1887

Abstract

Summary: The function of Ca in a psychrophilic Achromobacter, previously found to bind large amounts of these ions to its envelope, has been studied. Bacteria suspended in media of low ionic content showed decreases in wet weight, dry weight and growth capacity, and increases in light scattering and in the release of u.v.-absorbing substances into the medium. The permeability barrier to Ca was also damaged, and there was a release of radioactivity from bacteria labelled with Ca. These events occurred at the optimum growth temperature, and took place at increased rates at higher temperatures. Damage was prevented to about the same extent by 0·1 m-CaCl, BaCl or MgCl and by 10 m-NaCl, KCl or LiCl. Ion competition experiments showed that Ca was preferentially taken up and retained in comparison with Ba, Mg and Na, in that order. Isolated envelopes gave similar results. The dry weight of envelopes was reduced by 35% when they were suspended in water at 40 °C.

It is clear that the function of certain envelope components in Achromobacter is highly dependent on divalent cations; and that both the integrity of the permeability barrier and the stability of the envelope are affected at low ion concentrations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-94-2-351
1976-06-01
2022-01-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/94/2/mic-94-2-351.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-94-2-351&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bayer M. E. 1968; Areas of adhesion between wall and membrane of Escherichia coli. Journal of General Microbiology 53:395–404
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Braun V., Sieglin U. 1970; The covalent murein-lipoprotein structure of the Escherichia coli cell wall. The attachment site of the lipoprotein on the murein. European Journal of Biochemistry 13:336–346
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown A. D. 1964; Aspects of bacterial response to the ionic environment. Bacteriological Reviews 28:296–329
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Burman L. G., Nordström K., Bloom G. D. 1972; Murein and the outer penetration barrier of Escherichia coli KI2, Proteus mirabi/is, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Bacteriology 112:1364–1374
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chipley J. R., Edwards H. M.Jr 1972; Permeability increases in cells of Salmonella enteritidis induced by ethylenediaminetetraacetate and temperature treatments. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 18:1803–1807
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Costerton J. W., Ingram J. M., Cheng K. J. 1974; Structure and function of the cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria. Bacteriological Reviews 38:87–110
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cox S. T.Jr Eagon R. G. 1968; Action of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, tris(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane, and lysozyme on cell walls of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 14:913–922
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Eagon R. G., Simmons G. P., Carson J. K. 1965; Evidence for the presence of ash and divalent metals in the cell wall of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 11:1041–1042
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hendricks S. B. 1964; Salt transport across cell membranes. American Scientist 52:306–334
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Humphrey B., Vincent J. M. 1962; Calcium in cell walls of Rhizobium trifolii. Journal of General Microbiology 29:557–561
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Koch A. L. 1961; Some calculations on the turbidity of mitochondria and bacteria. Biochimica et biophysica acta 51:429–441
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ledebo I. 1974; Calcium uptake by a psychrophilic Achromobacter strain. Physiologia plantarum 30:317–322
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ledebo I., Ljunger C. 1973; Permeability of bacteria to inorganic cations. A comparison between a psychrophilic Achromobacter strain and Escherichia coli. Physiologia plantarum 28:535–540
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Leive L. 1968; Studies on the permeability change produced in coliform bacteria by ethylenediaminetetraacetate. Journal of Biological Chemistry 243:2373–2380
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Leive L. 1974; The barrier function of the Gram-negative envelope. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 235:109–127
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Marquis R. E. 1968; Salt-induced conti action of bacterial cell walls. Journal of Bacteriology 95:775–781
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Nikaido H. 1973; Biosynthesis and assembly of lipopolysaccharide and the outer membrane layer of Gram-negative cell wall. In Membranes and Walls of Bacteria pp. 131–208 Leive L. Edited by New York: Marcel Dekker;
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Rayman M. K., Macleod R. A. 1975; Interaction of Mg2+ with peptidoglycan and its relation to the prevention of lysis of a marine pseudomonad. Journal of Bacteriology 122:650–659
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Reynolds J. A. 1972; Are inorganic cations essential for the stability of biological membranes?. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 195:75–85
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Salton M. R. J. 1964 The Bacterial Cell Wall p. 246 Amsterdam: Elsevier;
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-94-2-351
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-94-2-351
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error