1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: The relatedness between several nomen species of the group and some other organisms was numerically fixed through DNA homology and DNA base composition. For Pseudomonas the numerically analysed strains proposed by Lysenko as neotypes were used. The mean % (G+C) was in the range 60-67.5. C-DNA from either or was hybridized with DNA from 17 different species centres and the DNA homology was in the range 50-100%. Genetic species differentiation in the genus seems justified. In three border cases ( and ) DNA homology was only 28-50%, so the inclusion of these organisms in the genus is uncertain. The species centres and are omitted from the genus because of their very low DNA homology and aberrant DNA base composition. Twenty-eight nomen species of all form a narrow group in the range 63.5-69% (G+C). With two exceptions DNA homology with a median strain was always over 75% and frequently nearly complete. C-DNA from hybridized with -DNA to the same extent as with the pseudomonads proper. The cluster overlapped perfectly with part of the group. It is proposed therefore to gather all xanthomonads in a single genetic species This is such a dense cluster that the preservation of separate species names for the border cases seems undesirable. About one half to two-thirds of and -DNA is identical. The genera and appeared to be rather closely related to since they shared some 40-50% of their DNA. The genus appeared to be more closely related to than to The genera and shared some 20-30% DNA with but -DNA was almost entirely different. From a comparison between DNA homology and taximetric similarity, it appeared that most pseudomonads would not contain unused genes. The advantages of a classification based on % (G+C) and DNA homology are obvious.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/13500872-42-1-43
1966-01-01
2021-07-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/42/1/mic-42-1-43.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/13500872-42-1-43&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baillie A., Hodgkiss W., Norms J. R. 1962; Flagellation of Azotobacter spp. as demonstrated by electron microscopy. J. appl. Bact 25:116
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology 1957 Breed R. S., Murray E. G. D., Smith N. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Co;
  3. Bolton E. T., McCarthy B. J. 1962 A general method for the isolation of RNA complementary to DNA. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci., U.S.A 48:1390
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Catalogue of Cultures Czechoslovak Collections of Micro-organisms; Brno: 1964
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Colwell R. R., Mandel M. 1964; Adansonian analysis and deoxyribonucleic acid base composition of some Gram-negative bacteria. J. Bact 87:1412
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Colwell R. R., Mandel M. 1965; Adansonian analysis and deoxyribonucleic acid base composition of Serratia marcescens. J. Bact 89:454
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De Ley J. 1964; Effect of mutation on DNA-composition of some bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 30:281
    [Google Scholar]
  8. De Ley J. 1965; DNA base composition of Klebsiella rubiacearum. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 31:203
    [Google Scholar]
  9. De Ley J., Friedman S. 1965; Similarity of Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas deoxyribonucleic acid. J. Bact 89:1306
    [Google Scholar]
  10. De Ley J., Rassel A. 1965; DNA base composition, flagellation and taxonomy of the genus Rhizobium. J. gen. Microbiol 41:85
    [Google Scholar]
  11. De Ley J., Schell J. 1963; Deoxyribonucleic acid base composition of acetic acid bacteria. J. gen. Microbiol 33:243
    [Google Scholar]
  12. De Ley J., Van Muylem J. 1963; Some applications of deoxyribonucleic acid base composition in bacterial taxonomy. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 29:344
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Doty P., Marmur J., Sueoka N. 1959; The heterogeneityin properties and functioning of deoxyribonucleic acids. Brookhaven Symp. Biol 12:1
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dowson W. J. 1939; On the systematic position and generic names of the Gram negative bacterial plant pathogens. Zentbl. Bakt. (2 Abt. Ong.) 100:177
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Friedman S., De Ley J. 1965; ‘Genetic species’ concept in Xanthomonas. J. Bact 89:95
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hoyer B. H., McCarthy B. J., Bolton E. T. 1964; A molecular approach in the systematics of higher organisms. Science 144:959
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lysenko O. 1961; Pseudomonas—an attempt at a general classification. J. gen. Microbiol 25:379
    [Google Scholar]
  18. McCarthy B. J., Bolton E. T. 1963; An approach to the measurement of genetic relatedness among organisms. Broc. nat. Acad. Sci., U.S.A 50:156
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Marmur J. 1961; A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from microorganisms. J. mol. Biol 3:208
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Marmur J., Doty P. 1962; Determination of the base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid from its thermal denaturation temperature. J. mol. Biol 5:109
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Marmur J., Falkow S., Mandel M. 1963; New approaches to bacterial taxonomy. Annu. Rev. Microbiol 17:329
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Starr M. P., Stephens W. L. 1964; Pigmentation and taxonomy of the genus Xanthomonas. J. Bact 87:293
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/13500872-42-1-43
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/13500872-42-1-43
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error