1887

Abstract

Research on prokaryotic epigenetics, the study of heritable changes in gene expression independent of sequence changes, led to the identification of DNA methylation as a versatile regulator of diverse cellular processes. Methylation of adenine bases is often linked to regulation of gene expression in bacteria, but cytosine methylation is also frequently observed. In this study, we present a complete overview of the cytosine methylome in , an opportunistic respiratory pathogen in cystic fibrosis patients. Single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing was used to map all 4mC-modified cytosines, as analysis of the predicted MTases in the genome revealed the presence of a 4mC-specific phage MTase, M.BceJII, targeting GGC sequences. Methylation motif GCGGCGC was identified, and out of 6850 motifs detected across the genome, 2051 (29.9 %) were methylated at the fifth position. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) was performed to map 5mC methylation and 1635 5mC-modified cytosines were identified in pG motifs. A comparison of the genomic positions of the modified bases called by each method revealed no overlap, which confirmed the authenticity of the detected 4mC and 5mC methylation by SMRT sequencing and WGBS, respectively. Large inter-strain variation of the 4mC-methylated cytosines was observed when strains J2315 and K56-2 were compared, which suggests that GGC methylation patterns in are strain-specific. It seems likely that 4mC methylation of GGC is not involved in regulation of gene expression but rather is a remnant of bacteriophage invasion, in which methylation of the phage genome was crucial for protection against restriction-modification systems of .

