1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: Activity of diaminopimelate decarboxylase in strain w, growing in an aerated fermenter, was only slightly (14%) repressed by 2 m-lysine when approximately equimolar diaminopimelate was present in the medium. Lysine alone caused 78% repression. Diaminopimelate did not interfere with uptake of lysine by growing organisms. Organisms grown in medium containing diaminopimelate, without lysine, had a decarboxylase activity 24% higher than organisms from minimal medium. The extent of repression by pyridoxine (56% when added to minimal medium) was decreased (to 31%) when diaminopimelate was also present in the medium. A diaminopimelate-requiring mutant, with limited ability to take up diaminopimelate, formed almost three times less diaminopimelate decarboxylase than did a diaminopimelate-requiring second-stage mutant that had an increased rate of transport of this amino acid. The internal concentration of diaminopimelate thus probably regulates the activity of the decarboxylase by induction. Lysine might not directly repress the enzyme but might give an apparent repression by restricting the biosynthesis of diaminopimelate. This restriction is probably not caused only by inhibition or repression of aspartokinase. Lysine and threonine together, though not singly, almost completely inhibited aspartokinase but caused less apparent repression of diaminopimelate decarboxylase than did lysine alone. Lysine plus diaminopimelate strongly repressed the lysine-sensitive aspartokinase (85%) without much affecting diaminopimelate decarboxylase formation, and pyridoxine repressed the decarboxylase without affecting aspartokinase.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-96-1-51
1976-09-01
2021-10-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/96/1/mic-96-1-51.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-96-1-51&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Antia M., Hoare D. S., Work E. 1957; The stereoisomers of α,ε-diaminopimelic acid. 3. Properties and distribution of diaminopimelic acid racemase, an enzyme causing interconversion of the lland meso isomers. Biochemical Journal 65:448–459
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Black S., Wright N. G. 1955; β-Aspartokinase and β-aspartyl phosphate. Journal of Biological Chemistry 213:27–38
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bray G. A. 1960; A simple efficient liquid scintillator for counting aqueous solutions in a liquid scintillation counter. Analytical Biochemistry 1:279–285
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bukhari A. J., Taylor A. L. 1971; Mutants of Escherichia coli with a growth requirement for either lysine or pyridoxine. Journal of Bacteriology 105:988–998
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen G. N., Patte J.-C. 1963; Some aspects of the regulation of amino acid biosynthesis in a branched pathway. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 28:513–516
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis B. D. 1952; Diaminopimelic acid and lysine.Biosynthetic interrelations of lysine, diaminopimelic acid, and threonine in mutants of Escherichia coli. Nature, London 169:534–536
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Davis B. D., Mingioli E. S. 1950; Mutants of Escherichia coli requiring methionine or vitamin B12. Journal of Bacteriology 60:17–28
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Denman R. F., Hoare D. S., Work E. 1955; Diaminopimelic acid decarboxylase in pyridoxin-deficient Escherichia coli. Biochimica et biophysica acta 16:442–443
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gale E. F. 1946; The bacterial amino acid decarboxylases. Advances in Enzymology 6:1–32
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gilboe D. P., Friede J. D., Henderson L. M. 1968; Effect of hydroxylysine on the biosynthesis of lysine in Streptococcus faecalis. Journal of Bacteriology 95:856–863
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Grandgenett D. P., Stahly D. P. 1971; Repression of diaminopimelate decarboxylase by l-lysine in different Bacillus species. Journal of Bacteriology 105:1211–1212
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kelleher R. J.Jr Heggeness M. 1976; Repression of diaminopimelicacid decarboxylase in Escherichia coli: gene dosage effects and escape synthesis. Journal of Bacteriology 125:376–378
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Leive L., Davis B. D. 1965; The transport of diaminopimelate and cysteine in Escherichia coli. Journal of Biological Chemistry 240:4362–4369
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lowry O. H., Rosebrough N. J., Farr A. L., Randall R. J. 1951; Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193:265–275
