1887

Abstract

Daptomycin is a membrane-targeting lipopeptide antibiotic used in the treatment of infective endocarditis caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria such as , enterococci and viridans group streptococci. Despite demonstrating excellent activity and a low prevalence of resistant isolates, treatment failure is a significant concern, particularly for enterococcal infection. We have shown recently that human serum triggers daptomycin tolerance in , but it was not clear if a similar phenotype occurred in other major infective endocarditis pathogens. We found that , or grown under standard laboratory conditions were efficiently killed by daptomycin, whereas bacteria pre-incubated in human serum survived exposure to the antibiotic, with >99 % cells remaining viable. Incubation of enterococci or streptococci in serum led to peptidoglycan accumulation, as shown by increased incorporation of the fluorescent -amino acid analogue HADA. Inhibition of peptidoglycan accumulation using the antibiotic fosfomycin resulted in a >tenfold reduction in serum-induced daptomycin tolerance, demonstrating the important contribution of the cell wall to the phenotype. We also identified a small contribution to daptomycin tolerance in from cardiolipin synthases, although this may reflect the inherent increased susceptibility of cardiolipin-deficient mutants. In summary, serum-induced daptomycin tolerance is a consistent phenomenon between Gram-positive infective endocarditis pathogens, but it may be mitigated using currently available antibiotic combination therapy.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (Award Imperial College London)
    • Principle Award Recipient: AndrewM Edwards
  • Wellcome Trust (Award 203812/Z/16/Z)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ElizabethVK Ledger
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001282
2022-12-16
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/168/12/mic001282.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001282&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Cahill TJ, Prendergast BD. Infective endocarditis. Lancet 2016; 387:882–893 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Werdan K, Dietz S, Löffler B, Niemann S, Bushnaq H et al. Mechanisms of infective endocarditis: pathogen-host interaction and risk states. Nat Rev Cardiol 2014; 11:35–50 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, Miró JM, Fowler VG et al. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the international collaboration on endocarditis-prospective cohort study. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169:463–473 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lockhart PB, Brennan MT, Thornhill M, Michalowicz BS, Noll J et al. Poor oral hygiene as a risk factor for infective endocarditis-related bacteremia. J Am Dent Assoc 2009; 140:1238–1244 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Sullam PM, Drake TA, Sande MA. Pathogenesis of endocarditis. Am J Med 1985; 78:110–115 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Jung CJ, Yeh CY, Shun CT, Hsu RB, Cheng HW et al. Platelets enhance biofilm formation and resistance of endocarditis-inducing streptococci on the injured heart valve. J Infect Dis 2012; 205:1066–1075 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Que YA, Moreillon P. Infective endocarditis. Nat Rev Cardiol 2011; 8:322–336 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chamat-Hedemand S, Dahl A, Østergaard L, Arpi M, Fosbøl E et al. Prevalence of infective endocarditis in Streptococcal bloodstream infections is dependent on Streptococcal species. Circulation 2020; 142:720–730 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dahl A, Fowler VG, Miro JM, Bruun NE. Sign of the times: updating infective endocarditis diagnostic criteria to recognize Enterococcus faecalis as a typical endocarditis bacterium. Clin Infect Dis 2022; 75:1097–1102 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, Bongiorni MG, Casalta J-P et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J 2015; 36:3075–3128 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Prendergast BD, Tornos P. Surgery for infective endocarditis: who and when?. Circulation 2010; 121:1141–1152 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ventola CL. The antibiotic resistance crisis: part 1: causes and threats. P T 2015; 40:277–283
    [Google Scholar]
  13. CDC Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC 2019
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gordon KA, Beach ML, Biedenbach DJ, Jones RN, Rhomberg PR et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of beta-hemolytic and viridans group streptococci: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997-2000). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002; 43:157–162 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ledger EVK, Sabnis A, Edwards AM. Polymyxin and lipopeptide antibiotics: membrane-targeting drugs of last resort. Microbiology 2022; 168:001136 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gray DA, Wenzel M. More than a pore: A current perspective on the in vivo mode of action of the lipopeptide antibiotic daptomycin. Antibiotics 2020; 9:17 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Turnidge J, Kahlmeter G, Cantón R, MacGowan A, Giske CG et al. Daptomycin in the treatment of enterococcal bloodstream infections and endocarditis: a EUCAST position paper. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020; 26:1039–1043 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Taylor SD, Palmer M. The action mechanism of daptomycin. Bioorg Med Chem 2016; 24:6253–6268 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Muraih JK, Pearson A, Silverman J, Palmer M. Oligomerization of daptomycin on membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011; 1808:1154–1160 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Silverman JA, Perlmutter NG, Shapiro HM. Correlation of daptomycin bactericidal activity and membrane depolarization in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47:2538–2544 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Müller A, Wenzel M, Strahl H, Grein F, Saaki TNV et al. Daptomycin inhibits cell envelope synthesis by interfering with fluid membrane microdomains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016; 113:E7077–E7086 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Grein F, Müller A, Scherer KM, Liu X, Ludwig KC et al. Ca2+-Daptomycin targets cell wall biosynthesis by forming a tripartite complex with undecaprenyl-coupled intermediates and membrane lipids. Nat Commun 2020; 11:1455 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. King A, Phillips I. The in vitro activity of daptomycin against 514 Gram-positive aerobic clinical isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001; 48:219–223 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sader HS, Streit JM, Fritsche TR, Jones RN. Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated from European medical centres: results of the Daptomycin Surveillance Programme (2002-2004). Clin Microbiol Infect 2006; 12:844–852 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Streit JM, Steenbergen JN, Thorne GM, Alder J, Jones RN. Daptomycin tested against 915 bloodstream isolates of viridans group streptococci (eight species) and Streptococcus bovis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 55:574–578 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Seaton RA, Menichetti F, Dalekos G, Beiras-Fernandez A, Nacinovich F et al. Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of High-Dose Daptomycin: Results from Patients Included in the European Cubicin(®) Outcomes Registry and Experience. Adv Ther 2015; 32:1192–1205 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kuehl R, Morata L, Meylan S, Mensa J, Soriano A. When antibiotics fail: a clinical and microbiological perspective on antibiotic tolerance and persistence of Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 75:1071–1086 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ledger EVK, Mesnage S, Edwards AM. Human serum triggers antibiotic tolerance in Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Commun 2022; 13:2041 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jacob AE, Hobbs SJ. Conjugal transfer of plasmid-borne multiple antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus faecalis var. zymogenes. J Bacteriol 1974; 117:360–372 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ike Y, Craig RA, White BA, Yagi Y, Clewell DB. Modification of Streptococcus faecalis sex pheromones after acquisition of plasmid DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1983; 80:5369–5373 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. PAKULA R, WALCZAK W. On the nature of competence of transformable streptococci. J Gen Microbiol 1963; 31:125–133 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ajdić D, McShan WM, McLaughlin RE, Savić G, Chang J et al. Genome sequence of Streptococcus mutans UA159, a cariogenic dental pathogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99:14434–14439 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Patel J, Cockerill F, Bradford P, Eliopoulos G, Hindler J et al. ISBN, 10th ed. Wayne, Pa: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2015 pp 1–56238
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kuru E, Hughes HV, Brown PJ, Hall E, Tekkam S et al. In situ probing of newly synthesized peptidoglycan in live bacteria with fluorescent D-amino acids. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2012; 51:12519–12523 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee BL, Sachdeva M, Chambers HF. Effect of protein binding of daptomycin on MIC and antibacterial activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35:2505–2508 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Dvorchik BH, Brazier D, DeBruin MF, Arbeit RD. Daptomycin pharmacokinetics and safety following administration of escalating doses once daily to healthy subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47:1318–1323 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ledger EVK, Pader V, Edwards AM. Enterococcus faecalis and pathogenic streptococci inactivate daptomycin by releasing phospholipids. Microbiology 2017; 163:1502–1508 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Silver LL. Fosfomycin: Mechanism and Resistance. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2017; 7:a025262 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Rice LB, Eliopoulos GM, Moellering RC. In vitro synergism between daptomycin and fosfomycin against Enterococcus faecalis isolates with high-level gentamicin resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1989; 33:470–473 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Keepers TR, Gomez M, Celeri C, Krause KM, Biek D et al. Fosfomycin and comparator activity against select Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas, and Enterococcus urinary tract infection isolates from the United States in 2012. Infect Dis Ther 2017; 6:233–243 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Woodall BM, Harp JR, Brewer WT, Tague ED, Campagna SR et al. Enterococcus faecalis Readily Adapts Membrane Phospholipid Composition to Environmental and Genetic Perturbation. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:616045 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Vebø HC, Snipen L, Nes IF, Brede DA. The transcriptome of the nosocomial pathogen Enterococcus faecalis V583 reveals adaptive responses to growth in blood. PLoS One 2009; 4:e7660 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Saito HE, Harp JR, Fozo EM. Incorporation of exogenous fatty acids protects Enterococcus faecalis from membrane-damaging agents. Appl Environ Microbiol 2014; 80:6527–6538 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Harp JR, Saito HE, Bourdon AK, Reyes J, Arias CA et al. Exogenous fatty acids protect Enterococcus faecalis from daptomycin-induced membrane stress independently of the response regulator LiaR. Appl Environ Microbiol 2016; 82:4410–4420 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Brewer W, Harrison J, Saito HE, Fozo EM. Induction of daptomycin tolerance in Enterococcus faecalis by fatty acid combinations. Appl Environ Microbiol 2020; 86:e01178-20 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Cui L, Tominaga E, Neoh H-M, Hiramatsu K. Correlation between reduced daptomycin susceptibility and vancomycin resistance in vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50:1079–1082 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Descourouez JL, Jorgenson MR, Wergin JE, Rose WE. Fosfomycin synergy in vitro with amoxicillin, daptomycin, and linezolid against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium from renal transplant patients with infected urinary stents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013; 57:1518–1520 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. García-de-la-Mària C, Gasch O, García-Gonzalez J, Soy D, Shaw E et al. The combination of daptomycin and fosfomycin has synergistic, potent, and rapid bactericidal activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a rabbit model of experimental endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2018; 62:e02633-17 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Johnston RD, Woodall BM, Harrison J, Campagna SR, Fozo EM et al. Removal of peptidoglycan and inhibition of active cellular processes leads to daptomycin tolerance in Enterococcus faecalis. PLoS ONE 2021; 16:e0254796 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Miró JM, Entenza JM, Del Río A, Velasco M, Castañeda X et al. High-dose daptomycin plus fosfomycin is safe and effective in treating methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56:4511–4515 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Dunny GM, Brown BL, Clewell DB. Induced cell aggregation and mating in Streptococcus faecalis: evidence for a bacterial sex pheromone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1978; 75:3479–3483 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001282
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001282
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error