultures. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2021; 225:112799 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Müller S, Davey H. Recent advances in the analysis of individual microbial cells. Cytometry A 2009; 75:83–85 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Van Nevel S, Koetzsch S, Proctor CR, Besmer MD, Prest EI et al. Flow cytometric bacterial cell counts challenge conventional heterotrophic plate counts for routine microbiological drinking water monitoring. Water Res 2017; 113:191–206 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jindal S, Yang L, Day PJ, Kell DB. Involvement of multiple influx and efflux transporters in the accumulation of cationic fluorescent dyes by Escherichia coli. BMC Microbiol 2019; 19:195 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Salcedo-Sora JE, Jindal S, O’Hagan S, Kell DB. A palette of fluorophores that are differentially accumulated by wild-type and mutant strains of Escherichia coli: surrogate ligands for profiling bacterial membrane transporters. Microbiology 2021; 167:001016 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. O’Hagan S, Kell DB. Structural similarities between some common fluorophores used in biology, marketed drugs, endogenous metabolites, and natural products. Mar Drugs 2020; 18:582 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Radi MS, Munro LJ, Salcedo-Sora JE, Kim SH, Feist AM et al. Understanding functional redundancy and promiscuity of multidrug transporters in E. coli under lipophilic cation stress. Membranes 2022; 12:1264 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Radi MS, SalcedoSora JE, Kim SH, Sudarsan S, Sastry AV et al. Membrane transporter identification and modulation via adaptive laboratory evolution. Metab Eng 2022; 72:376–390 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Davey HM, Jones A, Shaw AD, Kell DB. Variable selection and multivariate methods for the identification of microorganisms by flow cytometry. Cytometry 1999; 35:162–168 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Srinivasan B, Lloyd MD. Dose-response curves and the determination of IC(50) and EC(50) values. J Med Chem 2024; 67:17931–17934
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wurm M, Ilhan S, Jandt U, Zeng AP. Direct and highly sensitive measurement of fluorescent molecules in bulk solutions using flow cytometry. Anal Biochem 2019; 570:32–42 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kell DB, Ferguson SJ, John P. Measurement by a flow dialysis technique of the steady-state proton-motive force in chromatophores from Rhodospirillum rubrum. Comparison with phosphorylation potential. Biochim Biophys Acta 1978; 502:111–126 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Diaper JP, Tither K, Edwards C. Rapid assessment of bacterial viability by flow cytometry. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1992; 38:268–272 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lin TE. Py50: generate dose-response curves (v1.0.4) Zenodo 2024 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. S, Josse J, Husson F. FactoMineR: an r package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw 2008; 25:18 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. WHO Prioritization of Pathogens to Guide Discovery, Research and Development of New Antibiotics for Drug Resistant Bacteria Infections, Including Tuberculosis. Geneva: 2017
  27. Biggs BW, Bedore SR, Arvay E, Huang S, Subramanian H et al. Development of a genetic toolset for the highly engineerable and metabolically versatile Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:5169–5182 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jiang X, Palazzotto E, Wybraniec E, Munro LJ, Zhang H et al. Automating cloning by natural transformation. ACS Synth Biol 2020; 9:3228–3235 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Young DM, Parke D, Ornston LN. Opportunities for genetic investigation afforded by Acinetobacter baylyi, a nutritionally versatile bacterial species that is highly competent for natural transformation. Annu Rev Microbiol 2005; 59:519–551 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Stokes JM, MacNair CR, Ilyas B, French S, Côté J-P et al. Pentamidine sensitizes Gram-negative pathogens to antibiotics and overcomes acquired colistin resistance. Nat Microbiol 2017; 2:17028 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Boman HG, Eriksson KG. Penicillin-induced lysis in Escherichia coli. J Gen Microbiol 1963; 31:339–352 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sampson TR, Liu X, Schroeder MR, Kraft CS, Burd EM et al. Rapid killing of Acinetobacter baumannii by polymyxins is mediated by a hydroxyl radical death pathway. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56:5642–5649 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jerala R. Synthetic lipopeptides: a novel class of anti-infectives. