1887

Abstract

NADH dehydrogenase plays an important role in the central metabolism of almost all organisms, including acetic acid bacteria (AAB). In this study, the gene diversity of the NADH dehydrogenases in AAB was investigated. The distribution of the genes of the type I and type II NADH dehydrogenases in AAB was mostly congruent with their phylogenetic relationships. There are two phylogenetically distinct type I NADH dehydrogenase complexes, complex IA and complex IE. Complex IA′, which lacks the nuoM gene from complex IA, was only conserved in the genera Acetobacter , Gluconacetobacter and Komagataeibacter , which all have the ability to perform acetic acid fermentation, whereas the complex IE gene cluster was found randomly in several species of AAB. Almost all AAB, excluding the early-diverged species, had the type II NADH dehydrogenase, while some of the species also had the homologue with an amino acid replacement at the residue responsible for NADPH oxidation ability. Thus, the gene repertoire of NADH dehydrogenases shows a history of adaptation towards their habitats through gene expansions and losses and neo-functionalization in AAB.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.000774
2019-01-28
2024-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/165/3/287.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.000774&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Kanchanarach W, Theeragool G, Inoue T, Yakushi T, Adachi O et al. Acetic acid fermentation of acetobacter pasteurianus: relationship between acetic acid resistance and pellicle polysaccharide formation. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2010; 74:1591–1597 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Matsushita K, Toyama H, Adachi O. Respiratory chains and bioenergetics of acetic acid bacteria. Adv Microb Physiol 1994; 36:247–301[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Mullins EA, Francois JA, Kappock TJ. A specialized citric acid cycle requiring succinyl-coenzyme A (CoA):acetate CoA-transferase (AarC) confers acetic acid resistance on the acidophile Acetobacter aceti. J Bacteriol 2008; 190:4933–4940 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bringer S, Bott M. Central Carbon Metabolism and Respiration in Gluconobacter oxydans. In Matsushita K, Toyama H, Tonouchi N, Okamoto-Kainuma A. (editors) Acetic Acid Bacteria Tokyo: Springer; 2016 pp. pp235–pp253
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Matsushita K, Ohnishi T, Kaback HR. NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductases of the Escherichia coli aerobic respiratory chain. Biochemistry 1987; 26:7732–7737 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brandt U. Energy converting NADH:quinone oxidoreductase (complex I). Annu Rev Biochem 2006; 75:69–92 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Spero MA, Aylward FO, Currie CR, Donohue TJ. Phylogenomic analysis and predicted physiological role of the proton-translocating NADH:quinone oxidoreductase (complex I) across bacteria. MBio 2015; 6:6 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Spero MA, Brickner JR, Mollet JT, Pisithkul T, Amador-Noguez D et al. Different functions of phylogenetically distinct bacterial complex I Isozymes. J Bacteriol 2016; 198:1268–1280 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Marreiros BC, Sena FV, Sousa FM, Batista AP, Pereira MM. Type II NADH:quinone oxidoreductase family: phylogenetic distribution, structural diversity and evolutionary divergences. Environ Microbiol 2016; 18:4697–4709 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Desplats C, Beyly A, Cuiné S, Bernard L, Cournac L et al. Modification of substrate specificity in single point mutants of Agrobacterium tumefaciens type II NADH dehydrogenase. FEBS Lett 2007; 581:4017–4022 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kostner D, Luchterhand B, Junker A, Volland S, Daniel R et al. The consequence of an additional NADH dehydrogenase paralog on the growth of Gluconobacter oxydans DSM3504. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2015; 99:375–386 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sakurai K, Arai H, Ishii M, Igarashi Y. Transcriptome response to different carbon sources in Acetobacter aceti. Microbiology 2011; 157:899–910 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tatusova T, Ciufo S, Fedorov B, O'Neill K, Tolstoy I. RefSeq microbial genomes database: new representation and annotation strategy. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:D553–D559 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:3389–3402 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Matsutani M, Ito K, Azuma Y, Ogino H, Shirai M et al. Adaptive mutation related to cellulose producibility in Komagataeibacter medellinensis (Gluconacetobacter xylinus) NBRC 3288. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2015; 99:7229–7240 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Sakurai K, Arai H, Ishii M, Igarashi Y. Changes in the gene expression profile of Acetobacter aceti during growth on ethanol. J Biosci Bioeng 2012; 113:343–348 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Auriol C, Bestel-Corre G, Claude JB, Soucaille P, Meynial-Salles I. Stress-induced evolution of Escherichia coli points to original concepts in respiratory cofactor selectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2011; 108:1278–1283 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Guy L, Kultima JR, Andersson SG. genoPlotR: comparative gene and genome visualization in R. Bioinformatics 2010; 26:2334–2335 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Suzuki H, Lefébure T, Bitar PP, Stanhope MJ. Comparative genomic analysis of the genus Staphylococcus including Staphylococcus aureus and its newly described sister species Staphylococcus simiae. BMC Genomics 2012; 13:38 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Salichos L, Rokas A. Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals. Nature 2013; 497:327–331 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.000774
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.000774
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error