Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Microbiomes are major determinants of host growth, development and survival. In amphibians, host-associated bacteria in the skin can inhibit pathogen infection, but many processes can influence the structure and composition of the community. Here we quantified the shifts in skin-associated bacteria across developmental stages in the striped newt (), a threatened salamander species with a complex life history and vulnerable to infection by the amphibian chytrid fungus and ranavirus. Our analyses show that pre-metamorphic larval and paedomorphic stages share similar bacterial compositions, and that the changes in the microbiome coincided with physiological restructuring during metamorphosis. Newts undergoing metamorphosis exhibited microbiome compositions that were intermediate between paedomorphic and post-metamorphic stages, further supporting the idea that metamorphosis is a major driver of host-associated microbes in amphibians. We did not find support for infection-related disruption of the microbiome, though infection replicates were small for each respective life stage.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Science Foundation (Award IOS-2011278)
    • Principle Award Recipient: AnaV. Longo
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001399
2023-10-10
2025-03-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/169/10/mic001399.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001399&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Hooper LV, Macpherson AJ. Immune adaptations that maintain homeostasis with the intestinal microbiota. Nat Rev Immunol 2010; 10:159–169 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kueneman JG, Woodhams DC, Van Treuren W, Archer HM, Knight R et al. Inhibitory bacteria reduce fungi on early life stages of endangered Colorado boreal toads (Anaxyrus boreas). ISME J 2016; 10:934–944 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hill AJ, Leys JE, Bryan D, Erdman FM, Malone KS et al. Common cutaneous bacteria isolated from snakes inhibit growth of Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola. EcoHealth 2018; 15:109–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ross AA, Rodrigues Hoffmann A, Neufeld JD. The skin microbiome of vertebrates. Microbiome 2019; 7:79 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Nava-González B, Suazo-Ortuño I, López PB, Maldonado-López Y, Lopez-Toledo L et al. Inhibition of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection by skin bacterial communities in wild amphibian populations. Microb Ecol 2021; 82:666–676 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lauer A, Simon MA, Banning JL, André E, Duncan K et al. Common cutaneous bacteria from the eastern red-backed salamander can inhibit pathogenic fungi. Copeia 2007; 2007:630–640 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Flechas SV, Sarmiento C, Cárdenas ME, Medina EM, Restrepo S et al. Surviving chytridiomycosis: differential anti-Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis activity in bacterial isolates from three lowland species of Atelopus. PLoS One 2012; 7:e44832 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Colombo BM, Scalvenzi T, Benlamara S, Pollet N. Microbiota and mucosal immunity in amphibians. Front Immunol 2015; 6:1–15 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Becker MH, Walke JB, Cikanek S, Savage AE, Mattheus N et al. Composition of symbiotic bacteria predicts survival in Panamanian golden frogs infected with a lethal fungus. Proc Biol Sci 2015; 282:20142881 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Douglas AJ, Hug LA, Katzenback BA. Composition of the North American wood frog (Rana sylvatica) bacterial skin microbiome and seasonal variation in community structure. Microb Ecol 2021; 81:78–92 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Griffiths SM, Harrison XA, Weldon C, Wood MD, Pretorius A et al. Genetic variability and ontogeny predict microbiome structure in a disease-challenged montane amphibian. ISME J 2018; 12:2506–2517 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kohl KD, Cary TL, Karasov WH, Dearing MD. Restructuring of the amphibian gut microbiota through metamorphosis. Environ Microbiol Rep 2013; 5:899–903 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bataille A, Lee-Cruz L, Tripathi B, Waldman B. Skin bacterial community reorganization following metamorphosis of the fire-bellied toad (Bombina orientalis). Microb Ecol 2018; 75:505–514 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang H, Liu R, Meng J, Wang H. Changes in intestinal microbial community of Rana chensinensis tadpoles during metamorphosis. Aquaculture 2020; 516:734606 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fontaine SS, Mineo PM, Kohl KD. Changes in the gut microbial community of the eastern newt (Notophthalmus viridescens) across its three distinct life stages. