1887

Abstract

SUMMARY:

The growth and survival of (NCIMB 10683) in a wheatfield and a sand-dune soil were investigated by introducing rod-shaped cells on the surface of microscope slides into the soil. Slides were recovered and stained with fluorescent antibodies. In the wheatfield soil, new microcolonies of considerable size were observed on or around both soil particles and fungal hyphae throughout the incubation period of 48 d. In both sterile and non-sterile wheatfield soil, the majority of the rods reverted to cocci after 2 weeks incubation. In the sand-dune soil, cells did not grow and only a few were found after 48 d. Growth of in the wheatfield soil was also investigated using a direct soil inoculation technique. Soil samples were recovered after different incubation periods and cells extracted using a centrifugation method. The number of cells in extracts was estimated using ELISA and direct count techniques. In the latter technique, extracted cells were double-stained with fluorescent antibodies and ethidium bromide. Growth took place in both sterile and non-sterile wheatfield soil. The introduced rods reverted to cocci after a few days, as on the slides. However, cells introduced directly into soil grew faster than those introduced on slides.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/13500872-141-2-505
1995-02-01
2021-10-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/141/2/mic-141-2-505.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/13500872-141-2-505&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bohlool B. B., Schmidt E. L. 1968; Non-specific staining; its control in immunofluorescence examination of soil. Science 162:1012–1014
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bohlool B. B., Schmidt E. L. 1973; A fluorescent antibody technique for determination of growth rates of bacteria in soil. Bull Ecol Res Comm 17:336–338
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Casida L. E. 1980; Death of Micrococcus luteus in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 39:1031–1034
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Deutch C. E., Perera G. S. 1992; Myceloid cell formation in Arthrobacter globiformis during osmotic stress. J Appl Bacteriol 72:493–499
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Engvall E., Perlmann P. 1971; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of immunoglobulin G. Immunochemistry 8:871–874
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Evans H. J., Koch B., Klucas R. 1972; Preparation of nitrogenase from nodules and Separation into components. Methods Enzymol 24:470–476
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fuhrmann J., Wollum A. G. 1985; Simplified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for routine identification of Rhizobium japonicum antigens. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:1010–1013
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Goodfellow M., Hill I. R., Gray T. R. G. 1968 Bacteria in a pine forest soil. In The Ecology of Soil Bacteria pp 500–515 R. G. Gray, D. Parkinson. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Habte M., Alexander M. 1977; Further evidence for the regulation of bacterial populations in soil by protozoa. Arch Microbiol 113:181–183
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Holben W. E., Jansson J. K., Chelm B. K., Tiedje J. M. 1988; DNA probe method for the detection of specific micro-organisms in the soil bacterial community. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:703–711
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kishinevsky B., Gurfel D. 1980; Evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for serological identification of different Rhizobium strains. J Appl Bacteriol 49:517–526
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lochner H. H., Strijdom B. W., Kishinevsky B., Steyn P. L. 1988; Limitation of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for routine determination of legume inoculant quality. J Appl Bacteriol 64:209–218
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lowe W. E., Gray T. R. 1972; Ecological studies on coccoid bacteria in a pine forest soil. I. Classification. Soil Biol Biochem 4:459–468
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lowe W. E., Gray T. R. G. (1973a). Ecological studies on coccoid bacteria in a pine forest soil. II. Growth of bacteria introduced into soil. Soil Biol Biochem 5:449–462
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lowe W. E., Gray T. R. G. (1973b). Ecological studies on coccoid bacteria in a pine forest soil. III. Competitive interactions between bacterial strains in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 5:463–472
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Luscombe B. M., Gray T. R. G. 1971; Effect of varying growth rate on the morphology of Arthrobacter . J Gen Microbiol 69:433–434
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Luscombe B. M., Gray T. R. G. 1974; Characteristics of Arthrobacter grown in continuous culture. J Gen Microbiol 82:213–222
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mansoor E. Y. 1993; Immunological approaches to the ecology of Arthrobacter in soil. PhD thesis, University of Essex
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Martensson A. M., Gustafsson J. G. 1985; . Competition between Rhizobium trifolii strains for nodulation, during growth in a fermenter, and in soil based inoculants, studied by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Gen Microbiol 131:3077–3082
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nambiar P. T.C., Anjaiah V. 1985; Enumeration of rhizobia by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). J Appl Bacteriol 58:187–193
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Olsen P. E., Rice W. A., Stemke G. W., Page W. J. 1983; Strain specific serological techniques for the identification of Rhizobium meliloti in commercial alfalfa inoculants. Can J Microbiol 29:225–230
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Robinson J. B., Salonius P. O., Chase F. E. 1965; A note on the differential response of Arthobacter spp. and Pseudomonasspp. to drying soil. Can J Microbiol 11:746–748
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Salonius P. O., Robinson J. B., Chase F. E. 1970; The mutual growth of Arthrobacter globiformis and Pseudomonas fluorescens in gamma sterilised soil. Plant Soil 32:316–326
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Schmidt E. L. 1974; Quantitative autecological studies of microorganisms in soil by immunofluorescence. Soil Sci 118:141–149
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Siala A., Gray T. R.G. 1974; Growth of Bacillus subtilis and spore germination in soil observed by a fluorescent antibody technique. J Gen Microbiol 81:191–198
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Thompson I. P., Cook K. A., Lethbridge G., Burns R. G. 1990; Survival of two ecologically distinct bacteria (Flavobacterium and Arthrobacter) in unplanted and rhizosphere soil. Soil Biol Biochem 22:1029–1037
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Thompson I. P., Young C., Cook K. A., Lethbridge G., Burns R. G. 1992; Survival of two ecologically distinct bacteria (Flavobacterium and Arthrobacter) in unplanted and rhizosphere soil : field studies. Soil Biol Biochem 24:1–14
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/13500872-141-2-505
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/13500872-141-2-505
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error