1887

Abstract

Estimates were made of the numbers of viable bacteria in the rumens of sheep receiving different rations. Representative colonies were isolated and tested for urease production. Some urease-positive isolates were characterized and identified. The ureolytic activities of the urease-producing isolates were determined and compared with the activity of rumen fluid. The rations fed to the sheep did not exert a significant influence on the relative numbers of the urease-producing organisms in the rumen. No obligately anaerobic ureolytic bacteria were found. All urease-positive isolates were facultatively anaerobic, Gram-positive, catalase-positive cocci. Out of ten isolates, nine were identified as and one as . The total urease activity of the different isolates based on the lowest numbers in which they were present in the rumen, compared favourably with the urease activity of rumen fluid. The facultatively anaerobic Grampositive cocci were probably responsible for a large proportion of the urease activity of the rumen fluid. Conditions prevailing in the rumen were found to be conducive to urease production by the isolates tested.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-91-2-225
1975-12-01
2021-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/91/2/mic-91-2-225.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-91-2-225&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abou Akkada A. R., Blackburn T. H. 1963; Some observations on the nitrogen metabolism of rumen proteolytic bacteria. Journal of General Microbiology 31:461–469
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergey’s Manual Of Determinative Bacteriology 1974, 8th edn.. Buchanan R. E., Gibbons N. E. Edited by Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co.;
  3. Blackburn T. H., Hobson P. N. 1960; Proteolysis in the sheep rumen by whole and fractioned rumen contents. Journal of General Microbiology 22:272–281
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bryant M. P. 1959; Bacterial species of the rumen. Bacteriological Reviews 23:125–153
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bryant M. P. 1965; Rumen methanogenic bacteria. In Physiology of Digestion in the Ruminant. Dougherty R. W. others London: Butterworths.;
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bryant M. P., Burkey L. A. 1953; Cultural methods and some characteristics of some of the more numerous groups of bacteria in the bovine rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 36:205–217
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cook A. R. 1972; Ureolysis in the ovine rumen. Biochemical Journal 127:66
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cook A. M., Steel R. G. 1959; A method for the preparation of bacterial dilutions. Laboratory Practice 8:359
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cruickshank R. 1965 Medical Microbiology, 11th edn.. London: E. & S. Livingstone.;
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gibbons R. J., Doetsch R. N. 1959; Physiological study of an obligately anaerobic ureolytic bacterium. Journal of Bacteriology 77:417–428
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gibbons R. J., McCarthy R. D. 1957; Obligately anaerobic urea hydrolysing bacteria in the bovine rumen. In Maryland Agricultural Experimental Station Miscellaneous Publication 29112–16
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Heald P. J., Krogh N., Mann S. O., Appleby J. C., Masson F. M., Oxford A. E. 1953; A method for direct viable counts of the facultatively anaerobic microflora in the rumen of a sheep on hay diet. Journal of General Microbiology 9:207–215
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Huhtanen C. N., Gall L. S. 1955; Manometric estimation of rumen urease. Journal of Bacteriology 69:102–103
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hungate R. E. 1960; Microbial ecology of the rumen. Bacteriological Reviews 24:353–364
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hungate R. E. 1966 The Rumen and Its Microbes. New York: Academic Press.;
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hungate R. E., Bryant M. P., Mah R. A. 1964; The rumen bacteria and protozoa. Annual Review of Microbiology 18:131–166
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones G. A., MacLeod R. A., Blackwood A. C. 1964; Ureolytic rumen bacteria. I. Characteristics of the microflora from a urea-fed sheep. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 10:371–378
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kistner A. 1960; An improved method for viable counts of bacteria of the ovine rumen which ferment carbohydrates. Journal of General Microbiology 23:565–567
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Mann S. O. 1968; An improved method for determining cellulolytic activity in anaerobic bacteria. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 31:241–244
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mann S. O., Masson F. M., Oxford A. E. 1954; Facultative anaerobic bacteria from the sheep rumen. Journal of General Microbiology 10:142–149
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Pearson R. M., Smith J. A. B. 1943; The utilization of urea in the bovine rumen. II. The conversion of urea to ammonia. Biochemical Journal 37:148–153
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Shaw C., Stitt J. M., Cowan S. T. 1951; Staphylococci and their classification. Journal of General Microbiology 5:1010–1023
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Toerien D. F. 1969 Population description of the non-methanogenic phase of anaerobic digestion. D.Sc. thesis University of Pretoria.:
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Williams V. J., Moir R. J. 1951; Ruminal flora studies in the sheep. II. The effect of the level of nitrogen intake upon the total number of free micro-organisms in the rumen. Australian Journal of Scientific Research 3:381–392
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-91-2-225
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-91-2-225
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error