Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) caused by bacteria of the complex remains one of the most important infectious diseases of mankind. Rifampicin is a first line drug used in multi-drug treatment of TB, however, the necessary duration of treatment with these drugs is long and development of resistance is an increasing impediment to treatment programmes. As a result, there is a requirement for research and development of new TB drugs, which can form the basis of new drug combinations, either due to their own anti-mycobacterial activity or by augmenting the activity of existing drugs such as rifampicin. This study describes a TnSeq analysis to identify mutants with enhanced sensitivity to sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of rifampicin. The rifampicin-sensitive mutants were disrupted in genes of a variety of functions and the majority fitted into three thematic groups: firstly, genes that were involved in DNA/RNA metabolism, secondly, genes involved in sensing and regulating mycobacterial cellular systems, and thirdly, genes involved in the synthesis and maintenance of the cell wall. Selection at two concentrations of rifampicin (1/250 and 1/62 MIC) demonstrated a dose response for mutants with statistically significant sensitivity to rifampicin. The dataset reveals mechanisms of how mycobacteria are innately tolerant to and initiate an adaptive response to rifampicin; providing putative targets for the development of adjunctive therapies that potentiate the action of rifampicin.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Award BB/W016613/1)
    • Principal Award Recipient: GrahamR. Stewart
  • Commonwealth Scholarship Commission (Award FJCS-2018-138)
    • Principal Award Recipient: PoojaChand
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001488
2024-08-16
2025-12-13

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/170/8/mic001488.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001488&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Campbell EA, Korzheva N, Mustaev A, Murakami K, Nair S et al. Structural mechanism for rifampicin inhibition of bacterial RNA polymerase. Cell 2001; 104:901–912 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. WHO World health organization model list of essential medicines for children. In Mental and Holistic Health 2019
    [Google Scholar]
  3. World Health Organization Annual Report of Tuberculosis. Annual Global TB Report of WHO; 2022 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240061729
  4. Cokol M, Kuru N, Bicak E, Larkins-Ford J, Aldridge BB. Efficient measurement and factorization of high-order drug interactions in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sci Adv 2017; 3:e1701881 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ramón-García S, Ng C, Anderson H, Chao JD, Zheng X et al. Synergistic drug combinations for tuberculosis therapy identified by a novel high-throughput screen. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55:3861–3869 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruhn DF, Scherman MS, Liu J, Scherbakov D, Meibohm B et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of synergism between anti-tubercular spectinamides and non-classical tuberculosis antibiotics. Sci Rep 2015; 5:13985 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Yilancioglu K, Cokol M. Design of high-order antibiotic combinations against M. tuberculosis by ranking and exclusion. Sci Rep 2019; 9:11876 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sassetti CM, Rubin EJ. Genetic requirements for mycobacterial survival during infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100:12989–12994 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Griffin JE, Gawronski JD, Dejesus MA, Ioerger TR, Akerley BJ et al. High-resolution phenotypic profiling defines genes essential for mycobacterial growth and cholesterol catabolism. PLoS Pathog 2011; 7:e1002251 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dejesus MA, Gerrick ER, Xu W, Park SW, Long JE et al. Comprehensive essentiality analysis of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome via saturating transposon mutagenesis. mBio 2017; 8:1–17 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Xu W, DeJesus MA, Rücker N, Engelhart CA, Wright MG et al. Chemical genetic interaction profiling reveals determinants of intrinsic antibiotic resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017; 61:e01334-17 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bellerose MM, Proulx MK, Smith CM, Baker RE, Ioerger TR et al. Distinct bacterial pathways influence the efficacy of antibiotics against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. mSystems 2020; 5:e00396-20 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Li S, Poulton NC, Chang JS, Azadian ZA, DeJesus MA et al. CRISPRi chemical genetics and comparative genomics identify genes mediating drug potency in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Microbiol 2022; 7:766–779 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mendum TA, Chandran A, Williams K, Vordermeier HM, Villarreal-Ramos B et al. Transposon libraries identify novel Mycobacterium bovis BCG genes involved in the dynamic interactions required for BCG to persist during in vivo passage in cattle. BMC Genomics 2019; 20:431 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mendum TA, Wu H, Kierzek AM, Stewart GR. Lipid metabolism and type VII secretion systems dominate the genome scale virulence profile of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in human dendritic cells. BMC Genomics 2015; 16:372 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith AA, Villarreal-Ramos B, Mendum TA, Williams KJ, Jones GJ et al. Genetic screening for the protective antigenic targets of BCG vaccination. Tuberculosis 2020; 124:101979 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. DeJesus MA, Ambadipudi C, Baker R, Sassetti C, Ioerger TR et al. TRANSIT--a software tool for Himar1 TnSeq analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 2015; 11:e1004401 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Meneguello JE, Arita GS, Silva JV de O, Ghiraldi-Lopes LD, Caleffi-Ferracioli KR et al. Insight about cell wall remodulation triggered by rifampicin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 2020; 120:101903 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Block AM, Namugenyi SB, Palani NP, Brokaw AM, Zhang L et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis requires the outer membrane lipid phthiocerol dimycocerosate for starvation-induced antibiotic tolerance. Microbiology 2023 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Boutte CC, Baer CE, Papavinasasundaram K, Liu W, Chase MR et al. A cytoplasmic peptidoglycan amidase homologue controls mycobacterial cell wall synthesis. elife 2016; 5:e14590 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang M, Guo X, Yang X, Zhang B, Ren J et al. Mycobacterial dynamin-like protein IniA mediates membrane fission. Nat Commun 2019; 10: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. da Silva PEA, Von Groll