1887

Abstract

A previous study reported that the (Msm) protein MSMEG_2295 is a repressor controlling the expression of several genes, including that for MSMEG_5125, a putative isoprenoid binding protein belonging to the YceI family, and DinB2, a DNA damage repair enzyme. This repressor is encoded by the first gene of the operon that also expresses the gene for DinB2. Targeted inhibition of MSMEG_5125 using CRISPRi technology resulted in a significant loss of Msm’s respiratory activity and viability. Since this protein has been predicted to be an isoprenoid binding protein, we suspected a role of menaquinones, which are isoprenoid naphthoquinones, in the observed phenomenon. Accordingly, we tested whether MSMEG_5125’s deficiency-induced lethality could be reversed by adding menaquinone. The result was positive, implying cooperation between MSMEG_5125 and menaquinone in bringing about respiration. Inhibition of expression led to the induction of and , two hallmark genes of the MSMEG_2295 regulon. This result suggests that when MSMEG_5125 becomes limiting, a feedback-loop derepresses the MSMEG_2295 regulon genes, including its own. Interestingly, menaquinone functioned as an inducer of , indicating that it is likely to mediate the feedback mechanism. This result also strengthens our hypothesis that the functions of menaquinone and MSMEG_5125 are interrelated. Menaquinone also induced the MSMEG_2295-controlled operon () not induced following the inactivation of . Therefore, the activation mechanism of MSMEG_2295-regulated genes may not be the same for all, although derepression is likely to be a common feature. , menaquinone abolished MSMEG_2295’s DNA binding activity by interacting with it, confirming its role as an inducer. Therefore, a menaquinone–MSMEG_5125-regulated gene expression circuit controls Msm respiration and possibly oxidative stress-induced DNA damage repair.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001192
2022-05-16
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/168/5/mic001192.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001192&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Sacchettini JC, Rubin EJ, Freundlich JS. Drugs versus bugs: in pursuit of the persistent predator Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Rev Microbiol 2008; 6:41–52 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gupta S, Chatterji D. Stress responses in mycobacteria. IUBMB Life 2005; 57:149–159 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cook GM, Hards K, Vilchèze C, Hartman T, Berney M. Energetics of respiration and oxidative phosphorylation in mycobacteria. Microbiol Spectr 2014; 2: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boshoff HIM, Barry CE 3rd. Tuberculosis - metabolism and respiration in the absence of growth. Nat Rev Microbiol 2005; 3:70–80 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang Y. Persisters, persistent infections and the Yin-Yang model. Emerg Microbes Infect 2014; 3:e3 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lewis K. Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease. Nat Rev Microbiol 2007; 5:48–56 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lamprecht DA, Finin PM, Rahman MA, Cumming BM, Russell SL et al. Turning the respiratory flexibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis against itself. Nat Commun 2016; 7:12393 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Deoghare S. Bedaquiline: a new drug approved for treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Indian J Pharmacol 2013; 45:536–537 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Søballe B, Poole RK. Microbial ubiquinones: multiple roles in respiration, gene regulation and oxidative stress management. Microbiology (Reading) 1999; 145 (Pt 8):1817–1830 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dhiman RK, Mahapatra S, Slayden RA, Boyne ME, Lenaerts A et al. Menaquinone synthesis is critical for maintaining mycobacterial viability during exponential growth and recovery from non-replicating persistence. Mol Microbiol 2009; 72:85–97 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Patra MM, Ghosh P, Sengupta S, Das Gupta SK. DNA binding and gene regulatory functions of msmeg_2295, a repressor encoded by the. Microbiology (Reading) 2021; 167:10 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Balhana RJC, Singla A, Sikder MH, Withers M, Kendall SL. Global analyses of TetR family transcriptional regulators in mycobacteria indicates conservation across species and diversity in regulated functions. BMC Genomics 2015; 16:479 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jarosz DF, Beuning PJ, Cohen SE, Walker GC. Y-family DNA polymerases in Escherichia coli. Trends Microbiol 2007; 15:70–77 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Boshoff HIM, Reed MB, Barry CE 3rd, Mizrahi V. DnaE2 polymerase contributes to in vivo survival and the emergence of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Cell 2003; 113:183–193 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ghosh S, Samaddar S, Kirtania P, Das Gupta SK. A DinB ortholog enables mycobacterial growth under dTTP-limiting conditions induced by the expression of a mycobacteriophage-derived ribonucleotide reductase gene. J Bacteriol 2016; 198:352–362 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ordonez H, Uson ML, Shuman S. Characterization of three mycobacterial DinB (DNA polymerase IV) paralogs highlights DinB2 as naturally adept at ribonucleotide incorporation. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:11056–11070 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Handa N, Terada T, Doi-Katayama Y, Hirota H, Tame JRH et al. Crystal structure of a novel polyisoprenoid-binding protein from Thermus thermophilus HB8. Protein Sci 2005; 14:1004–1010 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Stancik LM, Stancik DM, Schmidt B, Barnhart DM, Yoncheva YN et al. pH-dependent expression of periplasmic proteins and amino acid catabolism in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 2002; 184:4246–4258 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Choudhary E, Thakur P, Pareek M, Agarwal N. Gene silencing by CRISPR interference in mycobacteria. Nat Commun 2015; 6:6267 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Bhawsinghka N, Dutta A, Mukhopadhyay J, Das Gupta SK. A transcriptomic analysis of the mycobacteriophage D29 genome reveals the presence of novel stoperator-associated promoters in its right arm. Microbiology (Reading) 2018; 164:1168–1179 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Warner DF, Etienne G, Wang X-M, Matsoso LG, Dawes SS et al. A derivative of Mycobacterium smegmatis mc(2)155 that lacks the duplicated chromosomal region. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2006; 86:438–444 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Boshoff HIM, Myers TG, Copp BR, McNeil MR, Wilson MA et al. The transcriptional responses of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to inhibitors of metabolism: novel insights into drug mechanisms of action. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:40174–40184 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sengupta S, Bhawsinghka N, Shaw R, Patra MM, Das Gupta SK. Mycobacteriophage D29 induced association of Mycobacterial RNA polymerase with ancillary factors leads to increased transcriptional activity. Microbiology (Reading) 2022; 168: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Fernandez-Escamilla AM, Fernandez-Ballester G, Morel B, Casares-Atienza S, Ramos JL. Molecular binding mechanism of TtgR repressor to antibiotics and antimicrobials. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0138469 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Warman EA, Forrest D, Guest T, Haycocks JJRJ, Wade JT et al. Widespread divergent transcription from bacterial and archaeal promoters is a consequence of DNA-sequence symmetry. Nat Microbiol 2021; 6:746–756 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Korshunov S, Imlay JA. Detection and quantification of superoxide formed within the periplasm of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 2006; 188:6326–6334 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Anand A, Chen K, Yang L, Sastry AV, Olson CA et al. Adaptive evolution reveals a tradeoff between growth rate and oxidative stress during naphthoquinone-based aerobic respiration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019; 116:25287–25292 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Dupuy P, Howlader M, Glickman MS. A multilayered repair system protects the mycobacterial chromosome from endogenous and antibiotic-induced oxidative damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117:19517–19527 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Bashiri G, Nigon LV, Jirgis ENM, Ho NAT, Stanborough T et al. Allosteric regulation of menaquinone (vitamin K). J Biol Chem 2020; 295:3759–3770
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang Y, Dhandayuthapani S, Deretic V. Molecular basis for the exquisite sensitivity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to isoniazid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93:13212–13216 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001192
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001192
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error