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2021; 97:fiab021 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Martínez-Ugalde E, Ávila-Akerberg V, González Martínez TM, Vázquez Trejo M, Zavala Hernández D et al. The skin microbiota of the axolotl Ambystoma altamirani is highly influenced by metamorphosis and seasonality but not by pathogen infection. Anim Microbiome 2022; 4:63 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Rollins-Smith LA. Metamorphosis and the amphibian immune system. Immunol Rev 1998; 166:221–230 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Brown DD, Cai L. Amphibian metamorphosis. Dev Biol 2007; 306:20–33 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hernández-Gómez O, Hua J. From the organismal to biosphere levels: environmental impacts on the amphibian microbiota. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2023; 47:fuad002 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Duellman WE, Trueb L. Biology of Amphibians JHU Press; 1994 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Whiteman HH. Evolution of facultative paedomorphosis in salamanders. Q Rev Biol 1994; 69:205–221 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Wiens JJ, Bonett RM, Chippindale PT, Anderson F (Andy). Ontogeny discombobulates phylogeny: paedomorphosis and higher-level salamander relationships. Syst Biol 2005; 54:91–110 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Fox H. Changes in amphibian skin during larval development and metamorphosis. Metamorphosis 198559–87
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ohmura H, Wakahara M. Transformation of skin from larval to adult types in normally metamorphosing and metamorphosis-arrested salamander, Hynobius retardatus. Differentiation 1998; 63:237–246 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Johnson CK, Voss SR. Chapter Eight -Salamander paedomorphosis: linking thyroid hormone to life history and life cycle evolution. In Shi Y-B. eds Current Topics in Developmental Biology vol 103 Academic Press; 2013 pp 229–258 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Haislip NA, Gray MJ, Hoverman JT, Miller DL. Development and disease: how susceptibility to an emerging pathogen changes through anuran development. PLoS One 2011; 6:e22307 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Green DE, Converse KA, Schrader AK. Epizootiology of sixty-four amphibian morbidity and mortality events in the USA, 1996-2001. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002; 969:323–339 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Johnson PTJ, Kellermanns E, Bowerman J. Critical windows of disease risk: amphibian pathology driven by developmental changes in host resistance and tolerance. Funct Ecol 2011; 25:726–734 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Savage AE, Sredl MJ, Zamudio KR. Disease dynamics vary spatially and temporally in a North American amphibian. Biol Conserv 2011; 144:1910–1915 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Longo AV, Ossiboff RJ, Zamudio KR, Burrowes PA. Lability in host defenses: terrestrial frogs die from chytridiomycosis under enzootic conditions. J Wildl Dis 2013; 49:197–199 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Brunner JL, Storfer A, Gray MJ, Hoverman JT. Ranavirus ecology and evolution: from epidemiology to extinction. In Ranaviruses Cham: Springer; 2015 pp 71–104 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Olori JC, Netzband R, McKean N, Lowery J, Parsons K et al. Multi-year dynamics of ranavirus, chytridiomycosis, and co-infections in a temperate host assemblage of amphibians. Dis Aquat Org 2018; 130:187–197 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hall EM, Goldberg CS, Brunner JL, Crespi EJ. Seasonal dynamics and potential drivers of ranavirus epidemics in wood frog populations. Oecologia 2018; 188:1253–1262 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Thumsová B, Price SJ, González-Cascón V, Vörös J, Martínez-Silvestre A et al. Climate warming triggers the emergence of native viruses in Iberian amphibians. iScience 2022; 25:105541 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kueneman JG, Parfrey LW, Woodhams DC, Archer HM, Knight R et al. The amphibian skin-associated microbiome across species, space and life history stages. Mol Ecol 2014; 23:1238–1250 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Longo AV, Savage AE, Hewson I, Zamudio KR. Seasonal and ontogenetic variation of skin microbial communities and relationships to natural disease dynamics in declining amphibians. R Soc Open Sci 2015; 2:140377 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Langhammer PF, Burrowes PA, Lips KR, Bryant AB, Collins JP. Susceptibility to the amphibian chytrid fungus varies with ontogeny in the direct-developing frog, Eleutherodactylus coqui. J Wildl Dis 2014; 50:438–446 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Longo AV, Zamudio KR. Environmental fluctuations and host skin bacteria shift survival advantage between frogs and their fungal pathogen. ISME J 2017; 11:349–361 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Campbell LJ, Pawlik AH, Harrison XA, Lesbarrères D. Amphibian ranaviruses in Europe: important directions for future research. FACETS 2020; 5:598–614 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Farmer AL, Enge KM, Jensen JB, Stevenson DJ, Smith LL. A range-wide assessment of the status and distribution of the striped newt (Notophthalmus perstriatus). Herpetol Conserv Biol 2017; 12:585–598
