Electrostatic interactions are important for chaperone–client interaction in vivo

References

1. Balchin D, Hayer-Hartl M, Hartl FU. In vivo aspects of protein folding and quality control. Science 2016; 353:aac4354 [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Kim YE, Hipp MS, Bracher A, Hayer-Hartl M, Hartl FU. Molecular chaperone functions in protein folding and proteostasis. Annu Rev Biochem 2013; 82:323–355 [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Koldewey P, Horowitz S, Bardwell JCA. Chaperone-client interactions: non-specificity engenders multifunctionality. J Biol Chem 2017; 292:12010–12017 [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
4. Koldewey P, Stull F, Horowitz S, Martin R, Bardwell JCA. Forces driving chaperone action. Cell 2016; 166:369–379 [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Coyle JE, Jaeger J, Gross M, Robinson CV, Radford SE. Structural and mechanistic consequences of polypeptide binding by GroEL. Fold Des 1997; 2:R93–R104 [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Schreiber G, Haran G, Zhou HX. Fundamental aspects of protein-protein association kinetics. Chem Rev 2009; 109:839–860 [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Selzer T, Schreiber G. Predicting the rate enhancement of protein complex formation from the electrostatic energy of interaction. J Mol Biol 1999; 287:409–419 [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ferguson N, Capaldi AP, James R, Kleanthous C, Radford SE. Rapid folding with and without populated intermediates in the homologous four-helix proteins Im7 and Im9. J Mol Biol 1999; 286:1597–1608 [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Capaldi AP, Kleanthous C, Radford SE. Im7 folding mechanism: misfolding on a path to the native state. Nat Struct Biol 2002; 9:209–216 [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Stull F, Koldewey P, Humes JR, Radford SE, Bardwell JCA. Substrate protein folds while it is bound to the ATP-independent chaperone Spy. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2016; 23:53–58 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Horowitz S, Salmon L, Koldewey P, Ahlstrom LS, Martin R et al. Visualizing chaperone-assisted protein folding. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2016; 23:691–697 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
12. Quan S, Koldewey P, Tapley T, Kirsch N, Ruane KM et al. Genetic selection designed to stabilize proteins uncovers a chaperone called Spy. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011; 18:262–269 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Foit L, Morgan GJ, Kern MJ, Steimer LR, von Hacht AA et al. Optimizing protein stability in vivo. Mol Cell 2009; 36:861–871 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Nikaido H. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability revisited. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2003; 67:593–656 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
15. Park SH, Kukushkin Y, Gupta R, Chen T, Konagai A et al. PolyQ proteins interfere with nuclear degradation of cytosolic proteins by sequestering the Sis1p chaperone. Cell 2013; 154:134–145 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hrenovic J, Ivankovic T. Survival of Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter junii at various concentrations of sodium chloride. EurAsia J BioSci 2009; 3:144–151 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Goto Y, Fink AL. Conformational states of beta-lactamase: molten-globule states at acidic and alkaline pH with high salt. Biochemistry 1989; 28:945–952 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
18. Quan S, Wang L, Petrotchenko EV, Makepeace KA, Horowitz S et al. Super Spy variants implicate flexibility in chaperone action. Elife 2014; 3:e01584 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
19. Qu J, Mayer C, Behrens S, Holst O, Kleinschmidt JH. The trimeric periplasmic chaperone Skp of Escherichia coli forms 1:1 complexes with outer membrane proteins via hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions. J Mol Biol 2007; 374:91–105 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kararli TT. Comparison of the gastrointestinal anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry of humans and commonly used laboratory animals. Biopharm Drug Dispos 1995; 16:351–380 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cabral JP. Water microbiology. Bacterial pathogens and water. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2010; 7:3657–3703 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
22. Rozen Y, Belkin S. Survival of enteric bacteria in seawater. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2001; 25:513–529 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
23. Sleator RD, Hill C. Bacterial osmoadaptation: the role of osmolytes in bacterial stress and virulence. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2002; 26:49–71 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]