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Meadow P., Hoare D. S., Work E. 1957; Interrelationships between lysine and α,ε-diaminopimelic acid and their derivatives and analogues in mutants of Escherichia coli. Biochemical Journal 66:270–282
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Milner H. W., Lawrence N. S., French C. S. 1950; Colloidal dispersion of chloroplast material. Science, New York 111:633–634
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Monod J., Pappenheimer A. M., Cohen-Bazire G. 1952; La cinétique de la biosynthese de la β-galactosidase chez Escherichia coli considereecommefonction de la croissance. Biochimica et biophysica acta 9:648–660
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Patte J.-C., Loviny T., Cohen G. N. 1962; Répression de la décarboxylase de l’acide méso-α,ε-diaminopimélique par la l-lysine, chez Escherichia coli. Biochimica et biophysica acta 58:359–360
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Patte J.-C., Loviny T., Cohen G. N. 1965; Effets inhibiteurscooperatifs de la l-lysine avec d’autres amino acids sur une aspartokinase de Escherichia coli. Biochimica et biophysica acta 99:523–530
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Patte J.-C., Boy E., Borne F. 1974; Role of the lysine-sensitive aspartokinase III in the regulation of Dap-decarboxylase synthesis in Escherichia coli KI2. FEBS Letters 43:67–70
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rosner A. 1975; Control of lysine biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis: inhibition of diaminopimelate decarboxylase by lysine. Journal of Bacteriology 121:20–28
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Saleh F., White P. J. 1975; Microbial methods for isolating the ll- or dd-isomer of 2,6-diaminopimelic acid. Proceedings of the Society for General Microbiology 3:44–45
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sanwall B. D. 1970; Allosteric controls of amphibolic pathways in bacteria. Bacteriological Reviews 34:20–39
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Shimura Y., Vogel H. J. 1966; Diaminopimelate decarboxylase of Lemnaperpusilla: partial purification and some properties. Biochimica et biophysica acta 118:396–404
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Stewart J. M. 1961; α,ε-Diamino-β-hydroxypimelic acid. II. Configuration of the isomers. Journal of the American Chemical Society 83:435–439
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Truffa-Bachi P., Cohen G. N. 1970; Aspartokinase 1 and homoserine dehydrogenase 1 (Escherichia coli K12). Methods in Enzymology 17a:694–699
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Umbarger H. E. 1969; Regulation of amino acid metabolism. Annual Review of Biochemistry 38:323–370
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Vogel H. J., Thompson J. S., Shockman G. D. 1970; Characteristic metabolic patterns of prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Symposia of the Society for General Microbiology 20:107–119
    [Google Scholar]
  29. White P. J. 1971; Diaminopimelate decarboxylase (Escherichia coli). Methods in Enzymology 17b:140–145
    [Google Scholar]
  30. White P. J. 1974; Prevention of lysine-repression of diaminopimelate decarboxylase by diaminopimelic acid. Proceedings of the Society for General Microbiology 1:72–73
    [Google Scholar]
  31. White P. J., Kelly B. 1965; Purification and properties of diaminopimelate decarboxylase from Escherichia coli. Biochemical Journal 96:75–84
    [Google Scholar]
  32. White P. J., Kelly B., Suffling A., Work E. 1964; Variation of activity of bacterial diaminopimelate decarboxylase under different conditions of growth. Biochemical Journal 91:600–610
    [Google Scholar]
  33. White P. J., Lejeune B., Work E. 1969; Assay and properties of diaminopimelateepimerase from Bacillus megaterium. Biochemical Journal 113:589–601
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Work E. 1957; Reaction of ninhydrin in acid solution with straight-chain amino acids containing two amino groups and its application to the estimation of α,ε-diaminopimelic acid. Biochemical Journal 67:416–423
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Work E. 1962; Diaminopimelate decarboxylase. Methods in Enzymology 5:864–870
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Yugari Y., Gilvarg C. 1962; Coordinated end-product inhibition in lysine synthesis in Escherichia coli. Biochimica et biophysica acta 62:612–614
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-96-1-51
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-96-1-51
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error