1887

Abstract

Tailocins are ribosomally synthesized bacteriocins, encoded by bacterial genomes, but originally derived from bacteriophage tails. As with both bacteriocins and phage, tailocins are largely thought to be species-specific with killing activity often assumed to be directed against closely related strains. Previous investigations into interactions between tailocin host range and sensitivity across phylogenetically diverse isolates of the phytopathogen have demonstrated that many strains possess intraspecific tailocin activity and that this activity is highly precise and specific against subsets of strains. However, here we demonstrate that at least one strain of USA011R, defies both expectations and current overarching dogma because tailocins from this strain possess broad killing activity against other agriculturally significant phytopathogens such as and as well as against the clinical human pathogen serovar Choleraesui. Moreover, we show that the full spectrum of this interspecific killing activity is not conserved across closely related strains with data suggesting that even if tailocins can target different species, they do so with different efficiencies. Our results reported herein highlight the potential for and phenotypic divergence of interspecific killing activity of tailocins and establish a platform for further investigations into the evolution of tailocin host range and strain specificity.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Arizona Department of Agriculture (Award SCBGP-19-24)
    • Principle Award Recipient: DavidA Baltrus
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Award 2016-67014-24805)
    • Principle Award Recipient: DavidA Baltrus
  • Division of Integrative Organismal Systems (Award IOS 1856556)
    • Principle Award Recipient: DavidA Baltrus
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001258
2022-11-07
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/168/11/mic001258.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001258&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. McManus PS, Stockwell VO, Sundin GW, Jones AL. Antibiotic use in plant agriculture. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2002; 40:443–465 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Stockwell VO, Duffy B. Use of antibiotics in plant agriculture. Rev Sci Tech 2012; 31:199–210 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersson DI, Diarmaid H. Microbiological effects of sublethal levels of antibiotics. Nat Rev Microbiol 2014; 12:465–478 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Aslam B, Khurshid M, Arshad MI, Muzammil S, Rasool M et al. Antibiotic Resistance: One Health One World Outlook. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021; 11:771510 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Buttimer C, McAuliffe O, Ross RP, Hill C, O’Mahony J et al. Bacteriophages and Bacterial Plant Diseases. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:34 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Meaden S, Koskella B. Exploring the risks of phage application in the environment. Front Microbiol 2013; 4:358 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Riley MA, Wertz JE. Bacteriocins: evolution, ecology, and application. Annual Review of Microbiology 2002; 56:117–137 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Baltrus DA, Meara C, Kevin LH, Madison M, Caitlin S et al. Prophylactic application of tailocins prevents infection by Pseudomonas syringae. Phytopathology 2022; 112:561–566 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cotter PD, Ross RP, Hill C. Bacteriocins - a viable alternative to antibiotics?. Nat Rev Microbiol 2013; 11:95–105 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Patz S, Becker Y, Richert-Pöggeler KR, Berger B, Ruppel S et al. Phage tail-like particles are versatile bacterial nanomachines - A mini-review. J Adv Res 2019; 19:75–84 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sheth RU, Cabral V, Chen SP, Wang HH. Manipulating bacterial communities by in situ microbiome engineering. Trends Genetics 2016; 32:189–200 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Rooney WM, Grinter RW, Correia A, Parkhill J, Walker DC et al. Engineering bacteriocin-mediated resistance against the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Plant Biotechnol J 2020; 18:1296–1306 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ghequire MGK, De Mot R. The tailocin tale: peeling off phage tails. Trends Microbiol 2015; 23:587–590 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gillor O, Etzion A, Riley MA. The dual role of bacteriocins as anti- and probiotics. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2008; 81:591–606 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jayaraman J, Jones WT, Harvey D, Hemara LM, McCann HC et al. Variation at the common polysaccharide antigen locus drives lipopolysaccharide diversity within the Pseudomonas syringae species complex. Environ Microbiol 2020; 22:5356–5372 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Köhler T, Donner V, van Delden C. Lipopolysaccharide as shield and receptor for R-pyocin-mediated killing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 2010; 192:1921–1928 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kandel PP, Baltrus DA, Hockett KL. Pseudomonas Can Survive Tailocin Killing via Persistence-Like and Heterogenous Resistance Mechanisms. J Bacteriol 2020; 202:e00142-20 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Príncipe A, Fernandez M, Torasso M, Godino A, Fischer S. Effectiveness of tailocins produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens SF4c in controlling the bacterial-spot disease in tomatoes caused by Xanthomonas vesicatoria. Microbiol Res 2018; 212–213:94–102 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Yao GW, Duarte I, Le TT, Carmody L, LiPuma JJ et al. A Broad-Host-Range Tailocin from Burkholderia cenocepacia. Appl Environ Microbiol 2017; 83:e03414-16 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Blackwell CC, Law JA. Typing of non-serogroupable Neisseria meningitidis by means of sensitivity to R-type pyocines of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Infect 1981; 3:370–378 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Campagnari AA, Karalus R, Apicella M, Melaugh W, Lesse AJ et al. Use of pyocin to select a Haemophilus ducreyi variant defective in lipooligosaccharide biosynthesis. Infect Immun 1994; 62:2379–2386 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Phillips NJ, John CM, Reinders LG, Gibson BW, Apicella MA et al. Structural models for the cell surface lipooligosaccharides of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Haemophilus influenzae. Biomed Environ Mass Spectrom 1990; 19:731–745 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Blackwell CC, Winstanley FP, Telfer Brunton WA. Sensitivity of thermophilic campylobacters to R-type pyocines of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Med Microbiol 1982; 15:247–251 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hockett KL, Renner T, Baltrus DA. Independent Co-Option of a Tailed Bacteriophage into a Killing Complex in Pseudomonas. mBio 2015; 6:e00452-15 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Baltrus DA, Clark M, Smith C, Hockett KL. Localized recombination drives diversification of killing spectra for phage-derived syringacins. ISME J 2019; 13:237–249 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Salazar AJ, Sherekar M, Tsai J, Sacchettini JC. R pyocin tail fiber structure reveals a receptor-binding domain with a lectin fold. PLoS ONE 2019; 14:e0211432 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hockett KL, Baltrus DA. Use of the Soft-agar Overlay Technique to Screen for Bacterially Produced Inhibitory Compounds. J Vis Exp 2017:119 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lerouge I, Vanderleyden J. O-antigen structural variation: mechanisms and possible roles in animal/plant-microbe interactions. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2002; 26:17–47 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Maldonado RF, Sá-Correia I, Valvano MA. Lipopolysaccharide modification in Gram-negative bacteria during chronic infection. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2016; 40:480–493 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ehau-Taumaunu H, Hockett KL. The plant host environment influences competitive interactions between bacterial pathogens. Environ Microbiol Rep 2022; 14:785–794 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Newman MA, von Roepenack E, Daniels M, Dow M. Lipopolysaccharides and plant responses to phytopathogenic bacteria. Mol Plant Pathol 2000; 1:25–31 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ormeño-Orrillo E, Rosenblueth M, Luyten E, Vanderleyden J, Martínez-Romero E. Mutations in lipopolysaccharide biosynthetic genes impair maize rhizosphere and root colonization of Rhizobium tropici CIAT899. Environ Microbiol 2008; 10:1271–1284 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Rapicavoli JN, Blanco-Ulate B, Muszyński A, Figueroa-Balderas R, Morales-Cruz A et al. Lipopolysaccharide O-antigen delays plant innate immune recognition of Xylella fastidiosa. Nat Commun 2018; 9:1–12 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Morris CE, Sands DC, Vanneste JL, Montarry J, Oakley B et al. Inferring the evolutionary history of the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae from its biogeography in headwaters of rivers in North America, Europe, and New Zealand. mBio 2010; 1:e00107-10 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001258
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001258
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error