1887

Abstract

Summary: Ninety-six Campylobacters were isolated from cattle, sheep, pigs and fowls, of which 40 were studied in detail. Characterization by routine biochemical tests indicated that all isolates were similar and that differences did not correspond with habitat or pathogenicity. The electrophoresis patterns of acid plus phenol-soluble proteins from the 40 Campylobacters allowed the isolates to be placed in three groups which correlated with habitat. Group I comprised all the Campylobacters from the bovine genital tract (these isolates were associated with infertility). Group II comprised all the strains isolated from cattle faeces and all the strains associated with sporadic abortions in cattle and sheep. Group III comprised all the Campylobacters from healthy pigs and from pigs with swine dysentery. Isolates could not be differentiated by electrophoresis of total soluble proteins. Isocitrate dehydrogenase and peroxidase electrophoresis patterns each allowed the pig Campylobacters to be differentiated from cattle and sheep Campylobacters, but did not allow finer differentiation. Malate dehydrogenase patterns, which were produced only by the pig Campylobacters, provided three groups but these did not correlate with isolation source. It is concluded that there is no qualitative difference in the Campylobacter population of the gut of healthy and dysenteric pigs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-78-1-165
1973-09-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/78/1/mic-78-1-165.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-78-1-165&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Andress C. E., Barnum D. A. 1968; Pathogenicity of Vibrio coli for swine. II. Experimental infection of conventional pigs wit.. V. coli. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine and Veterinary Science 32:529–532
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bond J. M. 1957; Characteristics of colonial forms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.. American Journal of Veterinary Research 18:449–455
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Broome J. 1963; A rapid method of disk electrophoresis.. Nature, London 199:179–180
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Clarke J. T. 1964; Simplified ‘disc’ (polyacrylamide gel) electrophoresis.. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 121:428–436
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cruickshank R. 1965 Medical Microbiology, 11th edn.. London: Livingstone;
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis B. J. 1964; Disc electrophoresis. II. Method and application to human serum proteins.. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 121:404–427
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Davis J. W. 1961; Studies on swine dysentery.. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 138:471–473
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Deas D. W. 1960; Observations on swine dysentery and associated vibrios.. Veterinary Record 72:65–68
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Doyle L. P. 1948; The etiology of swine dysentery.. American Journal of Veterinary Research 9:50–51
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Firehammer B. D., Border M. 1968; Isolation of temperate bacteriophages from Pseudomonas aeruginosa.. American Journal of Veterinary Research 29:2229–2235
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Florent A. 1953; Isolement d’un vibrion saprophyte du sperme du taureau et du vagin de la vache (Vibrio bubulus). Comptes rendus des séances de la Société de biologie 147:2066–2069
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Florent A. 1957; Analogies entre certaines souches de Vibrio coli et certaines souches de Vibrio foetus. Adaption des premieres a l’intestin de la bête bovine.. Comptes rendus des séances de la Société de biologie 151:1055–1057
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Florent A. 1959; Les deux vibrioses genitales de la bête bovine: la vibriose venerienne, due a Pseudomonas aeruginosa. foetus venerealis, et la vibriose d’origine intestinale due a V. foetus intestinalis.. Proceedings of the XVI th International Veterinary Congress, Madrid 2:489–493
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Florent A. 1963; Apropos des vibrions responsables de la vibriose genitale des bovins et des ovin.. Bulletin, Office International des Epizooties 60:1063–1074
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Haas H., Davidson Y., Sacks T. 1972; Taxonomy of Mycobacteria studied by polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis of cell proteins.. Journal of Medical Microbiology 5:31–37
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Harris D. L., Glock R. D. 1971; Swine dysentery: a review.. Iowa State University Veterinarian 33:4–11
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hurvell B., Reiland S. 1970; Vibrio coli hos grisar.. Nordisk veterinärmedicin 22:456–462
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kennedy S. I. T., Fewson C. A. 1968; Enzymes of the mandelate pathway in bacterium N.C.I.B. 8250. Biochemical Journal 107:497–506
    [Google Scholar]
  19. King E. O. 1962; The laboratory recognition of Vibrio fetus and a closely related Vibrio isolated from cases of human vibrosis.. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 98:700–711
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lawson J. R. 1959; Vibriosis. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa.. Diseases due to Bacteria Edited by Stableforth A. W., Galloway A. London: Butterworths.;
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lund B. M. 1965; A comparison by the use of gel electrophoresis of soluble protein components and esterase enzymes of some group D streptococci.. Journal of General Microbiology 40:413–419
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mohanty S. B., Plumer G. J., Faber J. E. 1962; Biochemical and colonial characteristics of some bovine vibrios.. American Journal of Veterinary Research 23:554–557
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Moore B. 1954; Observations on a group of anaerobic vaginal vibrios.. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 67:416–423
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Morris J. A. 1971 Studies on Campylobacter spp. (microaerophilic vibrios) Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading;
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Morris J. A., Park R. W. A. 1970; The use of polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of cell proteins to differentiate between microaerophilic vibrios.. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 33:iv
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Morris J. A., Park R. W. A. 1971; The isolation of microaerophilic vibrios. In Isolation of Anaerobes pp 207–217 Edited by Shapton D. A., Board R. G. London: Academic Press.;
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Norris J. R. 1964; The classification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 27:439–447
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Park R. W. A., Munro I. B., Melrose D. R., Stewart D. L. 1962; Observations on the ability of two biochemical types of Vibrio fetus to proliferate in the genital tract of cattle and their importance with respect to infertility.. British Veterinary Journal 118:411–420
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Pejtschev P. 1969; Ein Fall von Vibrio fetus be.. Rattus norvegicus. Zentralblatt für Veterindrmedizin, Reihe B 16:480–482
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Plastridge W. N., Williams L. F., Trowbridge D. G. 1964; Antibiotic sensitivity of physiologic groups of microaerophilic vibrios.. American Journal of Veterinary Research 25:1295–1299
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Razin S., Rottem S. 1967; Identification of Mycoplasma and other microorganisms by polyacrylamide- gel electrophoresis of cell proteins.. Journal of Bacteriology 94:1807–1810
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Rosett T. 1965; Cooling device for use with a sonic oscillator.. Applied Microbiology 13:254–256
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sacks T. G., Haas H., Razin S. 1969; Polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis of cell proteins of Entero- bacteriaceae. A possible taxonomic aid. Israe.. Journal of Medical Sciences 5:49–55
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sebald M., Véron M. 1963; Teneur en bases de l’ADN et classification des vibrions.. Annales de l’Institut Pasteur 105:897–910
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Söderlind O. 1965; The isolation of Vibrio coli from pigs.. Veterinary Record 77:193–196
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Thouvenot H., Florent A. 1954; Étude d’un anaérobie du sperme du taureau et du vagin de la vache.. Vibrio bubulus Florent 1953 Annales de l’ Institut Pasteur 86:237–241
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Watson W. A., Hunter D., Bellhouse R. 1967; Studies on vibrionic infection of sheep and carrion crows.. Veterinary Record 81:220–226
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Whenham G. R., Carlson H. C., Askel A. 1961; Avian vibrionic hepatitis in Alberta.. Canadian Veterinary Journal 2:3–7
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-78-1-165
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-78-1-165
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error