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • LeoEberl , Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung , (Award 31003A_169307)
  • IanVandenbussche , Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds , (Award BOFDOC2016001301)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001027
2021-02-10
2021-02-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Weinhold B. Epigenetics: the science of change. Environ Heal Perspect 2006; 114: 160 167 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dupont C, Armant DR, Brenner CA. Epigenetics: definition, mechanisms and clinical perspective. Semin Reprod Med 2009; 27: 351 357 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Willbanks A, Leary M, Greenshields M, Tyminski C, Heerboth S et al. The evolution of epigenetics: from prokaryotes to humans and its biological consequences. 2016; 3 25 36
  4. Sánchez-Romero MA, Casadesús J. The bacterial epigenome. Nat Rev Microbiol 2020; 18: 7 20 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blow MJ, Clark TA, Daum CG, Deutschbauer AM, Fomenkov A et al. The epigenomic landscape of prokaryotes. PLoS Genet 2016; 12: e1005854 28 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Attwood JT, Yung RL, Richardson BC. DNA methylation and the regulation of gene transcription. Cell Mol Life Sci 2002; 59: 241 257 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bheemanaik S, Reddy YVR, Rao DN. Structure, function and mechanism of exocyclic DNA methyltransferases. Biochem J 2006; 399: 177 190 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar R, Rao DN. Role of DNA methyltransferases in epigenetic regulation in bacteria. Subcell Biochem 2013; 61: 81 102 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Adhikari S, Curtis PD. DNA methyltransferases and epigenetic regulation in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2016; 40: 575 591 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Low DA, Weyand NJ, Mahan MJ. Roles of DNA adenine methylation in regulating bacterial gene expression and virulence. Infect Immun 2001; 69: 7197 7204 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wion D, Casadesús J. N6-methyl-adenine: an epigenetic signal for DNA-protein interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 2006; 4: 183 192 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kumar S, Karmakar BC, Nagarajan D, Mukhopadhyay AK, Morgan RD et al. N4-cytosine DNA methylation regulates transcription and pathogenesis in Helicobacter pylori . Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46: 3429 3445 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Li S, Cai J, Lu H, Mao S, Dai S et al. N4-cytosine DNA methylation is involved in the maintenance of genomic stability in Deinococcus radiodurans . Front Microbiol 1905; 2019: 10
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Eid J, Fehr A, Gray J, Luong K, Lyle J et al. Real-Time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules. Science 2009; 323: 133 138 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Clark TA, Lu X, Luong K, Dai Q, Boitano M et al. Enhanced 5-methylcytosine detection in single-molecule, real-time sequencing via TET1 oxidation. BMC Biol 2013; 11: 4 10 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lister R, Pelizzola M, Dowen RH, Hawkins RD, Hon G et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature 2009; 462: 315 322 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Stuart T, Buckberry S, Lister R. Approaches for the analysis and interpretation of whole genome bisulfite sequencing data. Methods Mol Biol 2018; 1767: 299 310 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Clark SJ, Harrison J, Paul CL, Frommer M. High sensitivity mapping of methylated cytosines. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22: 2990 2997 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Yu M, Ji L, Neumann DA, Chung DH, Groom J et al. Base-resolution detection of N4-methylcytosine in genomic DNA using 4mC-Tet-assisted-bisulfitesequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43: 1 10
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Vilkaitis G, Klimasauskas S. Bisulfite sequencing protocol displays both 5-methylcytosine and N4-methylcytosine. Anal Biochem 1999; 271: 116 119 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mahenthiralingam E, Urban TA, Goldberg JB. The multifarious, multireplicon Burkholderia cepacia complex. Nat Rev Microbiol 2005; 3: 144 156 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Holden MTG, Seth-Smith HMB, Crossman LC, Sebaihia M, Bentley SD et al. The genome of Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315, an epidemic pathogen of cystic fibrosis patients. J Bacteriol 2009; 191: 261 277 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Drevinek P, Mahenthiralingam E. Burkholderia cenocepacia in cystic fibrosis: epidemiology and molecular mechanisms of virulence. Clin Microbiol Infect 2010; 16: 821 830 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Vandenbussche I, Sass A, Pinto-Carbo M, Mannweiler O, Eberl L et al. DNA methylation epigenetically regulates gene expression in Burkholderia cenocepacia . 2020; 5 e00455 20
  25. Sass A, Everaert A, Van AH, Den DFV, Coenye T. Targeting the nonmevalonate pathway in Burkholderia . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2018; 62: 1 9
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res 2009; 19: 1639 1645 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sass AM, Van Acker H, Förstner KU, Van Nieuwerburgh F, Deforce D et al. Genome-Wide transcription start site profiling in biofilm-grown Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315. BMC Genomics 2015; 16: 775 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ziller MJ, Hansen KD, Meissner A, Aryee MJ. Coverage recommendations for methylation analysis by whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Nat Methods 2015; 12: 230 232 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sánchez-Busó L, Golparian D, Parkhill J, Unemo M, Harris SR. Genetic variation regulates the activation and specificity of restriction-modification systems in Neisseria gonorrhoeae . Sci Rep 2019; 9: 1 11 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Erill I, Puigvert M, Legrand L, Guarischi-Sousa R, Vandecasteele C et al. Comparative analysis of Ralstonia solanacearum methylomes. Front Plant Sci 2017; 8: 504 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Dillon MM, Sung W, Lynch M, Cooper VS. The rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in the GC-rich multichromosome genome of Burkholderia cenocepacia . Genetics 2015; 200: 935 946 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. O'Brown