Skip to content
1887

Abstract

The emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens are a critical public health concern across the globe. Mobile genetic elements (MGEs) play an important role in the horizontal acquisition of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in bacteria. In this study, we have decoded the whole genome sequences of multidrug-resistant clinical isolates carrying the ARG-linked SXT, an integrative and conjugative element, in their large chromosomes. As in others, the SXT element has been found integrated into the 5′-end of the gene (which encodes peptide chain release factor 3 involved in translational regulation) on the large chromosome of non-O1/non-O139 strains. Further, we demonstrate the functionality of SXT-linked and genes, which confer resistance to chloramphenicol and streptomycin, respectively. The gene-encoded protein FloR belongs to the major facilitator superfamily efflux transporter containing 12 transmembrane domains (TMDs). Deletion analysis confirmed that even a single TMD of FloR is critical for the export function of chloramphenicol. The gene has two putative promoters, P1 and P2. Sequential deletions reveal that P2 is responsible for the expression of the . Deletion analysis of the N- and/or C-terminal coding regions of established their importance for conferring resistance against streptomycin. Interestingly, qPCR analysis of the and genes indicated that both of the genes are constitutively expressed in cells. Further, whole genome-based global phylogeography confirmed the presence of the integrative and conjugative element SXT in non-O1/non-O139 strains despite being non-multidrug resistant by lacking antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene cassettes, which needs monitoring.