A, Martin A, Palomino JC. Efflux as a mechanism for drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2011; 63:1–9 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. de Oliveira MCB, Balan A. The atp-binding cassette (Abc) transport systems in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: structure, function, and possible targets for therapeutics. Biology 2020; 9:443 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kapopoulou A, Lew JM, Cole ST. The MycoBrowser portal: a comprehensive and manually annotated resource for mycobacterial genomes. Tuberculosis 2011; 91:8–13 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jain SK, Paul-Satyaseela M, Lamichhane G, Kim KS, Bishai WR. Mycobacterium tuberculosis invasion and traversal across an in vitro human blood-brain barrier as a pathogenic mechanism for central nervous system tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 2006; 193:1287–1295 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Rosas-Magallanes V, Stadthagen-Gomez G, Rauzier J, Barreiro LB, Tailleux L et al. Signature-tagged transposon mutagenesis identifies novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis genes involved in the parasitism of human macrophages. Infect Immun 2007; 75:504–507 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Li Q, Peng Z, Fu X, Wang H, Zhao Z et al. Rv3737 is required for Mycobacterium tuberculosis growth in vitro and in vivo and correlates with bacterial load and disease severity in human tuberculosis. BMC Infect Dis 2022; 22:256 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wolff KA, Nguyen HT, Cartabuke RH, Singh A, Ogwang S et al. Protein kinase G is required for intrinsic antibiotic resistance in mycobacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53:3515–3519 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ventura M, Rieck B, Boldrin F, Degiacomi G, Bellinzoni M et al. GarA is an essential regulator of metabolism in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. . Mol Microbiol 2013; 90:356–366 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kumar D, Narayanan S. PknE, a serine/threonine kinase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis modulates multiple apoptotic paradigms. Infect Genet Evol 2012; 12:737–747 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Jayakumar D, Jacobs WR, Narayanan S. Protein kinase E of Mycobacterium tuberculosis has a role in the nitric oxide stress response and apoptosis in a human macrophage model of infection. Cell Microbiol 2008; 10:365–374 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Wehenkel A, Bellinzoni M, Graña M, Duran R, Villarino A et al. Mycobacterial Ser/Thr protein kinases and phosphatases: physiological roles and therapeutic potential. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics 2008; 1784:193–202 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Recchi C, Sclavi B, Rauzier J, Gicquel B, Reyrat JM. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv1395 is a class III transcriptional regulator of the AraC family involved in cytochrome P450 regulation. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:33763–33773 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Al-Zubaidi A, Cheung CY, Cook GM, Taiaroa G, Valerie Mizrahi JSL et al. RNase HI depletion strongly potentiates cell killing by rifampicin in mycobacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2022
    [Google Scholar]
  35. McClure WR, Cech CL. On the mechanism of rifampicin inhibition of RNA synthesis. J Biol Chem 1978; 253:8949–8956 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kessler C, Hartmann GR. The two effects of rifampicin on the RNA polymerase reaction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1977; 74:50–56 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Zaw MT, Emran NA, Lin Z. Mutations inside rifampicin-resistance determining region of rpoB gene associated with rifampicin-resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Infect Public Health 2018; 11:605–610 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Louw GE, Warren RM, Gey van Pittius NC, Leon R, Jimenez A et al. Rifampicin reduces susceptibility to ofloxacin in rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis through efflux. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 184:269–276 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Nandakumar M, Nathan C, Rhee KY. Isocitrate lyase mediates broad antibiotic tolerance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. . Nat Commun 2014; 5:4306 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhu JH, Wang BW, Pan M, Zeng YN, Rego H et al. Rifampicin can induce antibiotic tolerance in mycobacteria via paradoxical changes in rpoB transcription. Nat Commun 2018; 9:4218 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Colangeli R, Helb D, Sridharan S, Sun J, Varma-Basil M et al. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis iniA gene is essential for activity of an efflux pump that confers drug tolerance to both isoniazid and ethambutol. Mol Microbiol 2005; 55:1829–1840 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Becq J, Gutierrez MC, Rosas-Magallanes V, Rauzier J, Gicquel B et al. Contribution of horizontally acquired genomic islands to the evolution of the tubercle bacilli. Mol Biol Evol 2007; 24:1861–1871 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang Y, Fu H, Shi X-J, Zhao G-P, Lyu L-D. Genome-wide screen reveals cellular functions that counteract rifampicin lethality in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Spectr 2024; 12: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Chao L. Sensitivity of DNA-repair-deficient strains of Escherichia coli to rifampicin killing. Mutat Res Lett 1986; 173:25–29 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Balbontín R, Frazão N, Gordo I. DNA breaks-mediated fitness cost reveals RNase HI as a new target for selectively eliminating antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3220–3234 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Traithan A, Tongtawe P, Thanongsaksrikul J, Voravuthikunchai S, Srimanote P. Antibacterial mechanism of rhodomyrtone involves the disruption of nucleoid segregation checkpoint in Streptococcus suis. AMB Express 2020; 10:110 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Dworkin J, Losick R. Does RNA polymerase help drive chromosome segregation in bacteria?. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99:14089–14094 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Kjos M, Veening JW. Tracking of chromosome dynamics in live Streptococcus pneumoniae reveals that transcription promotes chromosome segregation. Mol Microbiol 2014; 91:1088–1105 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Bosserman RE, Champion PA. Esx systems and the mycobacterial cell envelope: what’s the connection?. J Bacteriol 2017; 199:00131-17 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001488
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001488
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

EXCEL
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error