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2007; 16:1159–1169 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lewis K. The science of antibiotic discovery. Cell 2020; 181:29–45 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Jangra M, Travin DY, Aleksandrova EV, Kaur M, Darwish L et al. A broad-spectrum lasso peptide antibiotic targeting the bacterial ribosome. Nature 2025; 640:1022–1030 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Stokes JM, Yang K, Swanson K, Jin W, Cubillos-Ruiz A et al. A deep learning approach to antibiotic discovery. Cell 2020; 180:688–702 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sati H, Carrara E, Savoldi A, Hansen P, Garlasco J et al. The WHO bacterial priority pathogens list 2024: a prioritisation study to guide research, development, and public health strategies against antimicrobial resistance. Lancet Infect Dis 2025; 25:1033–1043 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Berglund NA, Piggot TJ, Jefferies D, Sessions RB, Bond PJ et al. Interaction of the antimicrobial peptide polymyxin B1 with both membranes of E. coli: a molecular dynamics study. PLoS Comput Biol 2015; 11:e1004180 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Deris ZZ, Swarbrick JD, Roberts KD, Azad MAK, Akter J et al. Probing the penetration of antimicrobial polymyxin lipopeptides into gram-negative bacteria. Bioconjug Chem 2014; 25:750–760 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sabnis A, Hagart KL, Klöckner A, Becce M, Evans LE et al. Colistin kills bacteria by targeting lipopolysaccharide in the cytoplasmic membrane. eLife 2021; 10:e65836 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Buijs NP, Matheson EJ, Cochrane SA, Martin NI. Targeting membrane-bound bacterial cell wall precursors: a tried and true antibiotic strategy in nature and the clinic. Chem Commun 2023; 59:7685–7703 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Bialvaei AZ, Samadi Kafil H. Colistin, mechanisms and prevalence of resistance. Curr Med Res Opin 2015; 31:707–721 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. White TA, Kell DB. Comparative genomic assessment of novel broad-spectrum targets for antibacterial drugs. Comp Funct Genomics 2004; 5:304–327 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Piddock LJV. The 2019 Garrod Lecture: MDR efflux in Gram-negative bacteria-how understanding resistance led to a new tool for drug discovery. J Antimicrob Chemother 2019; 74:3128–3134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kell DB. Control of metabolite efflux in microbial cell factories: current advances and future prospects. In El-Mansi EMT, Nielsen J, Mousdale D, Allman T, Carlson R. eds Fermentation Microbiology and Biotechnology Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2019 pp 117–138
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Mendes P, Girardi E, Superti-Furga G, Kell DB. Why most transporter mutations that cause antibiotic resistance are to efflux pumps rather than to import transporters. bioRxiv 2020 [View Article] [Preprint]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Salgado J, Rayner J, Ojkic N. Advancing antibiotic discovery with bacterial cytological profiling: a high-throughput solution to antimicrobial resistance. Front Microbiol 2025; 16:1536131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Mermans F, De Baets H, García-Timermans C, Teughels W, Boon N. Unlocking the mechanism of action: a cost-effective flow cytometry approach for accelerating antimicrobial drug development. Microbiol Spectr 2024; 12:e0393123 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Foletto VS, da Rosa TF, Serafin MB, Bottega A, Hörner R. Repositioning of non-antibiotic drugs as an alternative to microbial resistance: a systematic review. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2021; 58:106380 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Zafar Gondal A, Zulfiqar H. Aminophylline. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2024
  51. Parsons ME. Pantoprazole, a new proton-pump inhibitor, has a precise and predictable profile of activity. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1996; 8 Suppl 1:S15–20 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Nakao M, Malfertheiner P. Growth inhibitory and bactericidal activities of lansoprazole compared with those of omeprazole and pantoprazole against Helicobacter pylori. Helicobacter 1998; 3:21–27 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Ni W, Cai X, Liang B, Cai Y, Cui J et al. Effect of proton pump inhibitors on activity of tigecycline against several common clinical pathogens. PLoS One 2014; 9:e86715 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Green JR. Bisphosphonates: preclinical review. Oncologist 2004; 9 Suppl 4:3–13 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Scala R, Maqoud F, McClenaghan C, Harter TM, Perrone MG et al. Zoledronic acid blocks overactive Kir6.1/SUR2-dependent KATP channels in skeletal muscle and osteoblasts in a murine model of Cantú syndrome. Cells 2023; 12:928 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Huang Y, Zhu Y, Yue H-Y, Liu Y-Y, Deng L-M et al. Flavomycin restores colistin susceptibility in multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. mSystems 2024; 9:e0010924 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Zgurskaya HI, Löpez CA, Gnanakaran S. Permeability barrier of gram-negative cell envelopes and approaches to bypass it. ACS Infect Dis 2015; 1:512–522 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001619
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001619
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Loading data from figshare Loading data from figshare
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error