1887

Abstract

Genetic variation using probes derived from telomeric sequences was analysed among several strains in an attempt to identify discriminative fingerprint patterns. Three groups of wild isolates from different geographical areas and one group of standard laboratory strains were examined. Analysis of the endmost restriction fragments (EFs) and of the endmost-associated restriction fragments (EAFs) of the chromosomes revealed group differences. Most of the EFs in two groups of strains showed a similar length whereas in the other two groups they were distributed in classes of different lengths. Furthermore, analysis of the EAFs permitted possible fingerprint patterns to be predicted for each group of strains based on the occurrence of amplified bands as well as the presence or absence of distinct bands which were shown to be present in terminal as well as in interstitial sites of the chromosome. The approach evaluated in this work yielded highly polymorphic fingerprint patterns and could be used to distinguish groups of fungal isolates; this approach may also be effective for other fungal systems.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/13500872-142-10-2931
1996-10-01
2021-10-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/142/10/mic-142-10-2931.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/13500872-142-10-2931&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Banuett F. 1992; Ustilago maydis, the delightful blight. Trends Genet 8:174–180
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Banuett F., Herskowitz I. 1989; Different a alleles of Ustilago maydis are necessary for maintenance of filamentous growth but not for meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 865878–5882
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Blackburn E.H. 1994; Telomeres: no end in sight. Cell 77:621–623
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bölker M., Böhner H.U., Braun K.H., Görl J., Kahmann R. 1995; Tagging pathogenicity genes in Ustilago maydis by restriction enzvme-mediated integration (REMI). Mol Gen Genet 248:547–552
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown W.R.A., MacKinnon P.J., Villasante A., Spurr N., Buckle V.J., Dobson M.J. 1990; Structure and polymorphism of human telomere-associated DNA. Cell 63:119–132
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Church G.M., Gilbert W.G. 1984; Genomic sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 811991–1995
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Farman M.L., Leong S.A. 1995; Genetic and physical mapping of telomeres in the rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe grisea. . Genetics 140:479–492
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Foote S.J., Kemp D.J. 1989; Chromosomes of malaria parasites. Trends Genet 5:337–342
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fotheringham S., Holloman S. 1989; Cloning and disruption of Ustilago maydis genes. Mol Cell Biol 9:4052–4055
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gold S.E., Bakkeren G., Davies J.E., Kronstad J.W. 1994; Three selectable markers for transformation of Ustilago maydis. . Gene 142:225–230
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Guzmán P., Sánchez G. 1994; Characterization of telomeric regions from Ustilago maydis. . Microbiology 140:551–557
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Harley C.B., Futcher A.B., Greider C.W. 1990; Telomeres shorten during ageing of human fibroblasts. Nature 345:458–460
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kamper J., Reichmann M., Romeis T., Böiker M., Kahmann R. 1995; Multiallelic recognition: nonself-dependent dimerization of the bE and bW homeodomain proteins in Ustilago maydis. . Cell 81:73–83
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Levis R.W., Genesan R., Houtchers K., Tolar L.A., Sheen F.M-. 1993; Transposons in place of telomeric repeats at a Drosophila telomere. Cell 75:1083–1093
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Louis E.J., Naumova E.S., Lee A., Naumov G., Haber J.E. 1994; The chromosome end in yeast: its mosaic nature and influence on recombination dynamics. Genetics 136:789–802
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Pope D.D., McCarter S.M. 1992; Evaluation of inoculation methods for inducing common smut on corn ears. Phytopathology 82:950–955
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Richards E.J., Ausubel F.M. 1988; Isolation of a higher eukaryotic telomere from Arabidopsis thaliana. . Cell 53:127–136
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sambrook J., Fritsch E.F., Maniatis T. 1989 Molecular Cloning: a Uaboratory Manual, 2nd edn.. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory;
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Silhavy T.J., Berman M.L., Enquist L.W. 1984 Experiments with Gene Fusions Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory;
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Spellig T., Regenfelder E., Reichmann M., Schauwecker F., Bohlmann R., Urban M., Bölker M., Kamper J., Kahmann R. 1994; Control of mating and development in Ustilago maydis. . Antonie Feeuwenhoek 65:191–197
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Thakur R.P., Leonard K.J., Pataky J.K. 1989; Smut gall development in adult corn plants inoculated with Ustilago maydis. . Plant Dis 73:921–925
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Valverde M.E. 1992 Estudios sobre la infeccion de Ustilago maydis {huitlacoche) y sus caracterlsticas alimentarias Master thesis CINV- ESTAV-Irapuato; GTO, Mexico:
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Valverde M.E., Paredes-López O., Pataky J.K., Guevara-Lara F. 1995; Huitlacoche (Ustilago maydis) as a food source - biology, composition and production. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 35:191–229
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang J., Holden D.W., Leong S.A. 1988; Gene transfer system for the phytopathogenic fungus Ustilago maydis. . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85865–869
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Zakian V.A. 1989; Structure and function of telomeres. Annu Rev Genet 23:579–604
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/13500872-142-10-2931
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/13500872-142-10-2931
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error