A Cellulolytic Rumen Bacterium, Micromonospora ruminantium sp.nov

References

1. Blackburn T. H., Hobson P. N. 1962; Further studies on the isolation of proteolytic bacteria from the sheep rumen. Journal of General Microbiology 29:69–81
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bryant M. P., Burkey A. L. 1953; Cultural methods and some characteristics of some of the more numerous groups of bacteria in the bovine rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 36:205–217
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bryant M. P., Doetch R. N. 1954; A study of actively cellulolytic rod shaped bacteria of the bovine rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 37:1176–1183
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bryant M. P., Robinson I. M. 1961; An improved nonselective culture medium for ruminal bacteria and its use in determining diurnal variation in number of bacteria in the rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 44:1446–1456
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bryant M. P., Small N. 1956; The anaerobic monotrichous butyric acid producing curved rod-shaped bacteria of the rumen. Journal of Bacteriology 72:16–21
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clark W. M. 1960 Oxydation-reduction Potentials of Organic Systems Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins;
   [Google Scholar]
7. Fulghum R. S., Moore W. E. C. 1963; Isolation, enumeration and characteristics of proteolytic rumen bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology 85:806–815
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gall L. S., Huhtanen C. N. 1951; Criteria forjudging a true rumen organism and a description of five rumen bacteria. Journal of Dairy Science 34:353–362
   [Google Scholar]
9. Van Gylswyk N. O. 1970; The effect of supplementing a low protein hay on the cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen of sheep and on the digestibility of cellulose and hemicellulose. Journal of Agricultural Science 74:169–180
   [Google Scholar]
10. Van Gylswyk N. O., Hoffman J. P. L. 1970; Characteristics of cellulolytic Cillobacteria from the rumens of sheep fed teff (Eragrostics tef) hay diets. Journal of General Microbiology 60:381–386
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hankus A. 1963; Pomiary i interpretacja potencjalow utleniajaco redukujacych w zlozonych ukladach biologicznych. Zeszyty Naukowe (Wyd.) Politechnika Krakowska8 a
    [Google Scholar]
12. Harrigan W. F., Mccance M. E. 1966 Laboratory Methods in Microbiology London & New York: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
13. Huang P. C., Rosenberg E. 1966; Determination of DNA base composition via depurination. Analytical Biochemistry 16:107–113
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hungate R. E. 1946; Studies on cellulose fermentation. II. An anaerobic cellulose-decomposing Actino- mycete, Micromonospora propionici N.sp. Journal of Bacteriology 51:51–56
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hungate R. E. 1966 The Rumen and its Microbes London & New York: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
16. Jacobs B. J., Gerstein M.J.W.G. 1965 Dictionary of Microbiology. London: D. van Nostrand Company I.N.C;
    [Google Scholar]
17. Leatherwood J. M., Sharma M. P. 1972; Novel anaerobic cellulolytic bacterium. Journal of Bacteriology no:751–753
    [Google Scholar]
18. Mann S. O. 1968; An improved method for determining cellulolytic activity in anaerobic bacteria. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 31:221–224
    [Google Scholar]
19. Prévot A. 1966 Manual for the Classification and Determination of the Anaerobic Bacteria Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger;
    [Google Scholar]
20. Skerman V. B. 1967 A Guide to the Identification of the Genera of Bacteria Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins;
    [Google Scholar]
21. Skulmowski J., Honory K., Honory D., Szewczyk M. 1969; Metoda oznaczania lotnych kwasów tluszczowych (LKT) w kiszonce oraz treści żwacza przy użyciu chromatografii kolumnowej. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych 92-B-1:163–174
    [Google Scholar]
22. Tanner F. W. 1944 icrobiology of Foods Press Champaoign; Illinois: Garrard:
    [Google Scholar]