Skip to content
1887

Abstract

a notable pathogen responsible for the life-threatening disease diphtheria, encounters harsh intracellular environments within the host, particularly within macrophages where acidic conditions prevail. To elucidate the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying its acid stress response, we employed a Transposon Directed Insertion-site Sequencing approach. This comprehensive study identified crucial genes and pathways facilitating ’s survival at low pH. In subsequent experiments, the Ktr potassium transport system was identified as a putative key factor for maintaining pH homeostasis and growth under acidic stress. A deletion strain exhibited significantly reduced growth at pH 5, which could be restored by expression in . The deletion strain showed unchanged uptake and survival in macrophages compared to the wild-type, indicating that the Ktr system is not crucial for the survival of in phagocytes. These findings advance our understanding of ’s pathophysiology, further delineating the intricate survival strategies of in hostile environments.

  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001554
2025-04-24
2026-03-13

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/171/4/mic001554.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001554&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ventura M, Canchaya C, Tauch A, Chandra G, Fitzgerald GF et al. Genomics of actinobacteria: tracing the evolutionary history of an ancient phylum. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2007; 71:495–548 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Burkovski A. Cell envelope of corynebacteria: structure and influence on pathogenicity. ISRN Microbiol 2013; 2013:935736 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. LPSN Genus Corynebacterium. n.d https://www.bacterio.net/archive/corynebacterium.html accessed 8 January 2025
  4. Sharma NC, Efstratiou A, Mokrousov I, Mutreja A, Das B et al. Diphtheria. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2019; 5:81 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Puliti M, von Hunolstein C, Marangi M, Bistoni F, Tissi L. Experimental model of infection with non-toxigenic strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae and development of septic arthritis. J Med Microbiol 2006; 55(pt 2):229–235 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Peixoto RS, Hacker E, Antunes CA, Weerasekera D, Dias AA et al. Pathogenic properties of a Corynebacterium diphtheriae strain isolated from a case of osteomyelitis. J Med Microbiol 2016; 65:1311–1321 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Antunes CA, Sanches dos Santos L, Hacker E, Köhler S, Bösl K et al. Characterization of DIP0733, a multi-functional virulence factor of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Microbiology 2015; 161:639–647 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Weerasekera D, Stengel F, Sticht H, de Mattos Guaraldi AL, Burkovski A et al. The C-terminal coiled-coil domain of Corynebacterium diphtheriae DIP0733 is crucial for interaction with epithelial cells and pathogenicity in invertebrate animal model systems. BMC Microbiol 2018; 18:106 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Peixoto RS, Antunes CA, Lourêdo LS, Viana VG, Santos CSD et al. Functional characterization of the collagen-binding protein DIP2093 and its influence on host-pathogen interaction and arthritogenic potential of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Microbiology 2017; 163:692–701 Epub 2017 May 24 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Rogers EA, Das A, Ton-That H. Adhesion by pathogenic corynebacteria. Adv Exp Med Biol 2011; 715:91–103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sangal V, Burkovski A. Insights into old and new enemies: pan-genomics of Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans. In Barh D, Soares S, Tiwari S, Azevedo VA. eds Pan-Genomics: Overview, Challenges, and Future Prospects London, United Kingdom: Academic Press; 2010
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sheldon JR, Heinrichs DE. Recent developments in understanding the iron acquisition strategies of gram positive pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2015; 39:592–630 Epub 2015 Apr 9 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Parveen S, Bishai WR, Murphy JR. Corynebacterium diphtheriae: diphtheria toxin, the tox operon, and its regulation by Fe2+ activation of apo-DtxR. Microbiol Spectr 2019; 7: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Weerasekera D, Möller J, Kraner ME, Azevedo Antunes C, Mattos-Guaraldi AL et al. Beyond diphtheria toxin: cytotoxic proteins of Corynebacterium ulcerans and Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Microbiology 2019; 165:876–890 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ott L, Hacker E, Kunert T, Karrington I, Etschel P et al. Analysis of Corynebacterium diphtheriae macrophage interaction: dispensability of corynomycolic acids for inhibition of phagolysosome maturation and identification of a new gene involved in synthesis of the corynomycolic acid layer. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0180105 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Weerasekera D, Hahn J, Herrmann M, Burkovski A. Induction of necrosis in human macrophage cell lines by Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans strains isolated from fatal cases of systemic infections. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:4109 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. dos Santos CS, dos Santos LS, de Souza MC, dos Santos Dourado F, de Souza de Oliveira Dias AA et al. Non-opsonic phagocytosis of homologous non-toxigenic and toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae strains by human U-937 macrophages. Microbiol Immunol 2010; 54:1–10 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ott L, Möller J, Burkovski A. Interactions between the re-emerging pathogen Corynebacterium diphtheriae and host cells. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:3298 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tauch A, Burkovski A. Molecular armory or niche factors: virulence determinants of Corynebacterium species. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2015; 362:fnv185 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Goodall ECA, Azevedo Antunes C, Möller J, Sangal V, Torres VVL et al. A multiomic approach to defining the essential genome of the globally important pathogen Corynebacterium diphtheriae. PLoS Genet 2023; 19:e1010737 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Azevedo Antunes C, Richardson EJ, Quick J, Fuentes-Utrilla P, Isom GL et al. Complete closed genome sequence of nontoxigenic invasive Corynebacterium diphtheriae bv. mitis strain ISS 3319. Genome Announc 2018; 6:e01566-17 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Barquist L, Mayho M, Cummins C, Cain AK, Boinett CJ et al. The TraDIS toolkit: sequencing and analysis for dense transposon mutant libraries. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:1109–1111 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Okibe N, Suzuki N, Inui M, Yukawa H. Efficient markerless gene replacement in Corynebacterium glutamicum using a new temperature-sensitive plasmid. J Microbiol Methods 2011; 85:155–163 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Horstmann N, Seidel G, Aung-Hilbrich LM, Hillen W. Residues His-15 and Arg-17 of HPr participate differently in catabolite signal processing via CcpA. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:1175–1182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Malhotra V, Arteaga-Cortés LT, Clay G, Clark-Curtiss JE. Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein kinase K confers survival advantage during early infection in mice and regulates growth in culture and during persistent infection: implications for immune modulation. Microbiology 2010; 156:2829–2841 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Rieck B, Degiacomi G, Zimmermann M, Cascioferro A, Boldrin F et al. PknG senses amino acid availability to control metabolism and virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog 2017; 13:e1006399 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen D, Ma S, He L, Yuan P, She Z et al. Sclerotiorin inhibits protein kinase G from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and impairs mycobacterial growth in macrophages. Tuberculosis 2017; 103:37–43 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang J, Ge P, Lei Z, Lu Z, Qiang L et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein kinase G acts as an unusual ubiquitinating enzyme to impair host immunity. EMBO Rep 2021; 22:e52175 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ge P, Lei Z, Yu Y, Lu Z, Qiang L et al. M. tuberculosis PknG manipulates host autophagy flux to promote pathogen intracellular survival. Autophagy 2022; 18:576–594 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Oliveira FM de, Procopio VO, de Lima Menezes G, Silva RA da, Kipnis A et al. Mycobacterium bovis PknG R242P mutation results in structural changes with enhanced virulence in the mouse model of infection. Microorganisms 2022; 10:673 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Paroha R, Chourasia R, Mondal R, Chaurasiya SK. PknG supports mycobacterial adaptation in acidic environment. Mol Cell Biochem 2018; 443:69–80 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Diskowski M, Mehdipour AR, Wunnicke D, Mills DJ, Mikusevic V et al. Helical jackknives control the gates of the double-pore K+ uptake system KtrAB. elife 2017; 6:e24303 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Heller D, Hernández-Plaza A, Forslund SK et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:D309–D314 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Vieira-Pires RS, Szollosi A, Morais-Cabral JH. The structure of the KtrAB potassium transporter. Nature 2013; 496:323–328 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ochrombel I, Ott L, Krämer R, Burkovski A, Marin K. Impact of improved potassium accumulation on pH homeostasis, membrane potential adjustment and survival of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011; 1807:444–450 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Follmann M, Becker M, Ochrombel I, Ott V, Krämer R et al. Potassium transport in Corynebacterium glutamicum is facilitated by the putative channel protein CglK, which is essential for pH homeostasis and growth at acidic pH. J Bacteriol 2009; 191:2944–2952 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Zahrt TC, Deretic V. Mycobacterium tuberculosis signal transduction system required for persistent infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:12706–12711 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pang X, Vu P, Byrd TF, Ghanny S, Soteropoulos P et al. Evidence for complex interactions of stress-associated regulons in an mprAB deletion mutant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiology 2007; 153:1229–1242 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tiwari A, Balázsi G, Gennaro ML, Igoshin OA. The interplay of multiple feedback loops with post-translational kinetics results in bistability of mycobacterial stress response. Phys Biol 2010; 7:036005 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sanyal S, Banerjee SK, Banerjee R, Mukhopadhyay J, Kundu M. Polyphosphate kinase 1, a central node in the stress response network of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, connects the two-component systems MprAB and SenX3-RegX3 and the extracytoplasmic function sigma factor, sigma E. Microbiology 2013; 159:2074–2086 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Grant SG, Jessee J, Bloom FR, Hanahan D. Differential plasmid rescue from transgenic mouse DNAs into Escherichia coli methylation-restriction mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4645–4649 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Hoffelder M, Raasch K, van Ooyen J, Eggeling L. The E2 domain of OdhA of Corynebacterium glutamicum has succinyltransferase activity dependent on lipoyl residues of the acetyltransferase AceF. J Bacteriol 2010; 192:5203–5211 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001554
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001554
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Supplementary material 2

EXCEL

Supplementary material 3

EXCEL
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error