1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: Populations of over 400 /ml were maintained for over 18 months in the presence of bacteria, in a potassium phosphate-rich medium under 95% N + 5% CO with the daily addition of wholemeal flour and dried grass. was also maintained at a population density of 45 to 70/ml under the same conditions, except that it was necessary to add each day a culture of another protozoon such as or to give a population density of approximately 100/ml. The epidinia at least were engulfed by the polyplastron up to 10 being taken up each day; the minimum daily requirement for growth was one epidinium/polyplastron. also grew in the absence of other protozoa on a sodium chloride-rich medium, and if these protozoa were inoculated into the potassium phosphate-rich medium in the presence of epidinia, there was a lag of 3 to 5 days before they began to engulf the epidinia. The effect of other variations in the culture conditions is also described.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-73-3-509
1972-12-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/73/3/mic-73-3-509.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-73-3-509&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Burbank W. D. 1942; Physiology of the ciliate Colpidium colpoda 1. The effect of various bacteria as food on the division rate of Colpidium colpoda . Physiological Zoology 15:342–362
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Claff C. L., Dewey V. C., Kidder G. W. 1941; Feeding mechanisms and nutrition in three species of Bresslaua. Biological Bulletin, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 81:221–234
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Clarke R. T. J. 1963; The cultivation of some rumen oligotrich prototozoa. Journal of General Microbiology 33:401–408
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Coleman G. S. 1958; Maintenance of oligotrich protozoa from the sheep rumen in vitro . Nature, London 182:1104–1105
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Coleman G. S. 1960; The cultivation of sheep rumen oligotrich protozoa in vitro . Journal of General Microbiology 22:555–563
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Coleman G. S. 1964; The metabolism of Escherichia coli and other bacteria by Entodinium caudatum . Journal of General Microbiology 37:209–223
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Coleman G. S. 1969; The cultivation of the rumen ciliate Entodinium simplex . Journal of General Microbiology 57:81–90
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Coleman G. S. 1970; The cultivation of the rumen ciliate Polyplastron multivesiculatum . Journal of General Microbiology 61:iv
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Coleman G. S. 1971; The cultivation of rumen entodiniomorphid protozoa. In Isolation of Anaerobes, pp. 159–176 Edited by Shapton D. A., Board R. B. London and New York: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Coleman G. S. 1972; The metabolism of starch, glucose, amino acids, purines, pyrimidines and bacteria by the rumen ciliate Entodinium simplex . Journal of General Microbiology, 71:117–131
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Crawley H. 1923; Evolution in the ciliate family Ophryoscolecidae. Proceedings of Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 75:393–412
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dewey V. C., Kidder G. W. 1940; Growth studies on ciliates. 6. Diagnosis, sterilization and growth characteristics of Perispira ovum . Biological Bulletin, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 79:255–271
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dogiel V. A. 1927; Monographic der Familie Ophryoscolecidae. Archiv fur Protistenkunde 59:1–227
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Eadie J. M. 1962; Inter-relationships between certain rumen ciliate protozoa. Journal of General Microbiology 29:579–588
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Eadie J. M. 1967; Studies on the ecology of certain rumen ciliate protozoa. Journal of General Microbiology 49:175–194
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gutierrez J., Davis R. E. 1962; Culture and metabolism of the rumen ciliate Epidinium ecaudatum Crawley. Applied Microbiology 10:305–308
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hungate R. E. 1942; The culture of Eudiplodinium neglectum, with experiments on the digestion of cellulose. Biological Bulletin, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, 83:303–319
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hungate R. E. 1943; Further experiments on the cellulose digestion by the protozoa in the rumen of cattle. Biological Bulletin, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, 84:157–163
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hungate R. E. 1955; Mutualistic intestinal protozoa. In Biochemistry and Physiology of Protozoa, vol. 2 pp. 159–199 Edited by Hutner S. H., Lwoff A. New York and London: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jarvis B. D. W., Hungate R. E. 1968; Factors influencing agnotiobiotic cultures of the rumen ciliate Entodinium simplex . Applied Microbiology 16:1044–1052
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kofoid C. A., MacLennan R. F. 1933; Ciliates from Bos indicus Linn. 3 Epidinium Crawley, Epiplastron Gen. Nov., and Ophryoscolex Stein. University of California Publications in Zoology 39:1–33
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kudo R. R. 1946 Protozoology. Illinois, U.S.A.: C. C. Thomas;
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mah R. A. 1964; Factors influencing the in vitro culture of the rumen ciliate Ophryoscolex purkynei Stein. Journal of Protozoology 11:546–552
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sharp R. G. 1914; Diplodinium ecaudatum with an account of its neuromotor apparatus. University of California Publications in Zoology 13:43–122
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Tompkin R. B., Purser D. B., Weiser H. H. 1966; Influence of rumen fluid source upon establishment and cultivation in vitro of the rumen protozoon Entodinium . Journal of Protozoology 13:55–58
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-73-3-509
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-73-3-509
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error