1887

Abstract

Summary: Micronuclei of at the prophase (crescent stage) of the first meiotic division during conjugation or autogamy were characterized by an elongated, somewhat curved shape. They contained small aggregates of a fibrillar material scattered uniformly throughout the nucleoplasm and a single layer of intranuclear microtubules located close under, and adhering to, the inner nuclear membrane. These microtubules ran parallel to each other and parallel to the long axis of the micronucleus. At one end of the crescent stage micronuclei, there were two electron-dense bodies, which may function as organizing centres for micro-tubular assembly. During subsequent meiotic divisions the single layer of intranuclear microtubules was absent but a microtubular meiotic spindle was present.

Both gamete pronuclei in each conjugant contained microtubules distributed evenly throughout the nucleoplasm and aligned in one direction. The migratory (male) pronucleus formed pseudopodia during its passage through the cytoplasmic bridge and was surrounded by extranuclear bundles of microtubules located in the cytoplasm close to the nuclear envelope. Stationary (female) pronuclei had no extranuclear microtubules.

During all stages of conjugation or autogamy the nuclear envelope remained intact.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-94-1-193
1976-05-01
2021-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/94/1/mic-94-1-193.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-94-1-193&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. André J., Vivier E. 1962; Quelques aspects ultrastructurales de l’échange micronucléaire lors de la conjugaison chez Paramecium caudatum. Journal of Ultrastructure Research 6:390–406
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bikle D., Tilney L. G., Porter K. R. 1966; Microtubules and pigment migration in the melanophores of Fundulusheteroclitus L. Protoplasma 61:322–345
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brinkley B. R., Nicklas R. B. 1968; Ultrastructure of meiotic spindle of grasshopper spermatocytes after chromosome micromanipulation. Journal of Cell Biology 39:16a–17a
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dirksen E. R., Crocker T. T. 1966; Centriole replication in differentiating ciliated cells of mammalian respiratory epithelium. Journal de Microscopie 5:629–644
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dryl S. 1959; Antigenic transformation in Paramecium aurelia after homologous antiserum treatment during autogamy and conjugation. Journal of Protozoology 6:S25
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Holmes K. V., Choppin P. W. 1968; On the role of microtubules in movement and alignment of nuclei in virus-induced syncytia. Journal of Cell Biology 39:526–543
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Inaba F., Kudo N. 1972; Electron microscopy of the nuclear events during binary fission in Paramecium multimicronucleatum. Journal of Protozoology 19:57–63
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Inaba F., Imamoto K., Suganuma Y. 1966; Electron microscope observations on nuclear exchange during conjugation in Paramecium multimicronucleatum. Proceedings of the Japan Academy 42394–398
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Jones K. W. 1956 Nuclear differentiation in Paramecium. Ph.D. thesis, University College Wales, Aberystwyth
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jurand A., Bomford R. 1965; The fine structure of the parasitic suctorian Podophrya parameciorum. Journal de Microscopie 5:509–522
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jurand A., Ireland M. J. 1965; A slow rotary shaker for embedding in viscous media. Stain Technology 40:233–234
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jurand A., Selman G. G. 1969 The Anatomy of Paramecium aurelia. London: Macmillan;
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jurand A., Selman G. G. 1970; Ultrastructure of the nuclei and intranuclear microtubules of Paramecium aurelia. Journal of General Microbiology 60:357–364
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Olmsted J. B., Borisy G. G. 1973; Microtubules. Annual Review of Biochemistry 42:507–540
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Reynolds E. S. 1963; The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology 17:208–213
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Roberts K. 1974; Cytoplasmic microtubules and their functions. In Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 28 pp. 371–402 Butler J. A. V., Nobel D. Edited by Oxford: Pergamon;
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Sabnis D. D., Jacobs W. P. 1967; Cytoplasmic streaming and microtubules in coenocytic marine alga Caulerpaprolifera. Journal of Cell Science 2:465–472
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Schneider L. 1963; Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen der Konjugation von Paramecium.I. Die Auflösung und Neubildung der Zellmembranbei den Konjuganten. Protoplasma 56:109–140
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Stevenson I. 1972; Ultrastructure of nuclear division in Paramecium aurelia. III. Meiosis in the micronucleus during conjugation. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 25:775–799
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Stevenson I., Lloyd F. P. 1971; Ultrastructure of nuclear division in Paramecium aurelia. I. Mitosis in micronucleus. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 24:963–975
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Tilney L. G. 1971; Origin and continuity of microtubules. In Origin and Continuity of Cell Organelles pp. 222–260 Reinert J., Ursprung H. Edited by Berlin: Springer Verlag;
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Vivier E. 1974; Morphology, taxonomy and general biology of the genus Paramecium. In Paramecium - A Current Survey pp. 1–89 van Wagtendonk W. J. Edited by Amsterdam: Elsevier;
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Vivier E., André J. 1961; Données structurales et ultrastructurales nouvelles sur la conjugaison de Paramecium caudatum. Journal of Protozoology 8:416–426
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-94-1-193
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-94-1-193
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error