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Hartmann AM, Maddox ML, Ossiboff RJ, Longo AV. Sustained ranavirus outbreak causes mass mortality and morbidity of imperiled amphibians in Florida. Ecohealth 2022; 19:8–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Johnson SA. Life history of the striped newt at a north-central Florida breeding pond. Southeastern Naturalist 2002; 1:381–402 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Boyle DG, Boyle DB, Olsen V, Morgan JAT, Hyatt AD. Rapid quantitative detection of chytridiomycosis (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) in amphibian samples using real-time Taqman PCR assay. Dis Aquat Organ 2004; 60:141–148 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Allender MC, Bunick D, Mitchell MA. Development and validation of TaqMan quantitative PCR for detection of frog virus 3-like virus in eastern box turtles (Terrapene carolina carolina). J Virol Methods 2013; 188:121–125 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Miller DL, Pessier AP, Hick P, Whittington RJ. Comparative Pathology of Ranaviruses and Diagnostic Techniques. In Gray MJ, Chinchar VG. eds Ranaviruses Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015 pp 171–208 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108 Suppl 1:4516–4522 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 2019; 37:852–857 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 2016; 13:581–583 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 2013; 8:e61217 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41:D590–D596 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Bray JR, Curtis JT. An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monog 1957; 27:325–349 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Lozupone C, Lladser ME, Knights D, Stombaugh J, Knight R. UniFrac: an effective distance metric for microbial community comparison. ISME J 2011; 5:169–172 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Smith R. ecole: ecole: School of Ecology Package; 2021 https://github.com/phytomosaic/ecole
  54. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR et al. Package ‘Vegan'. Community Ecology Package, Version 2013; 2:1–295
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Neu AT, Allen EE, Roy K. Defining and quantifying the core microbiome: challenges and prospects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:e2104429118 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Russel J. MicEco: various functions for microbial community data; 2022
  57. Lin H, Peddada SD. Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction. Nat Commun 2020; 11:3514 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  58. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021 https://www.R-project.org/
  59. Dodd CK. Cost of living in an unpredictable environment: the ecology of striped newts Notophthalmus perstriatus during a prolonged drought. Copeia 1993; 1993:605 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Albecker MA, Belden LK, McCoy MW. Comparative analysis of anuran amphibian skin microbiomes across Inland and Coastal Wetlands. Microb Ecol 2019; 78:348–360 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Michaels CJ. 2022; Effects of aquatic and terrestrial habitats on the skin microbiome and growth rate of juvenile alpine newts Ichthyosaura alpestris. Herpetol J51–58 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Keady MM, Jimenez RR, Bragg M, Wagner JCP, Bornbusch SL et al. Ecoevolutionary processes structure milk microbiomes across the mammalian tree of life. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023; 120:e2218900120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Heys C, Cheaib B, Busetti A, Kazlauskaite R, Maier L et al. Neutral processes dominate microbial community assembly in Atlantic Salmon, Salmo salar. Appl Environ Microbiol 2020; 86:e02283-19 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Sabino-Pinto J, Galán P, Rodríguez S, Bletz MC, Bhuju S et al. Temporal changes in cutaneous bacterial communities of terrestrial- and aquatic-phase newts (Amphibia). Environ Microbiol 2017; 19:3025–3038 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Wuerthner VP, Hua J, Hernández-Gómez O. Life stage and proximity to roads shape the skin microbiota of eastern newts (Notophthalmus viridescens). Environ Microbiol 2022; 24:3954–3965 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Voyles J, Rosenblum