ZK, Boulias K, Wang J, Wang SY, O'Brown NM et al. Sources of artifact in measurements of 6mA and 4mC abundance in eukaryotic genomic DNA. BMC Genomics 2019; 20: 445 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Beckmann ND, Karri S, Fang G, Bashir A. Detecting epigenetic motifs in low coverage and metagenomics settings. BMC Bioinformatics 2014; 15 Suppl 9: S16 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Zeng Y, Chen T. DNA methylation reprogramming during mammalian development. Genes 2019; 10: 257 106 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ji L, Sasaki T, Sun X, Ma P, Lewis ZA et al. Methylated DNA is over-represented in whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data. Front Genet 2014; 5: 1 10 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tierling S, Schmitt B, Walter J. Comprehensive evaluation of commercial Bisulfite-Based DNA methylation kits and development of an alternative protocol with improved conversion performance. Genet Epigenet 2018; 10: 1 7 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kernaleguen M, Daviaud C, Shen Y, Bonnet E, Renault V et al. Whole-Genome bisulfite sequencing for the analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation patterns at single-nucleotide resolution. Methods Mol Biol 2018; 1767: 311 349 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Chen YC, Liu T, Yu C-H, Chiang T-Y, Hwang C-C. Effects of GC bias in next-generation-sequencing data on de novo genome assembly. PLoS One 2013; 8: e62856 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Caparrós-Martín JA, McCarthy-Suárez I, Culiáñez-Macià FA. HAD hydrolase function unveiled by substrate screening: enzymatic characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana subclass I phosphosugar phosphatase AtSgpp. Planta 2013; 237: 943 954 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Yadav MK, Go YY, Chae S, Song J. The small molecule dam inhibitor, pyrimidinedione, disrupts Streptococcus pneumoniae biofilm growth in vitro. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0139238 35 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Casadesús J, Low D. Epigenetic gene regulation in the bacterial world. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2006; 70: 830 856 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kahramanoglou C, Prieto AI, Khedkar S, Haase B, Gupta A et al. Genomics of DNA cytosine methylation in Escherichia coli reveals its role in stationary phase transcription. Nat Commun 2012; 3: 886 889
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Ehrlich M, Zhang XY, Inamdar NM. Spontaneous deamination of cytosine and 5-methylcytosine residues in DNA and replacement of 5-methylcytosine residues with cytosine residues. Mutat Res 1990; 238: 277 286 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sánchez-Romero MA, Cota I, Casadesús J. DNA methylation in bacteria: from the methyl group to the methylome. Curr Opin Microbiol 2015; 25: 9 16 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Estibariz I, Overmann A, Ailloud F, Krebes J, Josenhans C et al. The core genome m5C methyltransferase JHP1050 (M.Hpy99III) plays an important role in orchestrating gene expression in Helicobacter pylori . Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47: 2336 2348 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Murray IA, Morgan RD, Luyten Y, Fomenkov A, Corrêa IR et al. The non-specific adenine DNA methyltransferase M.EcoGII. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46: 840 848 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Cooper DN. Eukaryotic DNA methylation. Hum Genet 1983; 64: 315 333 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Roberts RJ, Vincze T, Posfai J, Macelis D. REBASE – a database for DNA restriction and modification: enzymes, genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43: D298 D299 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Wojciechowski M, Czapinska H, Bochtler M. CpG underrepresentation and the bacterial CpG-specific DNA methyltransferase M.MpeI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110: 105 110 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Gouil Q, Keniry A. Latest techniques to study DNA methylation. Essays Biochem 2019; 63: 639 648 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Kiekens S, Sass A, Van Nieuwerburgh F, Deforce D, Coenye T. The Small RNA ncS35 regulates growth in Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315. mSphere 2018; 3: 1 16 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Hong K-W, Tee KK, Yin W-F, Roberts RJ, Chan K-G. Methylome characterization of Burkholderia pseudomallei strain 982 at single-base resolution. Microbiol Resour Announc 2019; 8: 1 3 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Pacific Biosciences SMRT link user guide v8.0. https://www.pacb.com/documentation/smrt-link-user-guide-v8-0/ . 2020
  54. Dziewit L, Czarnecki J, Wibberg D, Radlinska M, Mrozek P et al. Architecture and functions of a multipartite genome of the methylotrophic bacterium Paracoccus aminophilus JCM 7686, containing primary and secondary chromids. BMC Genomics 2014; 15: 124 16 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Wagner PL, Waldor MK. Bacteriophage control of bacterial virulence. Infect Immun 2002; 70: 3985 3993 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Brüssow H, Canchaya C, Hardt W-D, Jorch G, Kluge S. Phages and the evolution of bacterial pathogens: from genomic rearrangements to lysogenic conversion. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2004; 68: 560 602 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Hattman S, Malygin EG. Bacteriophage T2Dam and T4Dam DNA-[N6-adenine]-methyltransferases. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 2004; 77: 67 120 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Murphy J, Mahony J, Ainsworth S, Nauta A, van Sinderen D. Bacteriophage orphan DNA methyltransferases: insights from their bacterial origin, function, and occurrence. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013; 79: 7547 7555 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Vasu K, Nagaraja V. Diverse functions of restriction-modification systems in addition to cellular defense. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2013; 77: 53 72 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001027
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001027
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

EXCEL

Supplementary material 2

EXCEL

Supplementary material 3

EXCEL

Supplementary material 4

EXCEL

Supplementary material 5

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error