Keyword(s): antibiotic resistance , cholera , genome and SXT
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (Award No.102/IFD/SAN/5603/2018-2019)
    • Principle Award Recipient: BhabatoshDas
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001424
2024-01-05
2025-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/170/1/mic001424.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001424&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Shimada T, Arakawa E, Itoh K, Okitsu T, Matsushima A et al. Extended serotyping scheme for Vibrio cholerae. Curr Microbiol 1994; 28:175–178 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kaper JB, Morris JG, Levine MM. Cholera. Clin Microbiol Rev 1995; 8:48–86 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Waldor MK, Tschäpe H, Mekalanos JJ. A new type of conjugative transposon encodes resistance to sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, and streptomycin in Vibrio cholerae O139. J Bacteriol 1996; 178:4157–4165 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Burrus V, Marrero J, Waldor MK. The current ICE age: biology and evolution of SXT-related integrating conjugative elements. Plasmid 2006; 55:173–183 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Levy SB. Active efflux, a common mechanism for biocide and antibiotic resistance. J Appl Microbiol 2002; 92 Suppl:65S–71S [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mukherjee M, Kakarla P, Kumar S, Gonzalez E, Floyd JT et al. Comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-O1 versus toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae. Genomics Discov 2014; 2:1 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Mathur J, Davis BM, Waldor MK. Antimicrobial peptides activate the Vibrio cholerae sigmaE regulon through an OmpU-dependent signalling pathway. Mol Microbiol 2007; 63:848–858 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bina XR, Provenzano D, Nguyen N, Bina JE. Vibrio cholerae RND family efflux systems are required for antimicrobial resistance, optimal virulence factor production, and colonization of the infant mouse small intestine. Infect Immun 2008; 76:3595–3605 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hochhut B, Beaber JW, Woodgate R, Waldor MK. Formation of chromosomal tandem arrays of the SXT element and R391, two conjugative chromosomally integrating elements that share an attachment site. J Bacteriol 2001; 183:1124–1132 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hochhut B, Waldor MK. Site-specific integration of the conjugal Vibrio cholerae SXT element into prfC. Mol Microbiol 1999; 32:99–110 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Barbieri JT, Khetawat G, Bhadra RK, Nandi S, Das J. Resurgent Vibrio cholerae O139: rearrangement of cholera toxin genetic elements and amplification of rrn operon. Infect Immun 1999; 67:148–154 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ramamurthy T, Pragasam AK, Taylor-Brown A, Will RC, Vasudevan K et al. Vibrio cholerae O139 genomes provide a clue to why it may have failed to usher in the eighth cholera pandemic. Nat Commun 2022; 13:3864 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Li P, Zhu T, Zhou D, Lu W, Liu H et al. Analysis of resistance to florfenicol and the related mechanism of dissemination in different animal-derived bacteria. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2020; 10:369 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Syriopoulou VP, Harding AL, Goldmann DA, Smith AL. In vitro antibacterial activity of fluorinated analogs of chloramphenicol and thiamphenicol. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1981; 19:294–297 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Arcangioli MA, Leroy-Sétrin S, Martel JL, Chaslus-Dancla E. A new chloramphenicol and florfenicol resistance gene flanked by two integron structures in Salmonella typhimurium DT104. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1999; 174:327–332 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Cloeckaert A, Schwarz S. Molecular characterization, spread and evolution of multidrug resistance in Salmonella enterica typhimurium DT104. Vet Res 2001; 32:301–310 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Blickwede M, Valentin-Weigand P, Schwarz S. Subinhibitory concentrations of florfenicol enhance the adherence of florfenicol-susceptible and florfenicol-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004; 54:286–288 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Li X-Z, Nikaido H. Efflux-mediated drug resistance in bacteria. Drugs 2004; 64:159–204 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Li Y, Li Y, Fernandez Crespo R, Leanse LG, Langford PR et al. Characterization of the Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae SXT-related integrative and conjugative element ICEApl2 and analysis of the encoded FloR protein: hydrophobic residues in transmembrane domains contribute dynamically to florfenicol and chloramphenicol efflux. J AntimicrobChemother 2018; 73:57–65 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Schwarz S, Kehrenberg C, Doublet B, Cloeckaert A. Molecular basis of bacterial resistance to chloramphenicol and florfenicol. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2004; 28:519–542 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Braibant M, Chevalier J, Chaslus-Dancla E, Pagès J-M, Cloeckaert A. Structural and functional study of the phenicol-specific efflux pump FloR belonging to the major facilitator superfamily. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49:2965–2971 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sjölund-Karlsson M, Reimer A, Folster JP, Walker M, Dahourou GA et al. Drug-resistance mechanisms in Vibrio cholerae O1 outbreak strain, Haiti, 2010. Emerg Infect Dis 2011; 17:2151–2154 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG. Current Protocol in Molecular Biology NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1989
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Das B, Bhadra RK. Molecular characterization of Vibrio cholerae DeltarelA DeltaspoT double mutants. Arch Microbiol 2008; 189:227–238 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Basu P, Bhadra RK. Post-transcriptional regulation of cholera toxin production in Vibrio cholerae by the stringent response regulator DksA. Microbiology 2019; 165:102–112 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Basu P, Pal RR, Dasgupta S, Bhadra RK. DksA-HapR-RpoS axis regulates haemagglutinin protease production in Vibrio cholerae. Microbiology 2017; 163:900–910 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pal RR, Bag S, Dasgupta S, Das B, Bhadra RK. Functional characterization of the stringent response regulatory gene dksA of Vibrio cholerae and its role in modulation of virulence phenotypes. J Bacteriol 2012; 194:5638–5648 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Shah S, Das B, Bhadra RK. Functional analysis of the essential GTP-binding-protein-coding gene cgtA of Vibrio cholerae. J Bacteriol 2008; 190:4764–4771 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mehrotra T, Devi TB, Kumar S, Talukdar D, Karmakar SP et al. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence in Helicobacter pylori: genomic insights. Genomics 2021; 113:3951–3966 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tonkin-Hill G, MacAlasdair N, Ruis C, Weimann A, Horesh G et al. Producing polished prokaryotic pangenomes with the Panaroo pipeline. Genome Biol 2020; 21:180 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:1312–1313 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:W256–W259 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Seemann T. Snippy: rapid haploid variant calling and core SNP phylogeny. GitHub; 2015 https://github.com/tseemann/snippy
  36. Bhanumathi R, Sabeena F, Isac SR, Shukla BN, Singh DV. Molecular characterization of Vibrio cholerae O139 bengal isolated from water and the aquatic plant Eichhornia crassipes in the River Ganga, Varanasi, India. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003; 69:2389–2394 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ramachandran D, Bhanumathi R, Singh DV. Multiplex PCR for detection of antibiotic resistance genes and the SXT element: application in the characterization of Vibrio cholerae. J Med Microbiol 2007; 56:346–351 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang R, Yu D, Yue J, Kan B. Variations in SXT elements in epidemic Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor strains in China. Sci Rep 2016; 6:22733 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Marin MA, Fonseca EL, Andrade BN, Cabral AC, Vicente ACP. Worldwide occurrence of integrative conjugative element encoding multidrug resistance determinants in epidemic Vibrio cholerae O1. PLoS One 2014; 9:e108728 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Mohapatra H, Mohapatra SS, Mantri CK, Colwell RR, Singh DV. Vibrio cholerae non-O1, non-O139 strains isolated before 1992 from Varanasi, India are multiple drug resistant, contain intSXT, dfr18 and aadA5 genes. Environ Microbiol 2008; 10:866–873 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Carraro N, Rivard N, Ceccarelli D, Colwell RR, Burrus V et al. IncA/C conjugative plasmids mobilize a new family of multidrug resistance islands in clinical Vibrio cholerae non-O1/Non-O139 isolates from Haiti. mBio 2016; 7:e00509–16 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Rubens CE, McNeill WF, Farrar WE. Transposable plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid sequence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa which mediates resistance to gentamicin and four other antimicrobial agents. J Bacteriol 1979; 139:877–882 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Beaber JW, Burrus V, Hochhut B, Waldor MK. Comparison of SXT and R391, two conjugative integrating elements: definition of a genetic backbone for the mobilization of resistance determinants. Cell Mol Life Sci 2002; 59:2065–2070 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. George AM, Hall RM. Efflux of chloramphenicol by the CmlA1 protein. FEMSMicrobiolLett 2002; 209:209–213 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kiiru JN, Saidi SM, Goddeeris BM, Wamae NC, Butaye P et al. Molecular characterisation of Vibrio cholerae O1 strains carrying an SXT/R391-like element from cholera outbreaks in Kenya: 1994-2007. BMC Microbiol 2009; 9:275 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Siriphap A, Leekitcharoenphon P, Kaas RS, Theethakaew C, Aarestrup FM et al. Characterization and genetic variation of Vibrio cholerae isolated from clinical and environmental sources in Thailand. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0169324 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Das B, Pal RR, Bag S, Bhadra RK. Stringent response in Vibrio cholerae: genetic analysis of spoT gene function and identification of a novel (p)ppGpp synthetase gene. Mol Microbiol 2009; 72:380–398 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Haralalka S, Nandi S, Bhadra RK. Mutation in the relA gene of Vibrio cholerae affects in vitro and in vivo expression of virulence factors. J Bacteriol 2003; 185:4672–4682 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Pugliese N, Maimone F, Scrascia M, Materu SF, Pazzani C. SXT-related integrating conjugative element and IncC plasmids in Vibrio cholerae O1 strains in Eastern Africa. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009; 63:438–442 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001424
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001424
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

EXCEL
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error