EB, Berger L. Interactions between Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and its amphibian hosts: a review of pathogenesis and immunity. Microbes Infect 2011; 13:25–32 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Debray R, Herbert RA, Jaffe AL, Crits-Christoph A, Power ME et al. Priority effects in microbiome assembly. Nat Rev Microbiol 2022; 20:109–121 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Jani AJ, Briggs CJ. The pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis disturbs the frog skin microbiome during a natural epidemic and experimental infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:E5049–E5058 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Walke JB, Becker MH, Loftus SC, House LL, Teotonio TL et al. Community structure and function of amphibian skin microbes: an experiment with bullfrogs exposed to a Chytrid fungus. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0139848 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Harrison XA, Price SJ, Hopkins K, Leung WTM, Sergeant C et al. Diversity-stability dynamics of the amphibian skin microbiome and susceptibility to a lethal viral pathogen. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:2883 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Means RC, Means RPM, Beshel M, Mendyk R, Hill P et al. A conservation strategy for the imperiled Western striped newt in the Apalachicola National forest. FL 2016; 6:
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Hoverman JT, Gray MJ, Haislip NA, Miller DL. Phylogeny, life history, and ecology contribute to differences in amphibian susceptibility to ranaviruses. Ecohealth 2011; 8:301–319 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Means RC, Means RPM, Beshel M, Mendyk R, Hill P et al. A conservation strategy for the imperiled Western striped newt in the Apalachicola National Forest. FL 2017; 7:
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Kenison EK, Williams RN. Training for translocation: predator conditioning induces behavioral plasticity and physiological changes in captive Eastern Hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis) (Cryptobranchidae, Amphibia). Diversity 2018; 10:13 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Teixeira CP, de Azevedo CS, Mendl M, Cipreste CF, Young RJ. Revisiting translocation and reintroduction programmes: the importance of considering stress. Animal Behaviour 2007; 73:1–13 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Dickens MJ, Delehanty DJ, Michael Romero L. Stress: an inevitable component of animal translocation. Biol Conserv 2010; 143:1329–1341 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Becker MH, Richards-Zawacki CL, Gratwicke B, Belden LK. The effect of captivity on the cutaneous bacterial community of the critically endangered Panamanian golden frog (Atelopus zeteki). Biol Conserv 2014; 176:199–206 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Bataille A, Lee-Cruz L, Tripathi B, Kim H, Waldman B. Microbiome variation across amphibian skin regions: implications for Chytridiomycosis mitigation efforts. Microb Ecol 2016; 71:221–232 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Sommer F, Bäckhed F. The gut microbiota--masters of host development and physiology. Nat Rev Microbiol 2013; 11:227–238 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Dallas JW, Warne RW. Captivity and animal microbiomes: potential roles of microbiota for influencing animal conservation. Microb Ecol 2023; 85:820–838 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Kueneman JG, Bletz MC, Becker M, Gratwicke B, Garcés OA et al. Effects of captivity and rewilding on amphibian skin microbiomes. Biol Conserv 2022; 271:109576 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Estrada A, Medina D, Gratwicke B, Ibáñez R, Belden LK. Body condition, skin bacterial communities and disease status: insights from the first release trial of the limosa harlequin frog, Atelopus limosus. Proc Biol Sci 2022; 289:20220586 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Della Togna G, Howell LG, Clulow J, Langhorne CJ, Marcec-Greaves R et al. Evaluating amphibian biobanking and reproduction for captive breeding programs according to the amphibian conservation action Plan objectives. Theriogenology 2020; 150:412–431 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Semlitsch RD, Wilbur HM. Effects of pond drying time on metamorphosis and survival in the Salamander Ambystoma talpoideum. Copeia 1988978–983 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Relyea RA. Getting out alive: how predators affect the decision to metamorphose. Oecologia 2007; 152:389–400 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Relman DA. The human microbiome: ecosystem resilience and health. Nutr Rev 2012; 70:S2–S9 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001399
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001399
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error